BREAKING: "Ontario Premier Doug Ford brings the hammer down on Donald Trump and Elon Musk

"Ontario Premier Doug Ford brings the hammer down on Donald Trump and Elon Musk over the disastrous MAGA tariffs — announces cancellation of a lucrative Starlink deal and bans all American companies from government contracts. And he was just getting warmed up... "Starting today, all U.S.-based companies will be banned from taking part in government procurement. Every year the province and its agencies spend about $30 billion on procurement alongside our more than $200 billion plan to build infrastructure," said Ford. "U.S. based businesses will now lose out on tens of billions of dollars in revenues. They only have President Trump to blame," he stated bluntly. "I'm also urging all four hundred and forty-four municipalities to do the same and I'm thrilled to see some are already stepping up." he continued. "For example, Mayor Patrick Brown and the city of Brampton and many other cities." "As part of this government-wide procurement ban we're going one step closer. We're ripping up Ontario's contract with Starlink. It’s done, it’s gone," he said of the $100 million deal. "We won’t award contracts to people who enable and encourage economic attacks on our province and our country," Ford added. "Alongside federal tariffs and the measures my fellow premiers are being forward, this is Team Canada's opening response," he said. Ford has also threatened to cut off electricity to the United States and slap a 25% surcharge on the energy exports to New York, Michigan, and Minnesota. Meanwhile, the U.S. stock market is in free fall and prices are already skyrocketing. If Trump doesn't reverse course immediately we are going to hurtle head first into a full-blown recession."

Court Freed Woman After 11 Years in Jail

By Kexx News The Court of Appeal has overturned the murder conviction and death sentence of Mariama Conteh, who was found guilty of killing her partner, Tijan Bah, in 2014 by Justice E.O. Dada J. In a landmark ruling on 25 February 2025, the Court of Appeal declared the trial a "nullity" due to significant procedural errors. Mariama Conteh had been accused of fatally stabbing Tijan Bah following a violent dispute over money for their daughter’s medical treatment. Evidence on record indicated that she was in a relationship with Tijan, and they shared a child. The altercation occurred at Tijan's home in Bakau. To support their case, the Prosecution had called eight (8) witnesses, including Tijan's mother, who was an eyewitness. Mariama Conteh testified as the sole witness in her defence. According to the evidence, on October 1st 2014, Mariama Conteh went to Tijan's compound to ask him for money to buy medication for their daughter, who was ill. An argument ensued, with Tijan refusing to provide the funds, which escalated into a fight. During the fight, Tigan was stabbed, leading to his death, for which she was charged, tried and convicted.

Mariama appealed her conviction and sentence on the following grounds: 1. The trial judge misdirected himself by assuming jurisdiction to try her before the Superior Court (Trial High Court). It was argued that the testimony of the expert medical doctor (a dentist) was inconsistent with the age determination report and that the inconsistencies in the doctor's testimony were not resolved in her favour, and the Appellant (Mariama) was a minor at the time of the incident. 2. The trial judge misdirected himself by concluding that Mariama murdered Tijan. The grounds of misdirection claim that the judge relied heavily on Exhibit A (the second cautionary statement from Mariama), which was deemed inadmissible as evidence. 3. The trial judge misdirected himself by not properly evaluating the testimonies of the witnesses, leading to an incorrect conclusion. It was contended that there were doubts within the prosecution's evidence that were never resolved in favour of Mariama. 4. The judge misdirected himself in law by holding that the prosecution had proven the charge of murder against the Appellant (Mariama) beyond a reasonable doubt. It was argued that the prosecution failed to establish all the necessary elements of murder, rendering the trial court's decision perverse, erroneous, and unreasonable, which resulted in a miscarriage of justice. The reliefs sought from the Court of Appeal included the following: A declaration that Mariama was a minor at the time of the incident. A ruling that the trial judge did not have jurisdiction to try her. An order to overturn and set aside Mariama's conviction and sentence. An order to acquit and discharge her on the charge of murder. Alternatively, an order to release her from prison custody immediately, rather than remitting the case for retrial in the children's court, considering that she has already spent 10 years in custody. However, the case was delayed for several years due to the prosecution's failure to file the required legal documents on time, stemming from delays in preparing the Records of Proceedings from the trial court. On October 21, 2014, the Court ordered both parties to file their briefs of argument. The appellant submitted their brief on November 5, 2014, but the State did not file theirs. Principal State Counsel A. A. Wakawa informed the Court on December 16, 2014, when the case was scheduled for argument, that the Ministry of Justice was bereaved due to the loss of one of their lawyers, which prevented them from filing their brief. The panel noted that since the State failed to submit a brief of argument, the Court was not required to hear them in oral arguments. "The law states that where the Respondent fails to file their arguments, this is tantamount to an admission of everything in the Appellant's brief. They will be bound by the outcome of the appeal." The Court clarified that the State's failure to file its brief did not provide an unfair advantage to the Appellant, and the appeal would succeed or fail based on the strength of the Appellant's arguments alone. A crucial issue in the case was Conteh's age at the time of the incident. The Court ruled that she was approximately 17 years old when the crime occurred, meaning the trial had been conducted in a court that lacked jurisdiction. As a result, the proceedings were deemed void, and the conviction and death sentence were overturned. The Appeal Court held that the trial of the Appellant, Mariama, was a nullity for various reasons. First, the indictment of the Appellant before the High Court was itself a nullity. Second, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to try the Appellant, who was a minor at the time of the alleged offence. Third, the trial judge's error in not investigating the true age of the Appellant rendered the proceedings invalid.

Court Declared Kumba Sinyan Detention In Main Prison Yard Unlawful

Courtesy of Kexx News Justice Jaiteh of the High Court of Banjul has ruled in favour of Kumba Sinyan, declaring her detention in the convict wing of Mile 2 unlawful and a violation of her constitutional rights. Kumba Sinyan, through her lawyer Sagarr C.T. Twum, filed a motion on December 5, 2024, seeking a declaration that her imprisonment in the convict section of the Female Wing of the Mile Two Central Prisons was unconstitutional and any other orders the Court may deem fitting. The Motion stated that the transfer violated Section 36(2)(a) of the Prisons Act, which mandates the separation of remand prisoners from convicted criminals. The motion was supported by an affidavit consisting of five paragraphs, along with a series of exhibits marked as "ACJ 1 to 7." The State opposed the motion, filing an opposing affidavit containing 21 paragraphs on December 6, 2024, along with one document marked as "R1" on January 19, 2025. Kumba Sinyan's counsel provided a reply affidavit comprising 19 paragraphs. The State then filed an opposing affidavit of eight paragraphs, along with three documents marked as K1, K2, and K3, respectively.

In the oral arguments, Counsel Sagarr challenged her client's imprisonment in the convict section of Mile 2 Central Prison, arguing that Kumba Sinyan, as a remand prisoner, should be housed separately from convicted prisoners. She contended that the proper legal procedures were not followed during the change of Kumba's status and asserted that prison authorities do not have the authority to change the status of a remand prisoner as a convicted individual without a court order. State Counsel M. Sanyang responded, arguing that the transfer was necessary to alleviate overcrowding in the remand section and that appropriate procedures were followed, citing sections of the Prison Act and the Constitution. She also pointed out that Kumba Sinyan had been involved in altercations and violations of prison rules. Counsel Sagarr further argued that the process of charging Kumba within the prison system was flawed, as she was not given a proper hearing or allowed to defend herself before the transfer. State Counsel contended that Kumba was not moved to the convict section but rather to a separate area created specifically to decongest the remand wing. She added that prison authorities acted within their legal powers under Section 17(2) of the Constitution, which permits certain restrictions on individual rights in the public interest. Counsel M. Sanyang also asserted that Kumba violated prison rules under Section 62 of the Prisons Act by engaging in altercations with other inmates, which constituted a security risk and justified the decision to relocate her. She further claimed that Kumba Sinyan was lawfully charged within the prison system for violating prison rules and that the transfer was part of managing her behaviour rather than a form of punishment. M. Sanyang insisted that the movement was administrative and necessary for maintaining order within the prison. Counsel Sagarr challenged the authenticity of the prison records, particularly Exhibit R1, which documented the charges and transfer decision. She argued that the document contained alterations that sought to show that Kumba was not in the convict section. Moreover, she highlighted inconsistencies in the records, such as missing signatures and alterations, she claimed that the document was manipulated to justify the transfer. Justice Jaiteh, in his decision, stated he had carefully reviewed the motion papers, supporting affidavits, and attachments with great interest. He posed the question: "Was the applicant, a remand prisoner who had not yet been convicted, unlawfully placed in the convict section of the prison?" Justice Jaiteh explained that the legal framework governing the Criminal Procedure Code and the Prisons Act, both of which mandate a clear separation between remanded and convicted prisoners. He emphasized that the court needed to determine whether Kumba's constitutional rights were violated due to her transfer and whether the prison authorities acted within their legal powers. He added that the case raised broader concerns about the treatment of detainees and the extent of discretion prison administrators have over the housing of prisoners. Justice Jaiteh highlighted that Kumba Sinyan had been charged with murder, a non-bailable offence under the law. Initially, she was held in the remand section of the prison while awaiting trial but was later transferred to the convict section, allegedly as a form of punishment or due to overcrowding in the remand section. He pointed out that the transfer, according to Kumba Sinyan, violated Section 36(2)(a) of the Prisons Act, which mandates the separation of remand prisoners from convicted criminals. The action also breached her constitutional rights, including her right to liberty and a fair hearing as provided for in Sections 19 and 24(3) of the 1997 Constitution and International legal instruments also support the rights. Justice Jaiteh said he reviewed Exhibit R1 and concluded that its discrepancies raise serious questions about record-keeping within the prison system and the potential abuse of authority. He noted that the prison authorities at Mile 2 Central Prison displayed a blatant disregard for due process and fundamental human rights. Justice Jaiteh indicated that Kumba was not given a fair hearing before any disciplinary actions were taken, violating her right to procedural fairness. He said the inconsistencies in the official records highlighted a deliberate attempt to cover up administrative failures and justify unlawful actions.

He emphasized that imprisoning Kumba Sinyan in the convict section as a remand prisoner violated her constitutional rights to the presumption of innocence and fair hearing under section 24(3) of the Constitution and also contradicted the principle of separating remand prisoners from convicted criminals, as stated in the 1997 Constitution. Justice Jaiteh condemned the actions of the prison authorities and highlighted the systemic failures in their processes. He deemed that the application had merit, which should set a precedent to prevent future arbitrary decisions, ensuring the protection of detainees’ rights. He ruled that Kumba's imprisonment in the convict section was unlawful. Justice Jaiteh recommended that the Gambia Prison Service align its disciplinary procedures with international best practices, specifically the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). Additionally, prison officials should receive training on human rights standards and record-keeping, with independent oversight bodies established to monitor prison administration and investigate allegations of abuse. Justice Jaiteh ordered that the ruling be served to the Attorney General, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Interior, the Inspector General of Police, and the Director General of Prisons for consideration to prevent future violations. Copyright © 2025 Kexx News. Follow Everyone Comment Fans @highlight #courtreporting #thenationeye #factualnews

Bench Warrant Issued For Sanna Manjang's Arrest

Courtesy of kexx Sanneh The Banjul Magistrate Court presided over by Principal Magistrate Krubally, has issued a bench warrant for the arrest of Sanna Manjang. The development occurred after the police submitted an application to the court requesting a bench warrant. Assistant Superintendent E. Sarr made the application, seeking the issuance of a warrant to arrest Sanna Manjang so he could be brought before the court for trial. Superintendent Sarr cited that the police had received correspondence from Interpol Washington, United States National Central Bureau, dated February 25, 2025. The correspondence requested the Gambia Police Force provide a copy of the arrest warrant for the fugitive known as Sanna Manjang, along with the related case reference number.

Magistrate Krubally granted the application and issued the bench warrant for Sanna Manjang's arrest, requiring him to appear before the court to respond to the alleged charges. The Washington, United States National Central Bureau wrote to the Gambia authority asking whether Sanna is still wanted by the country and, If so, to provide a copy of the arrest warrant. "Dear colleagues, is Sanna MANIANG still wanted by your country? If so, please provide a copy of the arrest warrant," Washington, United States National Central Bureau wrote.

Sanna Manjang was a member of the Gambia Armed Forces and also allegedly a member of an assassin team in the Gambia called "Junglers". He is alleged to be one of the brutal killers solely responsible for the disappearance, murder, torture, and rape of individuals during the regime of former President Yahya Jammeh (1994-2016). He is believed to be one of the longest-serving members of the alleged Junglers group, who actively participated in most of the atrocities that occurred in the Country. Follow Everyone Top Comment @highlight #courtreporting #thenationeye #factualnews

The Masenbeh Ward By-Election – A Turning Point for the National People's Party (NPP)

The recent by-election in the Masenbeh ward of the Kiang region serves as a vivid reminder of the unpredictable and often tumultuous nature of our political landscape. The United Democratic Party (UDP) has once again asserted its dominance in this constituency, reclaiming a seat that was vacated due to the unfortunate passing of their sitting councilor. While the UDP's victory reflects its entrenched support within the region, it also presents a critical moment of reflection and strategy for the ruling National People's Party (NPP).

Despite our loss, it is essential to acknowledge the progress we made during this electoral battle. Our candidate secured a greater number of votes than in the previous election, signaling a growing acceptance of the NPP's message and vision among the electorate. This incremental increase is not to be underestimated; it indicates that the citizens of Kiang are beginning to see the promise in the NPP's policies and initiatives. It is a testament to the tireless work and dedication of our party members who have passionately engaged with the community, listened to their concerns, and advocated for their needs.

We must respect the choice of the electorate in Masenbeh ward. Democracy thrives on the voice of the people, and the NPP acknowledges that the voters have spoken. It is our duty to not only accept the outcome but to learn from it. The most effective political parties are those that can adapt and evolve based on the feedback from their constituents. The NPP is determined to analyze the factors that contributed to this result, understand the aspirations of the people, and recalibrate our strategies accordingly. In the coming years leading to the next general election in 2026, the NPP will focus its efforts on bridging the gap between our party's vision and the expectations of the people of Kiang. Our commitment to building a stronger, more inclusive Lower River Region remains steadfast. We recognize that winning the hearts and minds of the electorate takes time, effort, and, most importantly, a sincere dedication to serving their needs. As the coordinator for the Lower River Region diaspora, I can assure you all the the NPP LRR Diaspora is more committed than ever to galvanizing support for the NPP in our region. We believe there is a tremendous opportunity for us to showcase our achievements and articulate our plans in a way that resonates with the diverse communities within the region. We must underscore the positive impacts of our governance while being open and transparent about the challenges that lie ahead. While the UDP may currently hold the reins in Masenbeh, we must remain optimistic about the potential for change. The dynamics of political allegiance can shift, and it is essential for the NPP to remain proactive in its engagements. We intend to mobilize our grassroots support and foster a sense of belonging among all constituents, inviting them to share in our vision for a brighter future. In conclusion, the Masenbeh ward by-election should serve not as a setback for the NPP but as a stepping stone towards greater realization of our goals. We are steadfast in our commitment to transforming the Lower River Region and moving these communities beyond their historical ties to the opposition. Under the leadership of our esteemed President Adama Barrow we will rise to the challenge, learning from this electoral experience, and emerge stronger as we strive to turn the tide in favor of the grey party, the NPP, by 2026. It is not just a political journey; it is a commitment to the people we serve. Let us forge ahead with determination and purpose. Yaya Dampha NPP Diaspora coordinator for LRR

Gambian journalists Must Transition Conjecture journalism" to "interpretative journalism."

Fatoumatta: I have frequently voiced my concern that journalism in The Gambia has reached a troubling low in terms of professionalism and the quality of content offered to its readers and audience. It is my sincere hope that Gambian journalists will transition from the practice of "conjecture journalism" to embrace "interpretative journalism." This leads me to question whether cartoonists actively participate in our newsrooms or if cartoon creation is integrated into the curriculum of Gambian journalism schools. The inclusion of editorial cartoons is not merely beneficial but essential for enriching the journalistic content we provide. For media outlets needing in-house cartoonists, hiring a dedicated artist is highly advisable. At The Independent, we had the privilege of working with notable talents like the late Pa Dacosta, Njogu Touray, Momodou Camara, Kolley, and Ghanaian artist Mr. Kofi, who contributed impactful editorial pieces on pressing issues. Today, many journalists grapple with the fundamental principles of their craft. This is the crux of my argument: individuals lacking robust journalistic training are in positions to teach it. Journalism is not just a job; it is a revered profession that demands the same rigor and training as any other field. Unfortunately, some people have stumbled into journalism out of desperation or chance, while others believe that a knack for writing fiction or essays equates to journalistic excellence. In stark contrast, I chose to pursue journalism purposefully, seeking the comprehensive training essential for this role. It is crucial to emphasize that professional training must extend to journalists and media owners alike.

To elevate journalism above mediocrity, we must embrace a broader range of elements and techniques. Merely being adept at writing fiction or essays does not guarantee journalistic quality. While not every newspaper needs to include cartoons to be considered legitimate, editorial cartoons are a vital component for many respected publications. They deliver visual and often satirical insights into current affairs, political climates, and societal issues. Cartoons have the unique ability to distill complex subjects into easily digestible content, shaping public opinion and sparking essential discussions. While some newspapers may choose to forgo them, those that include cartoons often discover that they significantly enhance readers' comprehension of the news, offering perspectives that straightforward text may fail to convey. In the diverse realm of journalism, editorial cartoons occupy a distinguished and irreplaceable niche. With an impactful mix of humor, satire, and visual storytelling, they reveal the hidden dimensions of society, prompting us to confront uncomfortable truths and strive for improvement. Editorial cartoons are cherished in journalism for numerous reasons: they present powerful visual commentaries that transcend linguistic barriers and encapsulate intricate ideas. They effectively mirror pressing societal challenges while using humor to provoke thought and challenge established norms. The tradition of editorial cartooning boasts a remarkable history, with trailblazers like James Gillray and Thomas Nast employing their art to critique political and social issues. Cartoons stand as emblems of free expression, empowering cartoonists to elevate underrepresented voices and confront those in authority. They play an educational role by presenting political matters and events in a way that is accessible and engaging, provoking reflection among readers. As instruments of public scrutiny, cartoons boldly address corruption, inequality, and injustice through visual commentary. Their power lies in the ability to shape public sentiment, question authority, and distill complex issues into relatable imagery that resonates across diverse audiences. Ultimately, cartoons and their creators enrich journalistic discourse by offering a unique, engaging, and often poignant lens through which we can understand news and social events.

Man Jailed For Exposing A Lady's Nude

A resident of the Upper River Region has been sentenced to ten years in prison for sharing intimate images of a woman in an online forum, marking a significant legal stance on the misuse of social media in the context of freedom of speech The individual, a Malian national, faced two counts: stealing a mobile phone and committing acts of online sexual abuse. In December of the previous year, he unlawfully acquired a Samsung mobile phone valued at D9,500, which belonged to a certain lady from Upper River Region. After obtaining the phone, he accessed the private photo files and subsequently shared intimate images of the woman without her consent, including forwarding these images to her husband residing in Europe. The prosecution illustrated that this act was motivated by a desire to "humiliate and cause distress" to the victim. In a ruling delivered by Magistrate Peter Che of the Basse court, the defendant was found guilty on both charges. He was sentenced to three years for the theft and seven years for the online sexual abuse, with both sentences to be served consecutively.

The implications of this landmark judgment extend beyond the individual case, highlighting the urgent need for accountability in the digital age, particularly within the Gambian context where the frameworks of freedom of speech and newfound democracy are frequently misinterpreted. This ruling sets a vital precedent that indicates the legal system's intolerance for the misuse of social media as a tool for harassment and exploitation. As society grapples with the responsibilities that come with these freedoms, it becomes increasingly important for individuals to recognize the line between expression and abuse. The judgment underscores a crucial call for individuals who have suffered similar violations to consider legal action against those who exploit or disseminate personal images without consent. In conclusion, this case serves as a potent reminder of the necessity for responsible usage of social media, alongside the essential support for victims. Society must rally together to ensure that such abuses are addressed decisively, safeguarding the dignity and privacy of all individuals in the digital landscape

Essa Bokar Sey’s Lies Exposed

By Alagie Yorro Jallow The final tell-all interview featuring Essa Bokar Sey, conducted by journalist Ebrima Baldeh, brought to light several critical issues. Unfortunately, the interview came across as more of a public relations exercise focused on personal branding, laden with half-truths. We challenge Essa Sey to leverage the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) to substantiate his claims. Former Ambassador Essa Sey must recognize that 75% of his supporters among the Gambian people are far from naive; they possess the critical thinking skills necessary to analyze information rigorously. Gambian journalists must guard against manipulation and refrain from disseminating information without thorough evaluation. It is crucial to engage in logical analysis rather than merely echoing concepts and theories without scrutiny. The Gambia unequivocally provides for both a Freedom of Information Act and an Access to Information Act, granting every citizen the right to access official information. Essa Sey asserts that he wrote a letter to Yahya Jammeh in May 2003, urging him to adhere to a term limit; however, he was recalled from his position just a month later. It is vital to highlight that the 1997 constitution does not stipulate term limits. This incongruity raises pressing questions about why Essa Sey would claim to have advised Jammeh on a matter that was non-existent.

Fatoumatta: Consider the Latin maxim, "onus probandi actori incumbit," meaning "the burden of proof lies on the one who asserts." In other words, "he who alleges must prove." If Essa Sey indeed penned a letter to Yahya Jammeh on May 2, 2003, the question remains: why has he not produced a copy of this letter? Regardless, he still has the right to utilize the Freedom of Information Act to formally request a copy of the supposed correspondence he claims to have sent regarding the term limit. This transparency is not only warranted; it is essential for accountability in our democratic discourse.

"No, I Will not Inherit Anyone's Enemy"

By Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: In a world where divisive politics and hatred threaten to tear societies apart, it is crucial to stand firm against the forces that seek to sow discord. The Gambia, a nation rich in cultural diversity and heritage, faces challenges that could undermine its unity and progress. This article addresses the toxic elements that jeopardize our nation's future and emphasizes the importance of rejecting inherited enmities and embracing a spirit of cooperation and understanding. As Martin Luther King, Jr. said, "Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." This powerful message from his 1957 speech in Montgomery, Alabama, serves as a reminder that love and understanding are the only antidotes to hatred and division Fatoumatta: No, I will not inherit anyone's enemy. If Gambia were to perish, which we do not wish for, it would be due to hatred, hypocrisy, tribalism, toxic divisive politics of populism and identity politics, “Hasidiya” and “Sohorr,” and alternative truths—destroyed by spiteful hearts and deceitful speech. People who despise others without reason and seek to enlist you in their campaign of hate. But they should know this: I will never take on someone else's enemy. Never! These individuals, consumed by bitterness and hostility, trapped in resentment and wrongdoing, are found everywhere: places of worship, homes, workplaces, in the media (especially social media), on talk shows, call-in programs, and in academia. They detest their country, its leaders, and all that is good; they likely even despise themselves. Recently, I discussed on this platform how Gambians have conflated bias, discrimination, contempt, prejudice, and hate without sympathy when addressing issues of ethnic-tribal chauvinism and Islamist populism. I stand by every word in that article, with no apologies. The incident caused quite a stir and was quite revealing. Some individuals we regard as 'men of God' are just ordinary men, prone to the same weaknesses as anyone else. However, God's standard remains steadfast, bearing this seal: God knows those who are truly His. And there are those men of God who disguise themselves as democrats and patriots. What then am I addressing? The haters, the manipulators, and tribal bigots who desire for you to adopt their hatred. Those filled with antipathy and hostility towards others, seeking to enlist you into their ranks. And when you resist, the accusations multiply: you've sold your soul to the Devil, your god is your appetite (and mine is indeed substantial!). Your cravings have blinded you to reason. And so forth. What is my response to all this? I refuse to take on your adversaries. I echo a famous musician's words I can’t remember her name: “I can't kill myself I can't kill myself Allow me to enjoy life In this life, I can't kill myself Fatoumatta, I can't kill myself”. Indeed, if I start to hate anyone at this stage in my life, it's akin to self-destruction. I would be ingesting poison. Hatred is toxic, and consuming it won't harm your neighbor, only yourself. Occasionally, a politician who masquerades as a self-proclaimed activist and a tribal bigot who supports the opposition and other politicians, who supports the opposition and hates other people's political choices and shares political affiliations and tribal heritage, attempted to contact and engage me in tribal toxic politics. Failing to reach me, he reached out to my friend, a close friend from my province and also a member of the former pro-democracy activism leadership during the struggle for resistance to authoritarianism and struggle for democracy and free press. What was the message, relayed to me later by my friend? "All you Fulas are backing the Adama Barrow government..." Truly? A Fula-led government. Such a hateful sentiment! A malevolent mind. Because President Barrow is of mixed heritage, a Mandinka father and a Fula mother, and two of his wives are Fula and his uncles Sarahules and grown-up in Banjul in a Wolof community, the president represents the Gambia national identity, they claim the government is Fula-dominated. Is it wrong for a man to be true to his ethnicity? The initial cabinet formed by President Barrow in 2017 was a representation of Gambia's national character, with the Mandinka being the majority among the ethnic groups.

Fatoumatta: I have always maintained that God has distributed all ethnicities and religions in nearly equal proportions across the country, and no single ethnicity or faith can negate the existence of another. We must coexist and work together to improve our nation. During my over thirty years of diligent observation of Gambian politics under President Barrow’s rule in eight years, I have never detected any signs of ethnic or religious prejudice. Mandinka is the dominant tribe and no government cannot be formed with a fair representation of the Mandinka ethic. This has been the norm for decades until despot Yahya Jammeh personalized power and exploited ethnic politics for his political survival. Nevertheless, the government has always embodied the Gambian spirit, obliging the President to serve all Gambians, regardless of ethnicity or faith. Therefore, I must bear the brunt of those who misunderstand. I cannot sacrifice my well-being. Allow me some indulgence. It has reached a point where my words are twisted by detractors. They misrepresent them, add a negative spin. When I say 'A', they claim I said 'B, C, and D'. Their goal? To incite animosity and scorn against me. I simply laugh and dismiss their pettiness. They fail to realize that on the Day of Judgment, every thoughtless utterance, including malicious online tirades, will be accounted for. That Day of Reckoning is inevitable... For those who expect me to adopt their animosity towards President Barrow due to his ethnic or religious background, I have news. He was, is, and will continue to be my President. My support for his administration during his first and second terms is not the reason. Although I could have accepted a prestigious position, I choose not to, despite the honor in serving one's country. But President Barrow will always be my President, any day. Thus, attempts to enlist me among his adversaries are in vain. No, I refuse to take on anyone's enmity.

I extend my gratitude to all individuals of goodwill who have made a positive impact on the world. I hold no ill will towards anyone and stand firmly by my words and actions. If we are not vigilant, hatred could be the downfall of the Gambia, and the involvement of religious and political leaders in such negativity is alarming. Relying on resentment is futile. Unfortunately, Gambia's political leadership is displaying such resentment towards a man whose only intention is to serve and dedicate himself to the nation. While the Gambia has yet to make significant strides in security, economic recovery, and anti-corruption efforts, there is hope that he will be inspired to address these pressing social issues. I affirm my choice and my right to my chosen path. As Martin Luther King Jr. also wisely noted, "Hatred paralyzes life; love releases it. Hatred confuses life; love harmonizes it." This sentiment resonates deeply as we confront the toxic elements that threaten our nation's unity. As Shakespeare said, if you hate me, I will always be on your mind; if you love me, I will forever be in your heart. Fatoumatta: In conclusion, the path to a prosperous and united Gambia lies in rejecting hatred and embracing a spirit of unity and cooperation. By refusing to inherit enmities and standing firm against divisive forces, we can build a nation that thrives on mutual respect and understanding. Let us work together to create a brighter future for all Gambians, where every individual is valued and every voice is heard. As William Shakespeare aptly put it, "Love me or hate me, both are in my favor." This quote underscores the idea that whether we are loved or hated, we remain in the thoughts of others. It is a reminder that our actions and choices will always leave an impact, and it is up to us to choose love and unity over hatred and division.

Ebrima Baldeh: A Talented Journalist Who Missed an Opportunity for Critical Inquiry

By Alagi Yorro Jallow As a journalism lecturer and former journalist, I feel it is essential to highlight that Ebrima Baldeh deserves far greater recognition for his outstanding interview with Gambians in the public sphere, especially considering the challenges he faced. That said, I was disappointed with his recent interview featuring former Gendarmerie Sergeant and Yahya Jammeh-appointed ambassador, Essa Boker Sey. Unfortunately, it came across more as a public relations strategy than a rigorous journalistic examination. Baldeh needed to investigate Sey's past as an enabler of Jammeh and understand why he has shifted to a role as a critic advocating for term limits, especially considering that his former boss systematically dismantled the 1997 constitution to eliminate such limits. This situation raises an important question: Why did Sey remain silent about constitutionalism during his time as ambassador and protest against Yahya Jammeh, or resign his job to protest against removing the term limit clause in the constitution, only to begin advocating for term limits now that he is no longer in office and with elections approaching next year? Where is consistency and principle?

Regrettably, the interview felt like a superficial PR exercise aimed at polishing former Ambassador Sey's image, focusing primarily on his role at the OIC secretariat rather than scrutinizing his complicity with dictatorship. I expected Baldeh to conduct thorough research on his guest's past actions during Yahya Jammeh's oppressive regime. Sey's statements and postings on the Gambia L listserv before the advent of Facebook were not only controversial but actively supported a dictator. Baldeh had a responsibility to delve deeper into Sey’s history as an enabler of Jammeh. Ebrima Baldeh is undoubtedly a skilled journalist and a prolific writer with significant gravitas. His previous inquiries have been pointed, direct, and genuinely in the public interest. Colleagues like Alieu Ceesay and Sultan Jammeh posed follow-up questions that were incisive, probing, and impactful. Their delivery exhibited professionalism and authority, projecting confidence, knowledge, and preparation. While their exceptional interviewing skills allowed them to navigate away from pre-submitted questions seamlessly, I couldn’t help but feel disappointed that Baldeh failed to fully expose the evident weaknesses in Sey’s mental and intellectual faculties, which Sey has worked diligently to conceal. Fatoumatta: Ebrima Baldeh’s interview should serve as a blueprint for engaging with carefully curated and reclusive individuals like Essa Boker Sey. This is especially true when compared to the disgraceful public relations spectacles produced by some social media talk show hosts. However, throughout the interview, it was disheartening to witness weak, unchallenging questions that left obvious follow-up prompts neglected, resulting in a dialogue that left viewers confused and unsatisfied. Baldeh had a unique opportunity to push for accountability, and it is disappointing that it was not fully realized.

Police Arrested 2 Men And Recovered The Gun

The police responded to a suspected shooting incident in Hanover, Serrekunda, on February 19, 2025, following reports of an individual seen with a rifle on a building. A search led to the recovery of a single-barrel gun license in the bedroom

of Ebou Drammeh, 61, who was arrested for investigation. Further inquiries revealed that his nephew, Muhammadou Kebbeh, had concealed the firearm. Investigators later recovered the firearm along with 14 live rounds and one empty shell casing at the scene. Drammeh admitted to shooting Omar Badjie, also known as “Utaka,” in the thigh after an ongoing dispute. He alleged that Badjie frequently provoked him by spraying insecticide near his window while he was resting, which he claimed was harmful to his health. On the day of the incident, Drammeh stated that he had no option but to fire his single-barrel gun (Kartuss) in response.

Badjie is currently receiving treatment at Ndemban Hospital, while Drammeh has been cautioned and detained. Meanwhile, Muhammadou Kebbeh has been arrested and detained for concealing evidence after removing the firearm and remaining ammunition from the scene. The police urge the public to report any suspicious activity to the nearest police station or call 9968885.

GAF Loss 2 Senior Non-commissioned Officers

The Gambia Armed Forces loss two senior non commission officers in one day. The cold hand of death have taken wo1 Nfansu Fofana and Sergeant Salifu Barrow on 18 of February. Both soldiers served over 30 years in the army. The Chief of Defence Staff Gambia Armed Forces, Lieutenant General Mamat OA Cham, the Deputy Chief of Defence Staff, Major General Ousman Gomez, Commander Gambia National Army, Brigadier General Sait Njie, Commander Gambia Navy, Commodore Sambou Barrow, Commander Republican National Guards, Brigadier General Yaya Drammeh, General Officers’, Soldiers and Ratings of the Gambia Armed Forces regret to announce the sudden death of two of their members in the persons of W01 Fofana Nfansu and Staff Sergeant Barrow Salifu. The two gallant soldiers passed away on Tuesday, February 18, 2025. Whilst W01 Fofana Nfansu was laid to rest the same day at his family house in Yundum, Staff Sergeant Barrow Salifu will be laid to rest on Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at his family house in Kuloro. This sad news is extended to the President and Commander- in- Chief of the armed forces, His Excellency Adama Barrow and his entire Cabinet. It is also extended to the Honourable Minister of Defence and his staff at the ministry, to the families and friends of the deceased soldiers as well as loved ones both in the Gambia and abroad. Until their demise, W01 Fofana Nfansu was on posting at the Gambia Armed Forces Training School as chief cook and Staff Sergeant Barrow Salifu was on posting at The Gambia Armed Forces Supply and Transport as a driver. We pray for Allah’s infinite mercy and grant them the highest Jannah, Ameen.

Four Suspected Armed Robbers Remanded In Central Prison

The four alleged armed robbers connected with United Bureau, United Vegetable Oil Company, Access Bank, and El-Hella Company were arraigned by police prosecution before Magistrate Krubally. The accused persons are Ansumana Jarju, Abdoulie Jallow, Losseni Diabate, and Omar Secka, charged with nine (9) counts of robbery with violence, conspiracy to commit a felony, and possession of firearms without authority. Commissioner Sanneh and DCP M. Jarju represented the Inspector General of Police, while the accused persons were unrepresented.

Before the charge sheet was read, Commissioner Sanneh made an application under Section 62 of the Criminal Procedure Code and legal notice number 3 of 2019. "My worship, before the charges are read to the accused persons, we have an application under Section 62 of the CPC and legal notice number 3 of 2019 for the matter to be transferred to the special criminal court,” Commissioner Sanneh stated. Commission Sanneh further submitted that the offence the accused persons are charged with is robbery with violence, which is a capital offence, and the punishment attracts life imprisonment, which the magistrate court lacks the jurisdiction to hear the case. Relying on Section 208A of the CPC, Commissioner Sanneh requested that the accused be remanded at Mile Central Prison pending the hearing of the matter before the High Court.

In his ruling, Magistrate Krubally agreed that the court lacked the jurisdiction to proceed with the trial due to the serious nature of the charges against the four accused. He granted the application to transfer the case to the special criminal court, which has appropriate jurisdiction, under Section 62(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Additionally, Magistrate Krubally ordered the remand of all accused persons to state central prison pending hearings at the High Court under Section 208(A) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The police prosecution charged them with nine counts of criminal offences. Count one charged Ansumana Jarju with Robbery with violence contrary to section 273(2) of the Criminal Code. The prosecution alleged that on June 29, 2021, at United Bureau, Senegambia, Ansumana Jarju, armed with a cutlass, violently robbed Binta Bah and forcefully took a total of D42,200. The amount consisted of D1,200 in cash, three laptops valued at D23,000, a Samsung S9+ valued at D17,000, and a simple phone. In count two, Ansumana Jarju, Abdoulie Jallow, and Losseni Diabate were charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, contrary to Section 368 of the Criminal Code. They accused them that on December 31, 2024, at United Vegetable Oil Company, Denton Bridge, the three conspired to rob the company. Count three charges Ansumana Jarju, Abdoulie Jallow, and Losseni Diabate with robbery with violence, also contrary to Section 273(2) of the Criminal Code. The prosecution again alleges that on December 31, 2024, at United Vegetable Oil Company, Denton Bridge, the accused, armed with cutlasses, violently robbed the company staff, stealing D400,000. In count four, Ansumana Jarju, Abdoulie Jallow, Losseni Diabate, and Omar Secka were charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, contrary to Section 368 of the Criminal Code. The allegation states that on January 22, 2025, at Access Bank, Brusubi, the four conspired to rob the bank. Count five charges Ansumana Jarju, Abdoulie Jallow, Losseni Diabate, and Omar Secka with robbery with violence, contrary to Section 273(2) of the Criminal Code. The prosecution alleges that on January 22, 2025, at Access Bank, Brusubi, they violently robbed the Access Bank staff of D1,500,000 while armed with pistols. In count six, Ansumana Jarju, Abdoulie Jallow, Losseni Diabate, and Omar Secka were charged with possession of firearms without authority, contrary to Section 8 of the Arms and Ammunition Act. The prosecution states that on January 22, 2025, at Access Bank, Brusubi, they possessed two unknown pistols along with thirteen (13) rounds of ammunition without a license from the Inspector General of Police. Count seven charges Abdoulie Jallow and Losseni Diabate with conspiracy to commit a felony, contrary to Section 368 of the Criminal Code. The prosecution alleges that on February 8, 2025, at the EL-HELLA Shop in Banjul, Abdoulie Jallow and Losseni Diabate conspired to commit a felony by planning to rob the shop. Count Eight charges Abdoulie Jallow and Losseni Diabate for robbery with violence, contrary to Section 273(2) of the Criminal Code. The prosecution alleged that on February 8, 2025, at EL-HELLA Shop in Banjul, while armed with pistols, the two violently robbed Muhammed Seedy Hydara and Ebrima Hydara of one million, two hundred and forty-five thousand Dalasis (D1,245,000) and 1,650 property belonging to Muhammed Seedy Hydara. In the final count, Abdoulie Jallow and Losseni Diabate are again charged with possession of firearms without authority, contrary to Section 8, punishable under Section 25(2)(a) of the Arms and Ammunition Act. The prosecution alleges that on February 8 2025, at EL-HELLA Shop in Banjul, the two unlawfully possessed two unidentified pistols and thirteen without a license from the Inspector General of Police. source Kexx Sanneh Follow Everyone Top Fans @highlight