Rebuttal to Alagi Yorro Jallow's Editorial on Cabinet Ministers in The Gambia:

Dear Alagi Yorro Jallow, Your editorial presents a well-articulated perspective on the role of cabinet ministers in The Gambia and their apparent entanglement in partisan politics. While it is essential to uphold ethical governance and professionalism in public service, your argument fundamentally overlooks a crucial aspect of our political system—one that is particularly defined by its unique context and the expectations set by our current democratic framework. Firstly, it is essential to recognize that in The Gambia, cabinet ministers are not merely technocrats serving in a vacuum of neutrality; they are politically appointed by the president to assist in implementing his government’s policies and programs. This political appointment is by design, rooted in the expectation that ministers will actively support the agenda of the ruling party. It is a model that reflects the democratic principle of accountability and representation. If ministers were to detach entirely from their political affiliations, they would be neglecting their primary responsibilities and failing to advocate for the policies that resonate with the electorate. Your suggestion that Gambian ministers should emulate their counterparts in the United States assumes a one-size-fits-all approach to governance that disregards the importance of context. While it is true that cabinet secretaries in the U.S. are expected to navigate their roles with a degree of political impartiality, it is also essential to acknowledge that the political dynamics and historical evolution of governance in the U.S. are vastly different from those in The Gambia. Here, ministers acting as political agents can foster greater engagement with the citizens who voted for the ruling party, ensuring that the voices of the electorate are heard within government deliberations. This loyalty not only solidifies the government’s mandate but also fosters a sense of accountability that is crucial in a developing democracy. Moreover, your editorial paints participation in party activities as a negative phenomenon that erodes institutional integrity. I contend that when ministers wear “Ashobi” and engage in party rallies, they are embodying the spirit of political engagement that is necessary for any evolving democracy. Such participation serves to remind citizens that their government is not distant but rather deeply connected to their aspirations and commitments. This direct engagement can strengthen public trust and confidence in governance, so long as it is conducted with an eye toward serving the collective good.

While it is critical to maintain professionalism and avoid the pitfalls of corruption and nepotism, it is equally vital not to impose a sterile definition of governance that disregards the rich socio-political fabric of The Gambia. Ministers are not merely passive functionaries but active proponents of change who wield influence to implement the policies that align with their party’s developmental agenda. As long as their actions aim toward the betterment of the nation, their political affiliation can be a source of strength rather than a hindrance. Furthermore, your assertion that ministers exhibit prioritization of party politics over national interest seems to imply a lack of nuance regarding the real-world intricacies of governance. The reality is that often, party interests and national interests are intertwined. A robust political will can translate into impactful governance, paving the way for significant advancements in the areas of development, education, health, and infrastructure. It is entirely possible for ministers to champion party initiatives that simultaneously align with national needs, thereby creating a symbiotic relationship between politics and governance. In conclusion, while professionalism in public service is indispensable, the call for complete detachment from partisan politics overlooks a foundational element of our governance model. Ministers must balance their loyalty to the ruling party with their commitment to the broader populace, embodying a dynamic leadership that is responsive to the needs of citizens. In a democracy, the political connection of ministers is not a flaw but rather a feature that allows for governance that is not only representative but also vibrant and engaged. The challenge lies not in extinguishing the political fire within our ministers, but rather in harnessing that fire to ignite meaningful change for all Gambians. Sincerely, Yaya Dampha Coordinator NPP Diaspora