The Radicalised Partisan Imams In the Gambia

Democratic Responsibility and Reconciliation: The Role of Radicalized Partisan Imams in The Gambia’s Path to Unity and Healing.

Alagie Yerro Jallow In the vibrant landscape of Gambian democracy, religious leaders hold immense influence, both as moral guides and community pillars. As the nation continues its journey of healing and progress, the recent remarks of Imam Darou Sanyang—likening President Barrow to Pharaoh—bring into sharp focus the delicate balance between freedom of expression and responsible leadership. This controversy stems from the twisting of President Barrow’s "Meet the Banjul Elders" speech on Eid, where his observations about practices in other nations were misconstrued to fit critics’ personal narratives. Such distortions not only distract from the true intent of his message but also fuel unnecessary division. While these critiques are emblematic of the democratic freedoms cherished in The Gambia, they also highlight the urgency of using these freedoms to unite rather than divide. The mosque, a place of spiritual solace, should never become a stage for tribal politics or populist rhetoric. Instead, imams must rise above partisan agendas, channeling their influence toward fostering reconciliation, promoting civic education, and sustaining the democratic ideals that underpin The Gambia’s future. The Gambia stands at a pivotal moment in its democratic journey, navigating the challenges of healing from decades of authoritarian rule while fostering an inclusive society. Recent statements by some imams, particularly Imam Darou Sanyang, have ignited fierce debates. His comparison of President Barrow to Pharaoh, accusing him of pursuing dictatorial tendencies, underscores a broader issue: the role of religious leaders in a democratic society. While such bold criticisms might find a platform in The Gambia’s democracy, they would be inconceivable in many Islamic states where imams face tighter restrictions. This stark contrast highlights both the freedoms of democracy and the responsibilities that come with it. In his inflammatory remarks, Imam Sanyang reflects frustrations that might resonate with certain factions, but his language serves as a striking example of the freedom of expression afforded by democracy. In other Islamic nations, imams are often subject to strict governmental oversight, with sermons monitored or pre-approved to prevent dissent or divisive rhetoric. Such a system, though limiting, seeks to maintain harmony and prevent religious platforms from being politicized. In The Gambia, however, democracy has ushered in an era where imams can speak freely, even when their messages verge on the incendiary. Yet, this liberty is being tested when religious leaders cross the line into populist politics and tribal rhetoric. During Yahya Jammeh's despotic rule, many of these voices were notably absent. Their silence during that time—and their newfound outspokenness now—raises questions about the true motivations behind their critiques. Are these efforts truly aimed at promoting justice and accountability, or are they exploiting democracy for partisan or tribal agendas?

Imams occupy a vital space in Gambian society, serving as moral guides and community leaders. At a time when the nation needs healing from its past divisions, their sermons should prioritize messages of unity, reconciliation, and peace. The platform of the mosque is sacred and should not be used for political campaigning or tribal rhetoric. This misuse not only undermines the sanctity of religion but also exacerbates societal divisions, hindering the progress that democracy seeks to achieve. In many Islamic societies, imams are expected to rise above partisanship, focusing instead on the spiritual and moral upliftment of their communities. While President Barrow’s remarks about imams in other nations were misconstrued, they serve as an important reminder of the delicate balance between religious freedom and social responsibility. His comments were not a call for censorship but an observation of global practices, distorted by critics for political gain. Fatoumatta: Democracy guarantees freedom of speech and association, but these freedoms must be exercised responsibly. If imams wish to engage in politics, the constitution allows them to do so transparently by joining or forming political parties. However, hiding behind the pulpit to propagate partisan or tribal agendas is a betrayal of their spiritual mandate. Using inflammatory rhetoric, such as likening a democratically elected president to Pharaoh, risks eroding the very democratic principles that allow such expressions to exist. The government, in collaboration with the Supreme Islamic Council and the Ministry of Religious Affairs, has a responsibility to establish clear guidelines for religious leaders. These bodies can provide structured channels for imams to voice their concerns, ensuring that disagreements are addressed constructively rather than through divisive rhetoric. Civic education campaigns could also play a critical role, empowering both religious leaders and their congregations with the knowledge to navigate democracy responsibly.

The Gambia’s democracy is a precious achievement, and its preservation requires collective effort. Imams, as custodians of moral and spiritual guidance, have a unique opportunity to complement government efforts in fostering an informed, united, and active citizenry. By focusing their sermons on civic education, reconciliation, and global issues such as the plight of Palestinians or the suffering in Gaza, imams can redirect their influence toward causes that inspire solidarity rather than discord. Fatoumatta: Ultimately, this is not about silencing religious leaders but about encouraging them to use their powerful platforms for the greater good. The Gambia’s journey toward healing and progress depends on the collective commitment of all its leaders—religious, political, and civic—to uphold the principles of justice, unity, and democracy.

Response To Ndey Jobarteh

Dear Ndey I am responding to your critique in my capacity as NPP Diaspora Group Coordinator and a proud member of the NPP, the party that elected President Barrow to office. Your recent comments regarding President Barrow are indeed striking, particularly given your complete silence during the oppressive years of the Jammeh dictatorship. It’s disheartening to see someone who danced in vibrant traditional attire while our people suffered under tyranny now take a radical stance against the very democracy we fought to attain.

You’ve been noticeably absent from the struggle when our compatriots faced killings and torture, choosing instead to engage in cultural activities while the Gambian people endured unimaginable hardship. The contrast between your past actions and your current criticisms raises questions about your commitment to the welfare of our nation and its citizens. It’s no secret that your recent radicalization seems rooted in personal disappointment—particularly after your hopes of securing a job or a consulate position in Scandinavia fell through. You and your group attempted to organize a "Gambian House," which was met with rightful scrutiny from the Norwegian government, highlighting that you were not qualified for such a role. It’s troubling to see how dashed ambitions have led you to engage in undermining our government and promoting discontent among the electorate Your aim appears to create discord, and we must draw a line at allowing anyone to poison the minds of our people for personal gain. President Barrow’s statements have been in line with what many see as valid expressions of the challenges we face today. He is not threatening anyone; rather, he is calling attention to the misuse of democracy that has turned many into loud activists with little regard for constructive dialogue. While we appreciate your past contributions, we will not tolerate attempts to distort the reality of our democratic progress in the Gambia or attacks on PresidentAdamaBarrow who is working tirelessly to maintain peace and stability. Yes, President Barrow has his faults, as do all leaders, but he has brought us a greater measure of freedom compared to the days of oppression we once lived through. As encouraged as you might feel to amplify dissent, we—and many others—will steadfastly defend our party and our president against the fabrications and divisive rhetoric that threaten to tear apart the fabric of our democracy. peace time heroes will not be allow to control the narratives of our struggle posing as if they were there during the dark days. Eid Mubarak to you all. Yaya Dampha NPP Coordinator in the Diaspora

Tribute To Retired General Lamin Bojang A Soldier with Difference

A Tribute to Retired General Lamin Bojang: A Life of Service and Dedication Inna illahi wa inna illahi Rajoun. Alagi Yorro Jallow The Gambia mourns the loss of one of its most distinguished sons, Retired General Lamin Bojang, whose passing marks the end of a remarkable journey defined by service, leadership, and unwavering commitment to his nation. General Bojang was not only a decorated military officer but also a diplomat and a political leader who dedicated his life to the betterment of his country and its people.

As a military officer, General Bojang exemplified discipline, courage, and integrity. His years of service in the armed forces were marked by a steadfast dedication to duty and a deep sense of patriotism. He was a leader who inspired those under his command, earning their respect and admiration through his unwavering principles and commitment to excellence. Beyond his military career, General Bojang transitioned into the political arena, where he served as the party leader and Secretary General of the Alliance for National Reorientation and Development (ANRD). In this role, he championed the values of unity, progress, and national development, striving to create a brighter future for The Gambia. His vision for the nation was one of inclusivity and reorientation, where every citizen could contribute to the collective growth and prosperity of the country. As a diplomat, General Bojang represented The Gambia with distinction in Guinea Bissau. His tenure as a diplomat was a testament to his ability to build bridges and foster meaningful relationships, reflecting his deep understanding of the importance of diplomacy in advancing national interests. General Bojang's life was not only one of public service but also of personal devotion. His recent return to The Gambia to observe Laylatul Qadr with his family underscores his commitment to his faith and his loved ones. It is a poignant reminder of the values that guided his life—faith, family, and service.

The passing of General Bojang is a profound loss for The Gambia. He leaves behind a legacy of leadership, dedication, and an unwavering commitment to the ideals of service and nation-building. His contributions to the military, politics, and diplomacy will be remembered as a testament to his enduring love for his country. As we bid farewell to this extraordinary leader, let us honor his memory by upholding the values he stood for and striving to build the nation he envisioned. May his soul rest in eternal peace, and may his family find solace in the knowledge that his life was one of profound impact and purpose. Rest in peace, Retired General Lamin Bojang. Your legacy will forever remain etched in the hearts of those you served and inspired. May Allah grant him Alijaanh Firdausi.

The Duality of Sergeant Essa Bokar Sey's Critiques and Career

By Alagi Yorro Jallow Sergeant Essa Bokar Sey’s career trajectory and his pattern of critique present a striking irony. Historically, Sey has maintained silence while holding government appointments, but becomes a vocal critic when excluded from such roles. His primary arguments focus on government inefficiency and lethargy, which he attributes to nepotism and loyalty-based appointments rather than merit. Yet, his own rise to prominence under former dictator Yahya Jammeh underscores his connection to the very system he criticizes.

As a member of the Gendarmerie and a close ally of Jammeh, Sey was appointed ambassador to global powerhouses such as China, France, and the United States. This appointment came despite lacking a university degree or credentials befitting an ambassador. These ambassadorial roles, typically reserved for higher-ranking officials with proven expertise, highlight the prevalence of nepotism and loyalty over merit during Jammeh's regime. Sey’s diplomatic career not only exemplifies this system but also raises questions about the sincerity of his current critiques. In his public statements and social media posts, Sey frequently decries the detrimental effects of favoritism and inefficiency in civil service appointments. He has argued that these practices result in mismatched roles, leading to systemic dysfunction. However, the paradox of his critiques lies in his own history of benefiting from these very dynamics. His ambassadorial appointment under Jammeh—a product of personal connection rather than merit—exemplifies the system’s flaws.

This duality is emblematic of a broader phenomenon within governance: the control of narratives by former enablers of oppressive systems. Critics who rise through nepotism and later denounce the system often undermine the credibility of their arguments. Constructive criticism is essential for accountability and progress, but its integrity is compromised when it is wielded as a tool for personal gain or political leverage. In The Gambia, the dynamics of criticism and governance remain complex. Genuine accountability requires consistency and a commitment to principles over self-interest. The evolving narratives of individuals like Sergeant Essa Bokar Sey demonstrate the urgent need for systemic reform, rooted in merit-based recruitment and governance that prioritizes the common good over personal loyalty.

Editorial MCA's Vigilant Governance: A Milestone in Gambian Public Health

By Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: In a monumental victory for public health, the Ministry of Health and its Medicines Control Agency (MCA) have once again reaffirmed their unyielding dedication to the well-being of Gambians. Their bold decision to temporarily close Opticalia’s Senegambia branch following a routine inspection that uncovered unlicensed eye-drop bottles sends a powerful message: the health and safety of Gambians are of the utmost importance. This rapid response not only prioritizes consumer safety but also underscores a commitment to ensuring that the welfare of the Gambian population is absolutely non-negotiable. Dr. Essa Marena, the MCA’s Executive Director, confirmed that the inspection uncovered drugs imported without the necessary approval or licensing, in flagrant violation of our stringent regulations. In response, the MCA swiftly seized these unauthorized products and has signaled that sanctions—ranging from administrative fines to possible prosecution—will follow, depending on Opticalia’s response. This bold intervention is not merely an act of regulatory compliance; it is a safeguard against harm—a shining example of proactive vigilance that prevents potential disasters before they unfold. In a marketplace where unapproved drugs can often masquerade as safe, the MCA’s rigorous oversight ensures that only the highest standards of quality, safety, and efficacy prevail. Coupled with the broader “Unapproved Drugs Initiative,” which seeks to purge our market of substandard and dangerous medications, these actions reinforce the foundation of a secure healthcare system. They also serve as a poignant reminder that the risks of unregulated substances are too dire to ignore—a lesson that history has etched deeply in our collective memory. The memory of the tragic cough syrup crisis, which claimed the lives of an estimated 66 Gambian children due to toxic chemical contamination, looms large. All children affected suffered acute kidney damage and an inability to urinate, prompting intervention by the World Health Organization (WHO) when medical officials observed a surge in such cases among children under five in late July 2022. The crisis underscored the devastating consequences of negligence and inadequate oversight in drug importation and distribution. Through these efforts, pharmacists and healthcare professionals are reminded to exercise due diligence, ensuring that only verified and approved medicines reach the hands of the public. With informal markets sometimes circulating potentially perilous products, the MCA’s preemptive stance is not only timely but vital to safeguarding our communities. Fatoumatta: The MCA’s resolute initiative in acting against Opticalia epitomizes the kind of leadership that protects our citizens from negligence and greed. It is a call to action—a message that all Gambians can find solace in knowing that their health is defended by institutions ready to act decisively in the face of danger.The Ministry of Health and MCA’s recent action against Opticalia demonstrates their commitment to protecting Gambians from harm and preserving public trust. This level of accountability, combined with ongoing reforms and international support, can pave the way for safer healthcare systems in The Gambia. Gambians deserve nothing less than the utmost dedication to their well-being.

The Rise of The Fift Columnists A New Threat To The Gambia

By Alagi Yorro Jallow A Dire Threat to the Future of Gambian Democracy. The Gambia’s transition from dictatorship to democracy stands as an inspiring symbol of hope and resilience. The peaceful ousting of Yahya Jammeh’s oppressive regime showcased the power of citizens uniting to reclaim their voices and assert their democratic rights. However, democracy is not merely a destination; it demands continual engagement, vigilance, and unwavering commitment to its core principles. Today, The Gambia confronts a new and insidious threat to its hard-won progress—the rise of fifth columnists. Fifth columnists are individuals or groups who operate secretly within a nation, organization, or institution to sabotage and destabilize it, often serving the interests of external adversaries. They employ various subversive tactics, including espionage, sabotage, propaganda, and misinformation campaigns, with the ultimate goal of undermining the very foundation of their target. Their covert operations, both online and offline, are designed to incite public outrage, deepen societal divisions, foment ethnic or ideological tensions, and erode trust in democratic institutions. In The Gambia, the term “fifth columnist” has increasingly become a rallying cry, signaling a growing awareness of the internal threats facing the nation’s emerging democracy. These subversive actors exploit weaknesses within the system to advance their own agendas, often using strategies that incite toxic populism, disseminate falsehoods, and manipulate public sentiment. The consequences of their actions can be politically devastating, sowing discord and paving the way for regime instability and potential upheaval. Their methods are not just damaging; they are a harbinger of significant societal and political turmoil. Fatoumatta: The phrase "fifth column" has its roots in the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), when Nationalist General Emilio Mola infamously declared that, as his four columns of troops marched toward Madrid, a "fifth column" of insurgents and sympathizers within the city would rise to support them. Although the actual impact of these insurgents remains debated, the term has since become synonymous with internal betrayal and the peril of subversion from within. Throughout history, the concept of a fifth column has been applied to various political and social contexts. During World War II, fears of infiltration led to widespread paranoia and, tragically, unjust persecution, as seen in the internment of Japanese Americans in the U.S.

Today, the term has evolved to encompass a new reality, highlighting internal threats within politics, governance, and even the corporate sector. In the digital age, fifth columnists extend their reach beyond physical infiltration; they navigate the online realm, harnessing the power of social media and digital platforms to disseminate disinformation, sow discord, and undermine established institutions. In The Gambia, we witness this phenomenon manifesting through unverified reports and anonymous articles crafted to incite public fury and delegitimize credible institutions. The motivations behind these efforts are evident—destabilization and exploitation for political or ideological gain. Cloaked in the guise of activism or journalism, fifth columnists exploit the trust of the public and the freedoms safeguarded by democracy. Their true aim is not to promote the common good; rather, they seek to serve hidden agendas aligned with personal or political ambitions. By spreading false narratives and igniting division, they erode public confidence in the very institutions that uphold democracy. This calculated chaos creates a fertile ground for instability, undermining the democratic progress that Gambians have strived to achieve. It is imperative that the citizens of The Gambia remain vigilant and united against this new threat. The survival of democracy depends on our collective resolve to stand against those who seek to undermine it. Together, we must protect the hard-fought gains of our democratic journey and ensure that the spirit of resilience and hope continues to shine brightly in our nation. Fatoumatta: Figures like George Christensen and Swaebou Conateh, along with other dedicated independent journalists, stand as exemplars of integrity in the ongoing fight for democracy. Christensen’s fearless reporting during critical moments, such as the April 2000 student demonstrations, and Conateh’s steadfast commitment to the truth serve as powerful reminders of the essential role that genuine journalism plays in unifying society. Their legacies starkly contrast with those of fifth columnists—individuals who betray the foundational trust that journalism and activism are meant to uphold. In our digital age, the reach and impact of these fifth columnists have expanded exponentially. They adeptly harness social media and online platforms to disseminate disinformation on a staggering scale. Anonymous articles and unverified stories spread rapidly, igniting public outrage and deepening ethnic and political divisions. These are not mere side effects of political discourse; they are deliberate efforts to distort public perception and destabilize governance. Modern democracies are grappling with severe security threats—misinformation, political subversion, and social unrest—that often reflect the manipulative tactics of fifth column activities. These crises rarely occur by chance; they are orchestrated by unseen actors who exploit situations for their political advantage. In The Gambia, this alarming trend is increasingly clear, as the rampant spread of unverified information and incendiary rhetoric erodes national unity and undermines trust in our leaders. Fifth columnists systematically exploit the weaknesses of digital platforms, amplifying their divisive narratives and distorting public discourse. Their strategies not only undermine confidence in democratic institutions but also erode the very foundations of our society, making our institutions more vulnerable to collapse. Such actions pose a grave threat to the hard-won progress in democracy, press freedom, and social cohesion that we have strived to achieve. For Gambians, this presents a critical and urgent challenge: how do we safeguard our democracy from those who seek to exploit it? The answer lies in vigilance and accountability. We must question the motives of those who claim to champion our causes. True activists and journalists stand firm on the principles of truth, justice, and societal advancement, while fifth columnists forsake these ideals, using them merely as a disguise for their subversive agendas. The rise of the fifth columnist in The Gambia is a sobering reminder of how fragile our democratic progress can be. To protect our democracy and ensure social cohesion, we must remain resolute against these internal threats. Identifying their tactics and exposing their motives are crucial steps in diminishing their influence. As a nation, we must reaffirm our steadfast commitment to transparency and accountability, along with the values that sustain our democracy. Let us truly “beware the Ides of March.” This phrase serves not only as a historical cautionary reminder but as a clarion call to action—an urgent plea to defend the hard-won successes of our democratic journey. This is a defining moment for The Gambia. The freedoms and rights we have gained after enduring years of oppression must not be wasted; they must be fiercely protected. Fatoumatta: By uniting against fifth columnists and recommitting ourselves to the principles of democracy, we can secure a brighter future. Let this be a rallying cry for all Gambians—a powerful acknowledgment that the work of democracy is never complete and that its protection demands our collective responsibility.