By Yaya Dampha NPP Diaspora Coordinator Sweden
Alagi Yorro Jallow is right to warn Senegal about the dangerous rise of political revisionism and personality-driven narratives. His reflection about the mandate of Bassirou Diomaye Faye and the decisive role of the Diomaye Coalition should not be dismissed as partisan rhetoric. It is a factual reminder that modern democratic victories are rarely the triumph of a single individual. They are almost always the product of coalitions, compromise, and collective sacrifice.
Those of us who observed and participated in the democratic struggle in The Gambia understand this reality very well.
In 2016, after the imprisonment of Ousainou Darboe and several executives of the United Democratic Party (UDP), the opposition faced a historic crossroads. In a moment of necessity, the UDP leadership endorsed a relatively unknown businessman, Adama Barrow, as its presidential candidate. But Barrow did not become the symbol of change because of the UDP alone. He emerged through negotiations among a broad coalition of opposition parties and civil society actors who agreed that unity, not ego, was the only path to defeat dictatorship.
Barrow went through coalition consultations, won the coalition primary, became the unified opposition candidate, and ultimately defeated the long-standing ruler Yahya Jammeh. That victory was not the achievement of one party. It was the collective triumph of Gambians who rallied behind a coalition for democratic change.
However, history took a troubling turn after Darboe’s release from prison. He was appointed Foreign Minister and later Vice President. Yet instead of consolidating the spirit of coalition politics, unilateral decisions and confrontational rhetoric began to dominate the political atmosphere. Some supporters within the UDP started belittling President Barrow as an “accidental president,” claiming he owed his victory solely to Darboe and the UDP.
Such arguments ignore the central truth of coalition politics: no coalition victory belongs to one individual or one party.
Ironically, since distancing itself from the coalition framework, the UDP and Darboe forgot the fact that they have suffered four consecutive electoral defeats in the hands of Yahya Jammeh. The 2021 election results proved them wrong when Adama Barrow defeated Ousainou Darboe outrightly. This is not merely a political coincidence; it is a reminder that popularity within a party base or on the streets does not always translate into electoral victory.
The same lesson may be unfolding today in Senegal.
Ousmane Sonko, like Darboe in The Gambia, commands undeniable street popularity. His supporters are passionate, vocal, and emotionally invested in his political persona. But politics is not measured by street enthusiasm alone. Electoral success requires broad national alliances, institutional respect, and the humility to recognize the contributions of others.
This is precisely the point that Jallow makes about the Diomaye Coalition. When the political party structure collapsed and legal barriers threatened the candidacy of Diomaye, it was the coalition that carried the legal, financial, and organizational burden. The coalition mobilized voters across Senegal’s diverse political spectrum, ultimately securing the 54 percent mandate that brought Faye to power.
To attempt to erase that coalition and rewrite the story as a single-hero narrative is not only historically inaccurate; it is politically dangerous.
Even more troubling is the contradiction emerging in recent events. The same youth movements that once mobilized passionately in support of Sonko and the broader opposition struggle now find themselves confronting state security forces during protests at universities. Reports of police repression against young demonstrators raise difficult questions about whether revolutionary rhetoric has now given way to the harsh realities of governing.
Democratic politics cannot survive on antagonism, revenge, or emotional mobilization alone. Successful leadership requires restraint, maturity, and the ability to transform movements into institutions.
That is why President Faye’s metaphor about circumcision, as Jallow explains, should be understood not as a casual remark but as a cultural symbol of political maturity and responsibility. Leadership in Africa has always carried this deeper meaning: initiation into the burden of governing with discipline and restraint.
In this sense, Senegal now stands at a crossroads familiar to many African democracies.
Will its politics evolve toward coalition governance, institutional respect, and national unity?
Or will it descend into the same destructive cycle of personality cults, historical revisionism, and factional revenge that has destabilized many political movements after victory?
The Gambian experience offers a clear lesson: when pride replaces pragmatism, and when individuals attempt to rewrite collective victories as personal triumphs, political movements inevitably fracture.
Coalitions win elections.
Ego divides them.
Senegal would do well to remember this truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment