Hon. Fatou Kinteh Receives Prestigious African Union Women’s Impact Award

The Honorable Fatou Kinteh, Minister of Gender, Children and Social Welfare, has been recognized with the esteemed African Union Women’s Impact Award at the Global Excellence Summit & AU Agenda 2063 Women’s Impact Awards 2025, held on May 23rd and 24th in Lagos, Nigeria. In an official statement, the organizers expressed their admiration for Minister Kinteh’s exemplary leadership and unwavering commitment to the rights and advancement of women in The Gambia and throughout the African continent. The high-profile summit was jointly organized by the Global Excellence Summit & Awards (GESA) and the African Union Agenda 2063 Ambassadorial Assembly – Women and Gender Committee. Hon. Kinteh was lauded as a visionary leader in governance and women’s empowerment. Her award acknowledges her significant contributions to gender inclusion, leadership, and human development, both nationally and internationally. Her efforts continue to inspire a new generation of leaders, championing cross-border solidarity and propelling sustainable development and inclusive growth.

The summit brought together a distinguished assembly of African and global leaders, diplomats, policymakers, entrepreneurs, and changemakers. Due to scheduling conflicts, the award was presented on Hon. Kinteh’s behalf by His Excellency Mohamadou Musa (Papa) Njie, The Gambia’s High Commissioner to Nigeria.

Amie Bojang-Sissoho On The Role of Ministers In Governance

Dear Mantawrawally Blog, I would like to take a moment to share my thoughts on the captivating analysis regarding the role of Ministers in governance. It is my belief that political parties craft manifestos to outline their governance plans, providing voters with a clear picture of what they can expect once in office. Consequently, every government seeks to identify individuals who will champion and advance this developmental agenda. Ministers are entrusted as leaders of policy advocacy, illustrating how the governing party is translating its campaign promises into reality through a comprehensive development agenda.

Though Ministers are political appointees, their technical expertise is crucial in working alongside Permanent Secretaries, who must remain non-partisan to uphold the national interest. Permanent Secretaries, as civil servants with permanent appointments, play a vital role in safeguarding governance systems, procedures, and processes from potential misuse. They are the skilled professionals who guide politicians, ensuring that efforts to achieve development goals are conducted in accordance with good governance practices and the rule of law. Even when they may not align with the party in power, Permanent Secretaries, as technical heads of their Ministries, are expected to uphold professionalism and not undermine the government of the day. Their unique position allows them to serve any ruling party, while political appointees are loyal only to the government that appointed them. Once leadership changes, political appointees often depart as well. However, this does not imply that political appointees cannot excel in their areas of expertise; indeed, many Ministers may claim to be "technocrats," thus preserving their chances for reappointment by future administrations. Permanent Secretaries should serve as mentors to Ministers, facilitating the successful implementation of government policies while aligning party interests with national priorities for sustainable development. Nation building is an ongoing journey, yet different governments adopt varying approaches and emphasize diverse priorities. The actions and strategies employed in nation building are shaped by the ideologies and perspectives of those in power. Regardless of the ideology they espouse, leaders share a common aspiration to provide citizens with: 1. Quality healthcare services 2. Accessible education for all 3. A boost in mechanized agriculture, manufacturing, and marketing 4. Robust road infrastructure 5. Affordable and accessible electricity By fostering an enabling environment, governments can stimulate job creation and economic growth, ultimately enhancing the livelihoods and well-being of their citizens within a framework of good governance and democracy. This divergence in governance significantly influences how the ruling party approaches its developmental goals. I extend my heartfelt gratitude to Alagi Yorro and Yaya Dampha for igniting such an engaging debate. There remain numerous unanswered questions regarding this discourse, which I believe should be brought to the annual National Dialogue level, allowing Gambians to contribute further insights on “party politics, political appointments, and governance in The Gambia.” Such candid discussions are essential for guiding citizens toward promoting good governance and fostering a sense of responsible public service. Wishing everyone a blessed Eid Mubarak. Warm regards, Amie Bojang-Sissoho DPPR 6th June 2025.

Alagi Yorro Jallow Writes Yaya Dampha Clarifies

Rebuttal to Alagi Yorro Jallow: Understanding the Role of Ministers as Political Appointees Dear Alagi Yorro Jallow, Thank you for sharing your insights on the role of cabinet ministers in governance, particularly in the context of The Gambia. While I appreciate the importance of neutrality and professionalism in public service, it is vital to understand the unique nature of political appointments and the realities of governance in a democratic framework. Your critique of the expectation that ministers act as representatives of the ruling party overlooks a fundamental truth of our political system: ministers are political appointees chosen by the president who often share a political vision and mandate. This alignment is not only logical but necessary for coherent governance. Ministers who support the president's agenda ensure that the policy direction is consistent, unified, and conducive to achieving the administration's goals. It is essential to recognize that the essence of democracy involves a political majority that has earned the right to govern—often through a clear electoral mandate. In this context, cabinet ministers cannot merely be viewed as neutral public servants devoid of party affiliation, but rather as integral components of the political framework that advances the electorate's will. It is perfectly normal for these officials to engage in political activities that promote the policies they are responsible for implementing—this is not a betrayal of public trust, but a reflection of their chosen role within a political system. You invoke the Swedish model of governance to highlight a standard of ministerial neutrality. However, it is crucial to remember that different political cultures yield different norms. Sweden’s consensus-driven, multi-party system functions distinctly from The Gambia’s political landscape, where the ruling party needs its ministers to actively participate in promoting its agenda to ensure stability and social cohesion. The challenges facing our country—economic development, social justice, and institutional integrity—require an engaged cabinet that rallies behind the president's vision, mobilizing support and resources to tackle pressing issues. Furthermore, your argument about the integrity of public institutions is valid, but it is essential not to conflate party activities with a loss of that integrity. Political engagement by ministers does not inherently diminish their ability to serve the public effectively. Instead, when ministers are energized and committed to promoting the political agenda they were appointed to support, they can mobilize resources, galvanize public support, and drive policy initiatives that align with the president’s vision—ultimately benefitting the nation as a whole. Your comparison to other democratic systems, including that of the U.S., also needs careful consideration. Ministers—be they secretaries or otherwise— in many systems serve under the dictates of political appointees who share decided political objectives. The role of a minister inherently involves answering not just to the public, but also to the political leader who appointed them. It is a symbiotic relationship where loyalty to governance can coexist with loyalty to the party that reflects the will of the voters. Arguing that cabinet officials could be undermined by wearing party colors or engaging in political rallies disregards the reality that active political participation is often necessary to achieve accountability, transparency, and support for government initiatives. Ministers who are open about their political affiliations and who actively rally support can create pathways for innovative solutions and cooperative governance, all while remaining dedicated to the majority sentiments that brought them to power. Lastly, it is paramount to recognize that a healthy democracy thrives on competition, debate, and—yes—partisan engagement. The Gambia deserves ministers who can combine their political affiliations with a dedication to serve all Gambians, working from a place of shared commitment to national progress. Dismissing the political role of cabinet ministers as inherently detrimental is a simplistic view. In a dynamic political landscape, engaged and politically-aware ministers can drive the country forward, balancing party loyalty while addressing the diverse needs of our populace. In conclusion, rather than viewing the involvement of ministers in political matters as a detriment, we must appreciate their role in furthering the political agenda of the government they serve, recognizing that this is a vital feature of a functional democracy. Sincerely, Yaya Dampha

Rebuttal to Alagi Yorro Jallow's Editorial on Cabinet Ministers in The Gambia:

Dear Alagi Yorro Jallow, Your editorial presents a well-articulated perspective on the role of cabinet ministers in The Gambia and their apparent entanglement in partisan politics. While it is essential to uphold ethical governance and professionalism in public service, your argument fundamentally overlooks a crucial aspect of our political system—one that is particularly defined by its unique context and the expectations set by our current democratic framework. Firstly, it is essential to recognize that in The Gambia, cabinet ministers are not merely technocrats serving in a vacuum of neutrality; they are politically appointed by the president to assist in implementing his government’s policies and programs. This political appointment is by design, rooted in the expectation that ministers will actively support the agenda of the ruling party. It is a model that reflects the democratic principle of accountability and representation. If ministers were to detach entirely from their political affiliations, they would be neglecting their primary responsibilities and failing to advocate for the policies that resonate with the electorate. Your suggestion that Gambian ministers should emulate their counterparts in the United States assumes a one-size-fits-all approach to governance that disregards the importance of context. While it is true that cabinet secretaries in the U.S. are expected to navigate their roles with a degree of political impartiality, it is also essential to acknowledge that the political dynamics and historical evolution of governance in the U.S. are vastly different from those in The Gambia. Here, ministers acting as political agents can foster greater engagement with the citizens who voted for the ruling party, ensuring that the voices of the electorate are heard within government deliberations. This loyalty not only solidifies the government’s mandate but also fosters a sense of accountability that is crucial in a developing democracy. Moreover, your editorial paints participation in party activities as a negative phenomenon that erodes institutional integrity. I contend that when ministers wear “Ashobi” and engage in party rallies, they are embodying the spirit of political engagement that is necessary for any evolving democracy. Such participation serves to remind citizens that their government is not distant but rather deeply connected to their aspirations and commitments. This direct engagement can strengthen public trust and confidence in governance, so long as it is conducted with an eye toward serving the collective good.

While it is critical to maintain professionalism and avoid the pitfalls of corruption and nepotism, it is equally vital not to impose a sterile definition of governance that disregards the rich socio-political fabric of The Gambia. Ministers are not merely passive functionaries but active proponents of change who wield influence to implement the policies that align with their party’s developmental agenda. As long as their actions aim toward the betterment of the nation, their political affiliation can be a source of strength rather than a hindrance. Furthermore, your assertion that ministers exhibit prioritization of party politics over national interest seems to imply a lack of nuance regarding the real-world intricacies of governance. The reality is that often, party interests and national interests are intertwined. A robust political will can translate into impactful governance, paving the way for significant advancements in the areas of development, education, health, and infrastructure. It is entirely possible for ministers to champion party initiatives that simultaneously align with national needs, thereby creating a symbiotic relationship between politics and governance. In conclusion, while professionalism in public service is indispensable, the call for complete detachment from partisan politics overlooks a foundational element of our governance model. Ministers must balance their loyalty to the ruling party with their commitment to the broader populace, embodying a dynamic leadership that is responsive to the needs of citizens. In a democracy, the political connection of ministers is not a flaw but rather a feature that allows for governance that is not only representative but also vibrant and engaged. The challenge lies not in extinguishing the political fire within our ministers, but rather in harnessing that fire to ignite meaningful change for all Gambians. Sincerely, Yaya Dampha Coordinator NPP Diaspora

Editorial The Critical Challenge of Cabinet Ministers in Partisan Politics.

By Alagi Yorro Jallow.

Part 1 Fatoumatta: In a democracy, governance must rise above the fray of partisan theatrics; yet in The Gambia, cabinet ministers are increasingly mired in party politics, which severely undermines institutional integrity. Instead of embodying national service, they often showcase loyalty to the ruling party, transforming their roles into mere extensions of political allegiance. This alarming trend raises a crucial question: Should ministers act as political agents, or should they uphold the principles of neutrality and professionalism in serving the nation? Cabinet ministers in The Gambia are progressively entwined in partisan politics, creating significant concerns about the integrity of our governance. This entanglement leads ministers to prioritize party interests over the collective needs of the nation, often demonstrated by their overt endorsement of party policies that may not best serve the public good. Unlike their counterparts in other nations who maintain an impartial stance in public service, Gambian ministers frequently don in “Ashobi”, ruling party attire and engage in political rallies. This blurring of lines between governance and partisanship erodes the professionalism essential for effective national service. Historically, the 1970 constitution permitted politicians and parliamentarians to serve as cabinet ministers, a provision intended to ensure representation of the people’s political choices. However, this was later abolished to enhance governmental independence. Today, we observe ministers actively participating in party activities, betraying the core principle that public servants should represent the entire nation, not just a narrow political faction. Fatoumatta: Today, cabinet ministers flaunt their allegiance to the ruling party, donning "Ashobi" clothing at political events, including the inauguration of National People’s Party (NPP) offices. This situation demands a critical examination: Should cabinet ministers immerse themselves in party politics, or should they maintain a dignified distance from such partisan affairs? In contrast, countries like the United States exemplify a more balanced approach, where cabinet secretaries—such as the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense—engage in political matters with prudence and restraint. Unlike elected officials, their roles are not centered around political campaigning or party functions. Instead, their political involvement manifests in a more substantive way: In other democracies, cabinet secretaries serve as the President's key advisors, leading policy formulation and ensuring the government's agenda is executed effectively. This advisory role is inherently political, yet it influences national strategy and direction. They act as the public face of their respective departments, championing policies before Congress, the public, and international audiences. For example, the Secretary of State oversees foreign relations, while the Secretary of Defense manages military and national security matters. These roles, while requiring significant political engagement, are firmly rooted in the interest of the nation, rather than mere party loyalty. Despite often being appointed by the President from the same political party, cabinet secretaries are expected to serve the entire nation, transcending the interests of individual political factions. This expectation is particularly critical for positions involving diplomacy and national security, where professionalism and strategic governance must always overshadow partisan considerations. Ultimately, we must insist that our cabinet ministers prioritize the interests of national governance over the shackles of party politics. While political engagement is an inevitable aspect of policymaking, the emphasis must be on leadership, expertise, and the preservation of institutional integrity. It is imperative that we shift our focus from political theatrics to genuine and effective governance. A comparative analysis of other democracies reveals more principled practices. In the United States, cabinet secretaries engage in politics by influencing government policy and advising the President, yet they maintain a clear boundary by refraining from open political campaigning and partisan displays. Their primary duty is national service, not the promotion of party interests. The Gambian government must act decisively to address this troubling trend and restore professionalism to our leadership. Ministers must be held accountable to prioritize governance, focusing on policy and public service rather than political theatrics. Failure to uphold these standards could lead to a continued erosion of institutional integrity, ultimately threatening the very foundations of governance. Fatoumatta: By recommitting to professionalism, we can forge a future worthy of our collective investment. Governance must be rescued from the clutches of political spectacle and restored to its vital purpose—serving the nation with dignity, expertise, and foresight. If ministers fail to uphold the ideals of neutrality and discipline, The Gambia risks further degradation of institutional integrity, where governance becomes indistinguishable from partisan activism. A government that values professionalism over distraction is not merely a government; it is a beacon for a future worth defending.

Editorial: Bravo CG Darboe and Team At GRA

Bravo Mr. Commissioner General Yankuba Darboe and the esteemed team at the Gambia Revenue Authority

We at JarranewsTV wish to extend our heartfelt congratulations and commendations for the exceptional performance and monumental achievements that the Gambia Revenue Authority (GRA) has demonstrated over the past month. The D500 million revenue collection in May alone is a testament to your unwavering dedication, visionary leadership, and the relentless efforts of your entire team, particularly Mr. Saikou Balajo and Mr. Raphael Mendy, as well as the entire GRA team at the Gambia Ports.

This remarkable feat not only underscores the effectiveness of GRA’s ongoing digital transformation into Smart Customs but also showcases your commitment to enhancing operational efficiency and transparency within the revenue collection process. By harnessing cutting-edge technology, the GRA is redefining the standards for revenue collection in The Gambia and establishing a robust framework that enhances accountability and fosters a culture of excellence. Your accomplishments are not merely figures on a spreadsheet; they represent a significant milestone in the development of our nation's economic landscape. This monumental revenue collection will undoubtedly contribute to the betterment of public services and infrastructure, thus benefiting all Gambians. Your leadership has not only brought about tangible results but has also inspired confidence among stakeholders, citizens, and businesses alike. As you continue on this path of innovation and excellence, we encourage you and your team to remain steadfast in your mission. The foundation you have laid today will cultivate a brighter future for The Gambia, and for that, you deserve every bit of recognition and praise. Once again, congratulations on this significant achievement. Your hard work and commitment to excellence do not go unnoticed, and we look forward to witnessing even greater accomplishments from the Gambia Revenue Authority under your exemplary guidance. With sincere appreciation,