Tri-vergence or Turmoil? Opposition’s “Harmony Pact” Sparks Questions Ahead of December Showdown

By Yaya Dampha NPP Diaspora Coordinator, Sweden

The recent announcement by six opposition parties in The Gambia that they have signed what they call a “Harmony Pact” under the banner of the Tri-vergence Accord has been presented as a step toward unity ahead of the December 5 presidential election. However, beneath the appealing language of cooperation and good faith lies a number of serious political questions.

At its core, the accord is described as a voluntary and non-binding moral commitment designed to reduce hostility and mistrust among rival camps. Yet the very need for such a pact exposes the deep divisions within the opposition. If genuine trust and shared purpose already existed, there would be no requirement for a formal agreement instructing members and supporters to avoid inflammatory rhetoric.

The pact does not resolve the central issue confronting the opposition: leadership. Multiple presidential aspirants remain in competition, each seeking to secure the coalition ticket. Ambition, ego, and political survival are powerful forces. Without a clear and agreed leadership structure, declarations of harmony risk being symbolic rather than substantive.

Furthermore, the agreement calls on party members and supporters to refrain from incitement and public hostility. However, much of the antagonism in Gambian politics occurs online and at the grassroots level. If party executives truly exercise discipline and command loyalty within their ranks, such hostilities would already be under control. The gap between official pronouncements and the behavior of supporters raises legitimate doubts about enforcement and sincerity.

Another point worth noting is that the pact is not legally binding. It carries no enforceable consequences should any party withdraw or violate its spirit. In a political environment where alliances shift quickly, a moral commitment without institutional safeguards provides little assurance of stability.

While opposition figures continue to criticize the government, they have yet to convincingly articulate a unified alternative program that inspires broad national confidence. Persistent attacks, without a clear and cohesive policy vision, may signal frustration more than readiness to govern.

In contrast, supporters of the remain confident in the record of development and governance delivered to the Gambian people. Elections are ultimately decided not by press statements or symbolic accords, but by credibility, performance, and trust.

The so-called Tri-vergence Accord may represent an attempt at damage control or internal confidence-building. However, unity must be demonstrated through action, clarity of leadership, and consistent messaging—not merely through carefully crafted communiqués.

As the campaign season approaches, Gambians will be watching closely. Whether this pact marks the beginning of genuine convergence or merely reflects coordinated confusion remains to be seen.