Bubscarr Bob Keita and His Associates: A Warning to Gambians

By Yaya Dampha Coordinator NPP Diaspora

As Gambians prepare for the 2026 presidential elections, it is crucial to recognize the political posturing of individuals like Bubscarr Bob Keita and his associates. Their attempts to capture the spotlight and manipulate public sentiment reveal a troubling agenda, one that poses significant risks for our nation. Bob Keita, once entangled in a highly publicized legal case surrounding serious allegations, may have momentarily garnered attention and misguided support. However, it is essential to understand that any popularity gained during such tumultuous times does not equate to genuine public trust or integrity. Many supporters during his trial may have been motivated by a desire to protect men from unsubstantiated accusations, yet this does not excuse or validate his actions. The reality remains that those who engage in questionable behavior do not possess the character necessary to lead our country.

The upcoming elections provide an opportunity for Gambians to reflect critically on the qualifications of those vying for political power. We must prioritize leaders who embody integrity, maturity, and a genuine commitment to serving the people. In contrast to Keita and his associates, President Adama Barrow and the NPP are focused on fostering a stable and productive environment for all Gambians. Under his leadership, we can continue to build a brighter future, grounded in trust and accountability. It is evident that individuals with dubious backgrounds cannot be entrusted with the responsibilities of governance. The era of relying on clowns and disruptors to steer our political direction must end. The youth protests we have witnessed are a call to action, not just for political change, but for a deeper understanding of the qualities we seek in our leaders.

Let us stand firmly behind President Adama Barrow and the NPP, as they work tirelessly to protect the interests of The Gambia. Together, we can ensure that our nation is led by those who truly aspire to contribute positively to our society, rather than those who seek to capitalize on chaos and confusion. It's time to prioritize character and vision in our quest for true representation and leadership.

Editorial: Where Was The Outrage Before No

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

The Great Gambian Blindspot: Where Was the Outrage Before Now? Selective Outrage: Why Are Protesters Ignoring the 2011 Tax Evasion Inquiry Commission? Accountability Must Be Universal, Not Selective. Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: Activism thrives on accountability, justice, and transparency—but what happens when activists themselves engage in selective outrage? As Gambians rally in protest demanding government disclosure of Yahya Jammeh’s asset buyers, one glaring contradiction remains: Where was this same energy when the 2011 Tax Evasion Inquiry Commission uncovered powerful elites dodging their fiscal responsibilities? Where were the protests when Justice Mama Fatima Singhateh’s commission exposed a web of financial misconduct among lawyers, corporate giants, and state figures? Instead of mass mobilization, there was silence. Instead of calls for justice, there was indifference. And now, suddenly, the streets are filled with voices claiming to fight for transparency—but transparency for whom? If activists and their supporters truly stand for accountability, then why have they ignored systemic corruption beyond Jammeh’s regime? This movement must confront uncomfortable truths, because justice is not real if it is selective. Fatoumatta: As Gambians rally for accountability and transparency, demanding answers about Yahya Jammeh’s looted assets, one glaring question remains unanswered: Why is there no outrage over the damning findings of the 2011 Tax Evasion Inquiry Commission? This commission, chaired by Justice Mama Fatima Singhateh, exposed powerful and influential lawyers, business elites, and professionals who failed to pay their taxes—a direct betrayal of the nation’s economic integrity. Some even challenged their tax liabilities in the Supreme Court, attempting to evade responsibility through legal maneuvering rather than compliance.

Yet, where are today’s protesters, who claim to be fighting for justice and transparency? Their silence on this issue reveals a troubling inconsistency—one that suggests political opportunism rather than genuine activism. If transparency is truly the goal, then activists must confront all forms of corruption—not just the ones that fit political narratives. The 2011 Tax Evasion Inquiry Commission uncovered widespread financial misconduct, yet no sustained movement emerged to demand consequences for those implicated. Instead, many of the same voices now calling for protests against Jammeh’s asset sales were silent when elite professionals dodged taxes, depriving the state of critical revenue. This selective outrage raises serious questions: Why was there no mass mobilization when the commission exposed tax evasion among powerful figures? Why do activists ignore systemic corruption beyond Jammeh’s regime? Are protests truly about justice, or are they being shaped by political convenience? True accountability must be consistent—not cherry-picked based on political expediency. Fatoumatta: Activism should never be reduced to a tool for political maneuvering. Yet, many protesters today risk becoming pawns, blindly following narratives shaped by political elites rather than engaging in independent, critical advocacy. The silence on the 2011 Tax Evasion Inquiry Commission suggests that some activists are willing to overlook corruption when it does not serve their immediate agenda. But justice is not selective—it must be pursued wherever wrongdoing exists, whether it involves former presidents, business elites, or influential lawyers. If Gambians truly want transparency, they must demand accountability across all sectors, not just where it is politically convenient. The fight for justice and transparency must be rooted in principle, not political calculation. If protesters ignore past corruption while selectively targeting certain figures, they risk undermining the credibility of their movement.

The 2011 Tax Evasion Inquiry Commission was a critical moment in The Gambia’s history, exposing deep-rooted financial misconduct. Yet, it was met with silence. If activists truly stand for accountability, they must demand justice for all forms of corruption—not just the ones that fit political narratives. The question remains: Will Gambians fight for real transparency, or will they continue to be pawns in a selective battle?

Statement Condemning Intimidation of Investigative Journalist Mustapha K. Darboe

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

The blatant attempt by leaders of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the Media Council of The Gambia (MCG) to pressure The Republic newspaper into exonerating former Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambadou is an unacceptable assault on press freedom and investigative journalism.

Journalists do not exist to sanitize reputations or shield public figures from scrutiny—they exist to expose truth, hold power accountable, and inform the public. The April 30 investigative report, “The Assets of Gambia’s Former Dictator Go for a Song,” raised serious concerns about corruption and lack of transparency in the sale of Yahya Jammeh’s assets. Instead of addressing these concerns through lawful and transparent means, NHRC Chair Emmanuel Daniel Joof, MCG Executive Secretary Bai Emil Touray, and MCG Governing Council Chair Baboucarr Cham resorted to intimidation tactics, summoning Editor-in-Chief Mustapha K. Darboe to demand a joint statement clearing Tambadou of wrongdoing. This brazen attempt to manipulate the narrative is not only a violation of journalistic ethics but also a dangerous precedent for press suppression. The insinuation that Darboe was paid to conduct the investigation is a baseless and defamatory attack on his credibility, designed to discredit legitimate reporting and silence independent voices. We unequivocally condemn this intimidation and demand the following: 1. An immediate end to all forms of pressure and coercion against The Republic newspaper and its journalists. 2. A public apology from NHRC and MCG leaders for their attempt to interfere with independent journalism. 3. A reaffirmation of press freedom by all institutions tasked with upholding democratic values. The Gambia Press Union (GPU) has rightly called out this unethical interference, warning that journalistic integrity must never be compromised to serve political interests. The proposal to “tweak the facts” is a direct attack on truth and public trust—and must be rejected outright. Journalists must be free to investigate, report, and expose wrongdoing without fear of retaliation. The Gambian people deserve transparency, accountability, and an unwavering commitment to press freedom. We stand in solidarity with Mustapha K. Darboe and all journalists who refuse to be silenced. Alagi Yorro Jallow Former Executive Member of the Gambia and Emeritus Journalist.

Editorial: GALA Misguided in Their Approach

The newly established activist group, Gambians Against Loathed Assets (GALA), appears to be misinformed about the legal framework governing protests in The Gambia. Rather than effectively advocating for change, their tactics of public demonstrations echo sentiments from a time when free expression was met with harsh repression. Just a few years ago, many Gambians lived in fear of dissent under a dictatorship where any attempt to protest could lead to dire consequences, including imprisonment or, in some cases, even death. Today, however, Gambians can apply for permits to hold public demonstrations without fear of government retaliation. This shift illustrates a significant move towards freedom and democracy in our country. Despite this progress, it is essential to recognize that the right to protest is governed by the Public Order Act, which mandates obtaining police clearance to hold public gatherings. This law has undergone scrutiny and has been upheld by various courts, including the Gambia Court of Appeal and the ECOWAS Court, as evidenced by notable cases involving the United Democratic Party leaders.

Regrettably, some so-called human rights activists, journalists, and political figures—who once cowered under the regime of Yahya Jammeh—are now misleading our youth. They risk jeopardizing the future of these young people by encouraging protest actions that could lead to legal troubles. The recent actions of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) serve as a stark reminder of this environment. In a disturbing turn of events, the NHRC leadership pressured the publisher of a critical investigative report to publicly vouch for former Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambadou. This move raises significant questions about the integrity and independence of our institutions. The Gambia Press Union (GPU) has condemned such pressure tactics, which undermine journalistic freedom and professionalism. The allegations against investigative reporting should be met with transparency and accountability, not coercion or intimidation. The GPU strongly asserts that the rights of journalists to provide accurate and balanced information must be preserved without external interference. As citizens of The Gambia, it is imperative to discern the motivations behind such advocacy and to engage in a manner that respects our evolving democratic framework. TRUE progress lies in fostering dialogue and understanding within the bounds of our laws, rather than descending into chaos that endangers our hard-won freedoms. Let us not be swayed by misguided leaders but rather advocate for our rights in constructive and lawful ways.

The Public Order Act Is Still Law

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

The Public Order Act: A Law of Controversy, But Still the Law. The Danger of Misinformation in Legal Discourse. The Case of Ousainou Darboe: A Legal Precedent. Alagi Yorro Jallow Few laws in The Gambia’s legal framework spark as much debate and contention as the Public Order Act. While critics argue that it is anti-democratic, the reality remains: it is a legitimate and enforceable law. Those who invoke constitutional principles must do so with accuracy and integrity, avoiding misinformation or political distortion. The Public Order Act has been tested in court, challenged at the highest judicial levels, and remains legally binding. It is not a relic of dictatorship, nor is it an arbitrary tool of suppression—it is a law that has survived judicial scrutiny, including cases brought by prominent political figures.

The Case of Ousainou Darboe: A Legal Precedent One of the most high-profile challenges to the Public Order Act came from Lawyer Ousainou Darboe, leader of the United Democratic Party (UDP). In 2016, Darboe and the UDP executive were arrested, tried, and convicted under this law for participating in unauthorized protests. Seeking justice, Darboe appealed his conviction at multiple levels: • The Appeal Courts • The Supreme Court • The ECOWAS Court Yet, each appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the legal validity of the Public Order Act. The courts upheld the government’s authority to regulate public demonstrations, confirming that while protest is a constitutional right, it must adhere to legal procedures. This ruling sets a precedent—one that activists and legal commentators must acknowledge when discussing the law. In an era where social media amplifies narratives, it is imperative that discussions surrounding legal matters remain fact-based and intellectually honest. The Public Order Act is often misrepresented, with commentators twisting its provisions to fit political agendas. Conduct thorough legal research—understanding court rulings and precedents. Avoid political distortion—ensuring legal arguments remain objective. Uphold integrity in discussions—promoting fact-based activism rather than misleading rhetoric.

The Public Order Act remains a valid law, upheld by The Gambia’s highest courts. While its democratic implications can be debated, its legal standing is indisputable. Those who invoke constitutional principles must do so with accuracy, ensuring that public discourse remains informed, responsible, and free from manipulation. Justice is not served through misinformation—it is upheld through fact-based legal challenges. If activists wish to contest the Public Order Act, they must do so through judicial processes, not through distorted narratives.The law is not perfect, but it is the law—and until it is successfully challenged, it remains binding.

GAF Warns Essa Faal And Samsudeen Sarr ToCease Misleading Statements

The Gambia Armed Forces (GAF) has issued a press release cautioning former Army Commander Samsudeen Sarr and aspiring presidential candidate Essa Mbaye Faal against making misleading public statements that misuse the name of the Armed Forces for political gain. GAF expressed serious concern about a trend of unfounded commentary surrounding its operations within the democratic framework of The Gambia. The military institution highlighted specific remarks from Sarr, who referenced an isolated incident involving the Senegalese Gendarmerie and questioned the presence of GAF soldiers at key security installations. Such narratives, according to GAF, misrepresent the professionalism and non-partisan nature of the military.

Faal, in a recent interview, alleged government neglect of the GAF, claims that GAF describes as unfounded and potentially harmful. Such assertions politicize the Armed Forces, eroding public confidence in an institution committed to reform and accountable under democratic civilian authority. The GAF High Command condemned these unethical comments, which they believe detract from national cohesion and could compromise security. They reiterated their commitment to professional standards and operational integrity in alignment with the Security Sector Reform agenda.

In its statement, GAF called on Sarr and other public figures to refrain from disparaging the military. The Armed Forces also urged political parties and media outlets, including West Coast Radio, to uphold professional ethics and avoid involving the military in political discourse. GAF reaffirmed its dedication to maintaining peace and security in The Gambia and contributing to the nation’s socio-economic development. They encouraged all Gambians to support the Armed Forces in its mission to transform into a professional and democratically accountable institution. Signed, Colonel Lamin K. Sanyang Director of Press and Public Relations Gambia Armed Forces 6 May 2025

In Defence of Lawyer Mai Ahmad Fatty

By Yaya Dampha

Mai Ahmad Fatty’s bravery and dedication to the cause of democracy in The Gambia cannot be overstated. His willingness to confront the oppressive regime of Yahya Jammeh, even in the face of life-threatening dangers, exemplifies true courage. The assassination attempt where a truck was deliberately driven into his car serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which dictators will go to silence dissent.

Despite these harrowing experiences, Fatty’s resilience shone through as he not only survived but also became a pivotal figure in the fight for democratic governance in The Gambia. By founding his own political party and rallying support from the Gambian diaspora, he has played an instrumental role in advocating for democracy and human rights. Mai Ahmad Fatty deserves respect and recognition for his contributions to the struggle for freedom in The Gambia. His story is a testament to the power of perseverance and the importance of standing up against tyranny. It is vital that we remember and honor his sacrifices, ensuring that they are woven into the fabric of our nation's history as we continue to strive for a brighter future.Mai Ahmad Fatty’s advocacy and political engagement reflect a commitment to the progress and development of The Gambia a commitment underscored by the tangible advancements achieved under President Adama Barrow’s leadership. In a nation that has long suffered from neglect and mismanagement, it is vital to recognize the critical developments that have unfolded in recent years.

Under President Barrow, The Gambia has witnessed a transformation in infrastructure, with road networks expanding to connect communities that have long been isolated. Access to electricity has reached the most remote areas, illuminating lives that were previously shrouded in darkness and deprivation. Healthcare services have improved significantly, making essential medical care accessible to the marginalized populations that had been overlooked for decades. Education services have also seen reinvigoration, providing opportunities for the youth and fostering a brighter future for our nation

Mai Ahmad Fatty’s acknowledgment of these achievements is not merely political maneuvering; it is a testament to his dedication to the well-being of Gambians. Recognizing the progress made under the current administration is crucial in fostering a constructive dialogue focused on the future. While the struggle for democracy and human rights continues, it is equally important to celebrate the milestones that have been reached and to encourage more development-oriented initiatives for the benefit of all citizens. As we reflect on the journey towards a democratic and prosperous Gambia, let us embrace a spirit of collaboration and constructive criticism. Mai Ahmad Fatty’s endorsement of developmental progress is an invitation to all political actors to prioritize the needs of the Gambian people above partisan squabbling. It is a call to work together in a shared commitment to create a society where every individual can thrive, benefiting from the liberties won through decades of struggle.

In recognizing the positive strides made, we bolster our collective spirit and empower ourselves to continue the fight for a better Gambia—one that honors both our past and our aspirations for the future. Let us support leaders like Mai Ahmad Fatty, who advocate not only for justice and accountability but who also appreciate the importance of development in building a stronger, more united nation. If someone sacrificed a minute for you try to respect them for a second.

The NPP Government's Commitment to Reform and Progress

Defending Accountability: The NPP Government's Commitment to Reform and Progress The recent dismissal of over one thousand workers in The Gambia, identified as "ghost workers" in a thorough audit, has ignited a wave of political criticism, primarily from certain journalists and opposition figures. These individuals have rushed to politicize the issue, alleging that the NPP government is to blame for employing these non-existent workers. However, such claims overlook the significant strides the government has taken towards accountability and reform within the labor sector. The term "ghost workers" refers to those who remain on official payrolls yet are neither present nor contributing to their organizations. This issue is not unique to The Gambia; it has been a persistent challenge in various countries worldwide, especially in developing nations where systems of monitoring and accountability may not be as robust.

Acknowledging the Reality of Unaccounted Workers Critics tend to focus solely on the recent firings, ignoring crucial factors that have led to this situation. Many of the affected employees were engaged in roles that did not involve regular clocking in—such as field workers in agriculture or education. The lack of digital timekeeping tools in these sectors presents a challenge in tracking actual attendance, making it easier for discrepancies to arise.

The NPP government has shown a commitment to addressing these fundamental issues. By undertaking a comprehensive audit to identify ghost workers, the administration has demonstrated its dedication to transparency and efficiency. This proactive approach signifies that the government is not only interested in worker accountability but also in ensuring that public resources are utilized effectively for the benefit of the Gambian people. Progress Amid Criticism It is crucial to recognize that the broader issue of ghost workers is exacerbated by economic migration and systemic inefficiencies—factors that have been longstanding challenges in our society. Many young civil servants, seeking better opportunities abroad, have left their posts, resulting in discrepancies in employment records. Instead of placing the blame on the government, journalists and critics should consider the complex socio-economic landscape that contributes to these challenges.

Moreover, while some journalists paint the narrative of governmental negligence, they fail to acknowledge the progress the NPP government has made. The introduction of modern work practices and technology is vital for mitigating the risk of ghost workers. By investing in digital solutions and transparent labor management systems, the NPP is taking significant steps to reform the public sector workforce. A Call for Constructive Engagement It is essential for journalists and commentators to engage constructively with these developments rather than resorting to politically charged accusations. The endless cycle of blame only serves to create division rather than fostering a cooperative atmosphere that can lead to meaningful change. The NPP government is tirelessly working towards building a transparent, accountable, and efficient public service, and we—all stakeholders—should support this mission.

In conclusion, rather than focusing solely on the issue of ghost workers through a polarizing lens, we should recognize the commendable efforts made by the NPP government to enhance accountability in the workforce. Embracing a collaborative approach to address these concerns can lead to a more effective governance model that ultimately benefits all Gambians. It is time to champion constructive dialogue and support the government's initiatives for a better, more accountable future.

Fugitive Wandy Simaga Convicted for Firearm Possession Following Airport Escape

Wandy Simaga Found Guilty After Dramatic Escape and Subsequent Arrest The Gambia Police Force has confirmed the conviction of Wandy Simaga, a fugitive who escaped from custody at Banjul International Airport on September 28, 2024. Simaga had been on the run until his capture on April 13, 2025, following an extensive manhunt. Upon arriving in The Gambia aboard a Vueling Airline flight, Simaga was intercepted by security personnel and found in possession of two pistols, eight pepper sprays, and thirteen mobile phones, all suspected to be contraband. During a high-risk screening conducted by various law enforcement agencies, he managed to evade capture and escape the scene.

Following his recapture, Simaga was arraigned before Her Worship Anna O. Mendy, Principal Magistrate at the Brikama Magistrates’ Court. He faced two serious charges: 1. Importation of prohibited firearms, in violation of Section 6 of the Arms and Ammunition Act (Cap 20:01) 2. Possession of firearms without authority, contrary to Section 8 of the same Act. In court, the charges were read and explained to Simaga in Mandinka, to which he pleaded guilty. He accepted the facts presented without objection. As a result, he was convicted and sentenced as follows: - Count One: a fine of D100,000 or two years’ imprisonment - Count Two: a fine of D100,000 or two years’ imprisonment

The sentences are set to run consecutively, meaning Simaga faces a total of four years in prison if he is unable to pay the fines. Additionally, the court ordered the forfeiture of the two pistols—designated as Exhibits A and B—to the state, following the prosecution's request in accordance with Section 25(3) of the Arms and Ammunition Act. The Gambia Police Force praised the successful resolution of the case, reaffirming its commitment to pursuing fugitives, upholding justice, and safeguarding national security.

Reflecting on Yahya Jammeh's Complicated Legacy

By alhagie Suntou Touray

Truth, Compassion, and the Path to National Healing: Reflecting on Yahya Jammeh's Complicated Legacy Yahya Jammeh’s legacy is far from one-dimensional, a fact that demands careful consideration. While many Gambians benefited from his policies—including scholarships, financial assistance, and initiatives like the Presidential Award for Young Entrepreneurs and Professionals (PaJEP)—it is equally important to confront the darker aspects of his rule. As a former president, Jammeh was, like all humans, capable of making mistakes. However, the mistakes made during his presidency were not trivial. They were profound and, regrettably, resulted in the loss of lives, freedom, and dignity for numerous Gambians. For those who still support and admire Jammeh, the most honorable response is not to perpetuate blind loyalty but to acknowledge his missteps with sincerity. The teachings of the Noble Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) remind us that when significant wrongs are committed, the righteous path is one of Tawba—repentance. This process involves seeking forgiveness both from God and from those who have been harmed, marking the beginning of emotional accountability and representing an act of strength rather than weakness. What is particularly alarming is the reluctance among some to acknowledge the consequences of Jammeh’s actions, opting instead to defend the indefensible. This stance reflects a troubling lack of compassion and diminishes the suffering experienced by countless victims and their families. The Gambian people are inherently forgiving, and for some, supporting Jammeh may offer personal solace. However, it must never come at the expense of truth. Such support should not diminish the pain endured by others or invalidate the experiences of those who suffered under his regime.

Speaking from personal experience, in December 2007, I was detained at the Navy Headquarters. I was fortunate to be released unharmed, thanks to the intervention of a naval officer on duty. Had he not been present, I could easily have become another name among the many Gambians who faced brutal torture or disappearance. That moment, rather than leaving me bitter, serves as a testament to the precariousness of survival for so many. It is crucial to recognize that, while Jammeh’s administration had its benefits—like facilitating access to civil service jobs for previously marginalized groups and sponsoring spiritual pilgrimages for many supporters—these contributions do not erase the serious human rights violations that also marked his time in power. It is only human to feel gratitude for the positive aspects of his governance. Yet, it is equally essential to express empathy for those who bear the scars of his regime. We must create space for dual truths: that some Gambians thrived under Jammeh's leadership while others suffered irreparably. A healthy society is one that can hold these truths together, allowing for a rich and nuanced understanding of our past.

I think of my late friend, Ebrima Solo Sandeng—may Allah grant him eternal peace. He epitomized principles of compassion and humanity, and to his family, as well as to the families of all victims of past injustices, I extend my deepest prayers: may Allah grant them Jannah and peace. The journey toward national healing begins with acknowledgment. It is only through confronting our past with honesty and compassion that we can work toward reconciliation, justice, and unity.

Government Stops Over 1,424 Absentee Workers’ Salaries, Recommends Summary Dismissal

According to the press release issued by the office of spokesperson president Ebrima G Sankareh over one thousand unaccounted workers will be summarily dismiss. Bellow is the full text of the press release. The Gambia Government Stops Over 1,424 Absentee Workers’ Salaries, Recommends Summary Dismissal Per PSC Regulations No. 57 Banjul, The Gambia - The Gambia Government announces that The Ministry of Public Service, Administrative Reform, Policy Coordination & Delivery through the Personnel Management Office (PMO), successfully carried out two phases of Staff Audit in the Fiscal Year 2024. Phase One covered the Ministries of Basic and Secondary Education, Health and Agriculture, Livestock & Food Security. The finalised report of this Staff Audit has resulted in the stoppage of over 1,424 unaccountable public servants’ salaries. Accordingly, banks and relevant financial institutions where their salaries were deposited, have been duly notified to recover all wrongful salaries paid to these absentee Government employees. While the recovery process progresses, a list of the said perennially absentee staff has been submitted to the Public Service Commission (PSC) with recommendations to summarily dismiss them, and declare their positions vacant in accordance with PSC Regulations No.57. The Second Phase of the Staff Audit conducted in December 2024, covered the rest of the Civil Service, which includes the Armed and Security Forces. Crucially, based on the preliminary reports of this Audit, some 679 Public Servants could not be physically identified. Consequently, their salaries will be initially stopped for the month of April, 2025 pending potentially genuine queries from affected staff. Thereafter, a detailed list covering unseen staff will be published for wrongful salary recovery and immediate dismissal from the Service of The Gambia Government. Both phases of Staff Audit were conducted together with Pensioners’ Audit, with a view to cleaning up of Government pensioners’ database of deceased beneficiaries. Significantly, and consistent with global best practices, The Ministry of Public Service, is poised to put in place robust mechanisms and processes to circumvent persistent incidents of ghost workers on Government payroll for both active employees and pensioners. These Audit exercises are saving The Gambia Government millions of Dalasis on account of wrongful salary and pension payments. Sign: Ebrima G. Sankareh The Gambia Government Spokesperson & Presidential Diaspora Adviser

Journalism without inquiry is just storytelling without substance.

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

Investigative rigor is what separates true journalism from mere reporting—it challenges narratives, uncovers truths, and holds power accountable. Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: The absolute silence of Gambian media practitioners regarding the arrest of an editor and a political commentator is deeply concerning. This lack of coverage raises serious questions about media integrity and suggests a troubling compromise or a deliberate act of self-censorship that stops the exposure of human rights violations against certain individuals. It increasingly appears that Gambian online media platforms are mere mouthpieces for the Senegalese government, undermining their role as independent watchdogs for justice and truth. At its core, journalism serves as an essential safeguard for democracy, bravely holding those in power accountable rather than merely echoing government narratives. A free press stands as an unwavering pillar of justice, ensuring that dissenting voices are not only heard but amplified. It must resist being selective in its reporting, rejecting any role as a propaganda machine for governments or their officials. Journalists have the right to pursue the truth without fear of persecution. Dedicated and professional journalists fiercely advocate for press freedom, defend the rights of their colleagues, and expose human rights abuses. They stand firmly against any government efforts to stifle the free press or target journalists for retribution.

As responsible journalist or journalists of conscience our laws, moral standards, customs, and modern civil rights exist to uphold the five fundamental freedoms of every individual: the right to life, the right to honor, the right to property, the right to faith (belief), and the right to express one’s thought (ideas and opinions). Protecting these freedoms is not merely a legal obligation; it is the cornerstone of a free society. When these rights are suppressed, it stifles the very essence of human expression. The moment one individual is unjustly deprived of these liberties, the fabric of society is threatened. Fatoumatta: The arrest of Simon Faye from Sen TV and apolitical commentator Abdou Nguer marks a blatant assault on freedom of thought and information. Alarmingly, this critical incident has been largely ignored by Gambian online news outlets, which seem more invested in propagating the interests of the Senegalese government rather than defending the human rights of journalists and supporters of previous regimes. None of Faye’s comments incited public unrest; any chaos would rightfully fall on those who instigate it. He is a journalist of integrity, not a disruptor of civil peace or our democratic institutions. The issue at hand isn’t whether Faye authored the controversial article; rather, his wrongful arrest embodies an alarming trend of intimidation that undermines the press, aiming to instill fear among Senegalese citizens regarding their ability to voice dissent—especially if their opinions challenge Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko or jeopardize his image. The mere sensitivity of a Prime Minister does not legitimize the prosecution of a journalist or a citizen, nor can it justify keeping him in custody. This ordeal represents a grievous abuse of power that contradicts the assurances made by the President during his recent media interaction, where he attempted to distance himself from these politically motivated arrests. Fatoumatta: It is abundantly clear to all observers that Prime Minister Sonko is the architect of these repressive measures, regardless of whether or not he explicitly directed the DIC (the Directorate of Criminal Investigations) or the prosecutor to act. In oppressive regimes, officials frequently operate as ardent defenders of their leaders’ images, acting without formal orders. The President's denial merely legitimizes a troubling pattern that many hoped was only a temporary aberration. Regrettably, the intimidation and manipulation of the DIC as a political tool continue unabated, contrary to the expectations of a hopeful Senegalese populace. Let us be crystal clear: every citizen has the right to scrutinize societal issues and express their thoughts on public actions and the authorities executing them without having to justify themselves. Every Gambian and Senegalese citizen—especially journalists, intellectuals, and analysts—should relish the freedom to articulate, publish, and disseminate their reflections, analyses, and interpretations openly. They possess the autonomy to interpret, describe, and critique events through their perspectives, guided by their beliefs and emotions. This kind of critical discourse is vital for a vibrant intellectual community. Journalists must be able to voice their criticism of Ousmane Sonko, Diomaye Faye, or any public figure without fear of reprisal. They should freely evaluate and interpret actions—such as Sonko's trips or visits—through their own lenses. They have the right to interpret decrees as power grabs and question the motivations behind inaction. This kind of discourse is not just a right; it is the lifeblood of civic engagement and accountability. Fatoumatta: New leaders must recognize that with their offices comes a responsibility to accept scrutiny. They are not above public evaluation; they are, in fact, servants of the people. Instead of retreating into sensitivity, these leaders should actively engage with the pressing issues that affect the Senegalese populace. The economic hardships currently plaguing the Senegalese people are dire and demand urgent attention. Citizens are not concerned with the Prime Minister's travels; they seek resolution to the pressing challenges they face daily. If he finds public scrutiny unsettling or feels the need to clarify his actions, it is incumbent upon him to engage constructively in public discourse. This engagement embodies the fundamental principles of democracy. Each leader, including the President and Prime Minister, must prioritize the security and welfare of the Senegalese people over trivial distractions; only then can they fulfill their mandate and earn the trust of the nation. Authentic prophets and revolutionaries are, above all, liberators who actively expand and deepen the rights of their contemporaries and the societies they seek to transform. They are celebrated for breaking the chains of injustice that bind individuals. The current regime’s governance has fallen short, failing to uphold essential public freedoms. Nonetheless, we still have the opportunity to enact meaningful change. We must allow intellectual and democratic vitality to thrive, resisting any attempts to suppress it. True transformation cannot occur without a genuinely free press. A newspaper’s editorial stance reflects its core values—standing either with or against those in power is a critical choice that must be honored. Fatoumatta: In this light, Gambian media practitioners should unite in solidarity with journalists across the globe. They must reject the role of propagandists or public relations agents for any government and instead commit to responsible and ethical journalism that upholds the integrity of the profession.

Editorial: The Supreme Court: A Pillar of Justice, Not a Tool for Convenience.

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

Fatoumatta: The Supreme Court stands as the guardian of justice in The Gambia, serving all Gambians, regardless of political affiliation. Its rulings shape the legal landscape, yet reactions to its decisions expose a troubling trend—respect and praise when a ruling is favorable, but insults and disdain when the outcome is undesirable. Recent verdicts illustrate this inconsistency. When the court ruled in favor of the Kanifing Municipal Authority (KMC) against the Ministry of Lands and the Inspector General of Police (IGP), it was widely hailed as an independent and impartial institution. Social media buzzed with commendations. However, this admiration often turns to disdain when the court's decisions do not align with certain political interests. Critics resort to insults and disparaging remarks, questioning the integrity of the judges and the Chief Justice. This pattern was evident when the court ruled in favor of the UDP in the case of National Assembly member Yah Kumba Jaiteh's removal—praise flowed freely. Yet, unfavorable rulings, such as the dismissal of recent election petition cases, have sparked contempt and derision. Such selective respect undermines the very foundation of justice. The courts are not instruments to serve political agendas; they are guardians of the law, tasked with upholding fairness and equity. It is imperative for all Gambians, regardless of political affiliation, to understand that justice is not about winning or losing—it is about the rule of law. Justice is not about political convenience. It is about upholding the rule of law, even when decisions are difficult or unpopular. The courts exist for every Gambian, and every verdict must be respected—not selectively embraced or condemned based on preference. Democratic principles demand faith in the judiciary, and that faith must not waver with partisan interests. The judiciary’s role is sacrosanct. Those who believe in justice must defend it in both triumph and disappointment. Gambians must rise above political biases and recognize that a fair legal system depends on respect for its institutions. Insulting judges or discrediting the courts undermines democracy itself. Fatoumatta: Let this be a reminder: the Supreme Court is not a battleground for political interests—it is the bedrock of justice, and it deserves unwavering respect.