Who Gave Baba Galleh Jallow the Moral Authority to Lecture the Nation?

By Yaya Dampha

NPP Diaspora Coordinator, Sweden

The recent article by Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow, written under the banner of the so-called Never Again Network, opposing President Adama Barrow’s potential third-term bid, is not only intellectually shallow but legally unsustainable and morally hypocritical.

Before Dr. Jallow attempts to posture as the national conscience on matters of democracy and constitutionalism, he owes the Gambian people a clear explanation for the deeply troubling legacy he left behind at the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC)—an institution he served as Executive Secretary.

The fundamental question therefore arises: who is Baba Galleh Jallow to lecture the Gambian people about democracy when the very institution he administered left many genuine victims unrecognized while elevating questionable testimonies to official status?

The Constitution, Not Baba Galleh Jallow, Determines Presidential Terms

Let us begin with the law.

The 1997 Constitution of the Republic of The Gambia, which remains the supreme law of the land under Section 4, clearly provides that the presidency is determined through democratic elections every five years.

There is no constitutional provision limiting a president to two terms in the current constitution.

Therefore, President Adama Barrow seeking another term—whether a third or otherwise—is not unconstitutional. It is simply a democratic right that must be decided by the Gambian electorate at the ballot box.

Dr. Jallow’s argument is therefore a political opinion disguised as constitutional authority.

In any genuine democracy, the decision does not belong to activists, networks, commentators, or former TRRC officials—it belongs to the sovereign will of the Gambian people.

Coalition Agreements Are Not Constitutional Law

Dr. Jallow’s argument about the 2016 coalition agreement is equally flawed.

While the coalition may have politically proposed a three-year transition, the reality remains that political agreements do not override constitutional law.

Once President Barrow was elected under the 1997 Constitution, his mandate became a five-year constitutional term, just like every other president elected under that same constitution.

No coalition document signed among political actors can supersede the legal authority of the constitution. To argue otherwise is to promote constitutional confusion dressed up as moral outrage.

The Hypocrisy of “Never Again”

The phrase Never Again should carry profound moral weight in The Gambia. It symbolizes a collective commitment to justice for victims of past abuses.

Yet under the leadership of Baba Galleh Jallow’s Secretariat, the TRRC produced outcomes that many victims consider deeply discriminatory and profoundly unjust.

One must therefore ask: how did the Commission determine who qualifies as a victim?

Why were individuals with clear historical records of arrest, torture, persecution and forced exile excluded from recognition?

Why was Musa Saidykhan—an internationally recognized torture survivor—excluded from the official list of victims?

Why were victims like myself, Yaya Dampha, and the family of the late Almamo Manneh, who was extrajudicially executed, not recognized by the Commission?

If we were not victims, why were we invited to testify before the TRRC?

Our testimonies are on record. The historical facts are documented.

Almamo Manneh was extrajudicially executed, just as Harouna Jammeh was.

Musa Saidykhan was tortured and permanently maimed, just as Bunja Darboe was.

Yet the TRRC under Baba Galleh Jallow’s Secretariat segregated victims—recognizing some while ignoring others.

Meanwhile, individuals whose testimonies raised serious credibility questions somehow found themselves included in the official reparations framework.

This raises troubling questions about transparency, methodology and integrity in the Commission’s victim determination process.

Accountability Must Begin with the TRRC Leadership

Before Baba Galleh Jallow lectures the nation about safeguarding democracy, he should first explain to the Gambian people:

What criteria did the TRRC use to determine who qualifies as a victim?

Who made the final determinations within the Secretariat?

Why were legitimate victims excluded from recognition?

Why were questionable testimonies accepted without sufficient scrutiny?

These are legitimate questions that deserve clear and honest answers.

Victims of the Jammeh era deserve justice—not selective recognition or administrative indifference.

The Convenient Return of Political Activism

It is also remarkable that some of the loudest voices today were silent when they held real institutional authority.

During their tenure at the TRRC, they possessed enormous power to ensure fairness, transparency and justice.

Instead, many used that platform to enhance international reputations, secure prestigious global engagements, and build impressive professional résumés before quietly moving on to greener pastures.

Now that some of those contracts and international engagements appear to be winding down, they suddenly reappear as political activists offering lectures on democracy.

The Gambian people are neither naïve nor forgetful.

They recognize opportunism when they see it.

Democracy Belongs to the Gambian People

Whether President Adama Barrow chooses to contest another election is not the decision of Baba Galleh Jallow.

It is not the decision of the Never Again Network.

And it is certainly not the decision of commentators seeking renewed political relevance.

It is a decision that belongs solely to the Gambian people through democratic elections.

That is the essence of democracy.

If Gambians believe President Barrow deserves another mandate, they will vote for him.

If they believe otherwise, they will vote him out.

That choice belongs to the electorate—not to self-appointed guardians of political morality.

The Real Betrayal

The real betrayal of the victims of the Jammeh era is not a presidential election.

The real betrayal would be a transitional justice process that failed to recognize all victims fairly and equally.

Until Baba Galleh Jallow confronts that moral failure and explains the inconsistencies of the TRRC’s victim recognition process, he lacks the credibility to lecture the nation on democracy and constitutionalism.

Those who presided over such a flawed process should approach the national conversation with humility rather than arrogance.

The Gambian people deserve honesty, fairness and accountability—not selective outrage and revisionist activism.

Democracy belongs to the people, not to self-appointed custodians of political virtue.

REJOINDER: HISTORY IS NOT YOURS TO EDIT, MADI JOBARTEH

Why the truth of the 2002–2004 media struggle must not be rewritten

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

In public discourse, disagreement is expected. What is not acceptable, however, is the deliberate distortion of verifiable facts in an attempt to recast history. Madi Jobarteh’s recent article in The Alkamba Times, purporting to revisit the 2002–2004 National Media Commission (NMC) struggle, falls squarely into that troubling category.

His account is not merely flawed—it is revisionist.

At the heart of this matter lies a simple, indisputable truth: the legal challenge against the NMC Act is a matter of public record. In Gambia Press Union & Others v. National Media Commission & Another (Civil Suit No. 5/2005), the Supreme Court of The Gambia clearly identified the plaintiffs who stood against the law. These included the Gambia Press Union (GPU), Deyda Hydara, Alagi Yorro Jallow, Demba Ali Jawo, and Swaebou Conateh.

This is not opinion. It is fact—documented, archived, and accessible.

Yet, in his attempt to reconstruct this pivotal moment in Gambian media history, Madi Jobarteh conspicuously omits my name while introducing individuals who were not party to the case. Such a departure from the record cannot be dismissed as oversight. It raises serious questions about intent and credibility.

Let us be clear: the constitutional challenge to the NMC Act was not a symbolic exercise. It was a defining confrontation with state power at a time when dissent carried real risks. The individuals named in the court filings were not commentators or retrospective analysts; they were active participants in a legal battle that helped shape press freedom in The Gambia.

To substitute or omit names from that record is to alter history itself.

It must also be stated that those referenced by Jobarteh—respected as they may be in their own right—were not plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case. They neither signed the legal petition nor stood before the court in that action. To suggest otherwise is to mislead the public and undermine the integrity of the historical record.

This discussion is not about personal differences. It is about preserving truth in a space where accuracy matters. The history of the NMC struggle is too important to be reduced to selective storytelling or retrospective positioning.

Indeed, Jobarteh is correct in one respect: contemporary legislative proposals echo troubling aspects of past regulatory overreach, now extending into the digital sphere. That is a conversation worth having. But any meaningful critique of present challenges must be grounded in factual integrity. One cannot defend democracy by distorting history.

If we are to invoke the legacy of figures such as Deyda Hydara, we must do so with honesty. The principles he stood for—truth, accountability, and courage—demand nothing less.

The struggle against the NMC Act was not fought in comfort or hindsight. It was waged in a climate of fear and uncertainty, where taking a stand came with consequences. Those who participated did so at personal and professional risk. That reality must not be diluted.

History does not belong to any one individual to edit or reinterpret at will. It is a collective record, anchored in evidence. Court documents do not shift with narratives, and facts do not yield to preference.

In the final analysis, attempts to rewrite this chapter of Gambian history say more about the reviser than the events themselves. The record remains intact. The names are documented. And the truth endures.

No amount of revisionism can alter that.

STATE-LED SKILLS DRIVE IGNITES NEW HOPE FOR PWDs NATIONWIDE

By Madi S. Njie

In a bold demonstration of its unwavering commitment to inclusive development, the Government of The Gambia, through the National Advisory Council for Persons with Disabilities (NACPWD) and the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Welfare, has successfully delivered a transformative nationwide training programme aimed at economically empowering Persons with Disabilities (PWDs).

Held from 16th to 18th March 2026, the intensive three-day initiative is being hailed as a landmark intervention designed to unlock the potential of PWDs by equipping them with practical skills in entrepreneurship, digital innovation, and vocational development—key pillars of the country’s broader development agenda.

The programme commenced at the GOVI Resource Centre in Kanifing, where participants from Organisations of Persons with Disabilities (OPDs) under the Gambia Federation of the Disabled converged in large numbers, reflecting growing confidence in government-led empowerment initiatives. The momentum continued across the regions, culminating in a major provincial convergence at the Mansakonko Area Council, drawing participants from Lower River, North Bank, Central River, and Upper River Regions.

This strategic rollout underscores the government’s firm resolve to ensure that no Gambian is left behind. It directly advances the implementation of the Persons with Disabilities Act 2021, while reinforcing The Gambia’s standing commitment to global standards under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).

Officials described the initiative as a game-changer in shifting PWDs from dependency to productivity. Speaking at the opening, Principal Social Welfare Officer Mr. Modou Suwareh emphasized that true independence can only be achieved when individuals are empowered with relevant, market-driven skills.

“Skills development is the cornerstone of dignity and self-reliance,” he declared, urging participants to seize the opportunity as a stepping stone to economic freedom.

Chairman of NACPWD, His Worship Muhammed Krubally, reinforced the government’s inclusive vision, stressing that equality and non-discrimination are no longer aspirations but actionable realities under the current leadership. He noted that empowering PWDs is central to building a resilient and equitable society.

“We are determined to see persons with disabilities rise as creators of wealth and drivers of national progress,” he affirmed.

Director of Social Welfare, Mr. Alaye Barra, acknowledged longstanding structural challenges but pointed to innovation and technology as powerful tools now being leveraged to bridge those gaps. He highlighted that digital skills, combined with entrepreneurship, are opening new frontiers for PWDs to compete and thrive in today’s economy.

Adding further weight to the initiative, Deputy Permanent Secretary Mr. Delo Bah described the training as a “defining milestone” in the government’s social inclusion agenda. He reiterated that empowering PWDs is not just a social responsibility but a strategic investment in national development.

“By providing practical tools and knowledge, we are enabling active participation in the economy and strengthening the country’s human capital base,” he stated.

The training sessions—facilitated by seasoned experts including Ms. Jobe, Alex Pratt, and Mr. Abdoulie Demba Bah—covered critical areas such as business management, digital marketing, and enterprise development. Participants also received assurances of continued mentorship, including free advisory support for business registration—further solidifying the programme’s long-term impact.

Across all regions, participants expressed renewed optimism, describing the initiative as life-changing. Many indicated readiness to launch or expand their businesses, signaling a shift toward self-reliance and economic independence.

Stakeholders have since called for sustained investment in disability inclusion, particularly in enhancing access to digital platforms, assistive technologies, and startup financing. They also emphasized the importance of forming cooperative structures to strengthen collaboration and ensure long-term growth.

This landmark initiative stands as clear evidence of a government not only listening but delivering—creating real opportunities, restoring dignity, and empowering every citizen to contribute meaningfully to national development.

Indeed, The Gambia is steadily advancing toward a future where inclusion is not a privilege, but a guaranteed right for all.

Another Major Endorsement: Jarra News Echoes My Call for Media Reform.

By Alagi Yorro Jallow 

 I am humbled to see Jarra News join the growing national conversation sparked by my recent commentary on the state of journalism in The Gambia. Their detailed analysis affirms what many of us have been warning for years: the crisis in Gambian journalism is internal before it is external.

Jarra News highlights critical issues that can no longer be ignored: the collapse of standards, the rise of untrained voices, the politicization of newsrooms, the erosion of ethics, and the dangerous normalization of defamation and misinformation. Their conclusion is clear and uncompromising: reform is no longer optional; it is necessary for the survival of the profession.

This endorsement follows the earlier editorial support from the Daily Observer, signaling a broader awakening within the media landscape. The message from both institutions is unmistakable:

Accreditation, professionalism, and ethical discipline are essential if journalism is to reclaim its dignity and public trust.

 welcome this growing alignment and hope it inspires deeper reflection, honest dialogue, and meaningful reform across the sector. The future of our democracy depends on a credible, responsible, and principled Fourth Estate. The unified essay, The Rain That Beat Us: A Manifesto for Redeeming Gambia’s Fourth Estate, is now available for publication and public engagement.

DEFENDING THE CRAFT: WHY PROFESSIONALIZATION OF GAMBIAN JOURNALISM CANNOT WAIT

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

The commentary by Alagi Yorro Jallow is not just timely—it is a necessary intervention in a profession that is rapidly losing its soul. What we are witnessing in The Gambia today is not merely a debate over accreditation; it is a full-blown collapse of standards, discipline, and identity within journalism.

1. The Collapse of Standards Is Real, Not Imagined

There is no denying it: journalism in The Gambia has shifted from a disciplined profession to an open marketplace where anyone with a smartphone claims authority. The absence of editorial control, fact-checking, and ethical restraint has turned many platforms into channels of confusion rather than sources of truth. This is not press freedom—it is professional decay.

2. Journalism Has Been Hijacked by Activism and Partisanship

The line between journalism and political activism has not just blurred—it has disappeared. Many who present themselves as journalists are openly aligned with political interests, acting as spokespersons rather than watchdogs. When journalists become political griots, public trust inevitably collapses.

3. Former Guardians of the Profession Have Abandoned It

It is deeply troubling that individuals who once led the Gambia Press Union now contribute to the very decline they should resist. Instead of defending standards, some have embraced propaganda, partisanship, and sensationalism. This moral inconsistency weakens their credibility in opposing reforms like accreditation.

4. Untrained Individuals Are Dominating the Media Space

A dangerous trend has emerged where comedians, entertainers, and social media influencers now occupy spaces meant for trained journalists. Without knowledge of media law, ethics, or verification, they produce content that misleads, defames, and inflames. Journalism is a discipline—not a hobby or a side hustle.

5. Social Media Has Become a Lawless Newsroom

Facebook “journalists” now publish anything—from private conversations to abusive audio recordings—without consent, context, or verification. The rights to privacy and dignity are routinely violated in the name of “breaking news.” This is not journalism; it is digital vigilantism.

6. Defamation and Character Assassination Are Becoming Normalized

The reckless publication of insults, especially targeting families and parents, reflects a dangerous erosion of ethics. Freedom of expression does not include the freedom to defame, insult, or destroy reputations without accountability. A profession that tolerates this loses its moral authority.

7. Absence of Regulation Has Turned Journalism into a “Dustbin Profession”

Without standards or entry requirements, journalism has become a dumping ground for individuals rejected by other professions. This lack of structure invites mediocrity and drives away serious practitioners who once upheld the dignity of the field.

8. Accreditation Is a Necessary Filter, Not a Political Weapon

As rightly argued by Alagi Yorro Jallow, accreditation is a global norm. It does not silence journalists; it distinguishes professionals from opportunists. It ensures that those who inform the public are trained, accountable, and ethically grounded.

9. Public Trust in the Media Is Rapidly Eroding

When misinformation, bias, and unverified claims dominate headlines, the public loses confidence in all media—both credible and non-credible. This erosion of trust is dangerous for democracy, as citizens can no longer distinguish fact from propaganda. 

10. Government Regulation Is Now Inevitable and Necessary

Given the current chaos, government intervention—if properly structured—is no longer optional. Regulation must not be confused with repression. Instead, it should

Establish minimum standards for practice

Enforce ethical codes

Protect citizens from defamation and privacy violations

Restore credibility to the profession.

Without such frameworks, the media space will continue to deteriorate into an uncontrollable информационный battlefield.

11. Freedom Without Responsibility Is Anarchy

Press freedom was fought for with sacrifice, including the ultimate price paid by Deyda Hydara. To misuse that freedom today through recklessness and indiscipline is a betrayal of that legacy. Freedom must be matched with responsibility, or it becomes self-destructive.

12. The Silence on Past Reform Failures Is Hypocrisy

It is valid to question why past reform efforts—such as those linked to Ndey Tapha Sosseh—were never implemented or defended. Those who ignored reform yesterday cannot convincingly oppose professionalization today.

13. Editors and Newsrooms Have Failed Their Gatekeeping Role

The disappearance of strong editorial oversight has allowed misinformation to flourish. A newsroom without standards is not a newsroom—it is a rumor distribution center. Editors must reclaim their role as custodians of truth.

14. Professional Journalism Requires Training and Discipline

Journalism is not defined by access to a microphone or camera. It requires mastery of language, understanding of context, commitment to verification, and respect for ethics. Without these, what exists is not journalism but noise.

Conclusion: Reform or Ruin.

The position advanced by Alagi Yorro Jallow is clear and justified: the crisis in Gambian journalism is internal before it is external. The profession is collapsing under the weight of indiscipline, politicization, and neglect.

The choice before The Gambia is stark: either restore standards through professionalization and accreditation, or allow journalism to disintegrate into irrelevance and public distrust.

This is not about silencing voices. It is about saving a profession that has lost its direction. The time for denial has passed. The time for reform is now.

Driving Justice Forward: Government Coordinates Nationwide Push to Implement TRRC Reforms

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

The Government of The Gambia has intensified efforts to translate the recommendations of the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) into concrete reforms, with a coordinated approach that now spans dozens of public institutions.

Ida Persson, Special Adviser on Transitional Justice and head of the Post-TRRC Unit at the Ministry of Justice, revealed that the implementation process is being carried out in collaboration with 59 institutions across the country. Her remarks came during a recent interview with investigative journalist Mustapha K. Darboe, where she shed light on the scale and complexity of the ongoing reform agenda.

According to Persson, her office plays a dual role—providing high-level strategic advice to the Minister of Justice while also steering the operational coordination of post-TRRC activities. She emphasized that beyond government structures, civil society actors remain key stakeholders in shaping public discourse and sustaining momentum around the reforms.

At the core of the initiative is a structured implementation plan managed by a dedicated team tasked with ensuring that responsible institutions are equipped with the financial and technical resources required to deliver. This includes mobilising funding through grants and fostering partnerships to maintain steady progress.

The reform agenda itself is extensive. It is anchored on critical pillars such as reparations for victims, justice and accountability mechanisms, institutional restructuring, legislative changes, and the promotion of national unity. In total, the plan encompasses 39 distinct activities and proposes reforms to more than 22 pieces of legislation.

Persson further disclosed that plans are underway to establish a Special Prosecutor’s Office to handle cases related to international crimes committed under the former regime. She noted that while an international tribunal could cost up to $16 million, pursuing domestic prosecutions presents a more viable option at an estimated cost of $2.5 million—offering a pragmatic pathway toward justice.

As implementation efforts gather pace, the government’s approach signals a determined shift from recommendations to action, with stakeholders across sectors expected to play a role in shaping a more accountable and just society.

Binta Jallow Nabbed in Drug Smuggling Attempts at Mile 2 Prison

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

Authorities have raised alarm over a growing trend of individuals attempting to smuggle prohibited substances into the Mile 2 Central Prison under the pretext of delivering food to inmates.

In recent weeks, security officials have intercepted multiple cases involving concealed drugs. Notably, a young man from the Yundum area was apprehended after allegedly attempting to sneak a prohibited substance locally known as “kush,” hidden inside packets of instant noodles.

In a similar development, on Monday, 16 March 2026, prison authorities arrested Miss Binta Jallow, a resident of Brikama Newtown, for allegedly attempting to smuggle drugs into the facility. According to officials, the suspect had visited the prison to deliver food to a remand prisoner when a routine security screening uncovered a plastic bag containing suspected cannabis and pills concealed inside a food bowl.

She was immediately detained and subsequently handed over to the Drug Law Enforcement Agency, The Gambia (DLEAG), for further investigation and possible prosecution in accordance with national drug laws.

Prison authorities, working in close collaboration with DLEAG, have reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining strict security measures and ensuring that correctional facilities remain free from illegal substances. They have issued a stern warning to the public that any attempt to smuggle contraband into prisons constitutes a serious criminal offence and will be dealt with decisively.

Editorial Note: A Call to Youths

The increasing involvement of young people in drug smuggling and trafficking is deeply troubling. What may appear to be a quick way to make money or assist acquaintances is, in reality, a dangerous path that leads to arrest, prosecution, and long-term consequences that can permanently damage one’s future.

Young people must understand that engaging in drug-related activities—whether as users, couriers, or dealers—comes with severe legal and social repercussions. It is not worth sacrificing your freedom, reputation, and opportunities for short-term gains.

Jarranews urge youths across the country to resist peer pressure, avoid criminal networks, and channel their energy into productive and lawful ventures. The fight against drug abuse and trafficking is a collective responsibility, and the future of the nation depends on the choices its young people make today.

Say no to drugs. Choose a better path.

Exposed in Broad Daylight: How Fatoumatta Jallow Tambajang’s False Claims Collapsed Under Facts and Accountability

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator

Alagi Yorro Jallow’s recent commentary stands as a timely and necessary intervention in a political climate increasingly threatened by misinformation and reckless public discourse. His analysis does not merely challenge a claim—it exposes a dangerous pattern that undermines democratic integrity and public trust.

The allegations made by former Vice President Fatoumatta Jallow Tambajang regarding the supposed diversion of European Union funds to the National People’s Party (NPP) were not only unverified but demonstrably false. As clearly outlined in Jallow’s fact-based critique, these claims lacked evidence, documentation, and any attempt at verification through established channels such as the Freedom of Information framework. In a democracy, such conduct is not just irresponsible—it is deeply damaging.

Both the NPP and the European Union swiftly and categorically refuted these allegations. The EU clarified its institutional position: it engages exclusively with the Government of The Gambia, not political parties. The funds referenced by Tambajang were not EU disbursements but voluntary contributions from supporters. Yet, despite these clarifications, the misinformation had already circulated widely, illustrating how quickly falsehood can distort public perception before truth catches up.

At a time when the nation requires sober reflection and responsible leadership, it is troubling that a figure of such seniority would choose speculation over facts. Fatoumatta Jallow Tambajang, with her vast political experience and generational influence, carries a responsibility not only to her peers but also to her children, grandchildren, and the wider Gambian society. Public trust is not a tool to be manipulated—it is a duty to be preserved.

Contrary to her claims, the NPP’s funding model is transparent and rooted in grassroots mobilization. The party relies heavily on membership dues, diaspora engagement, and voluntary contributions from supporters. On November 4th in Bañola, Spain, NPP diaspora groups organized a fundraising event that raised an impressive 24 million dalasis in a single day. Additional initiatives within The Gambia generated over 6 million dalasis, complemented by efforts from the party’s central committee. These are verifiable, people-driven contributions—not the product of any misappropriated international funds.

What makes this episode particularly concerning is its resemblance to past political behavior that Gambians have already rejected. The use of emotional rhetoric, religious overtones, and unverified claims to shape public opinion is not new. It is a strategy that has previously eroded trust and credibility in governance. The re-emergence of such tactics only reinforces the urgency of demanding higher standards in public discourse.

Alagi Yorro Jallow’s article methodically dismantles Tambajang’s assertions, exposing not only their inaccuracy but also the broader implications of such “shenanigans behavior” in our politics. When influential figures present conjecture as fact, they do more than misinform—they weaken the very institutions that sustain democracy.

This moment must serve as a turning point. Politicians must verify before they speak. Journalists must rigorously fact-check before they publish. Citizens must engage critically with the information they consume. Truth must not be optional; it must be foundational.

Fatoumatta Jallow Tambajang’s claims have been tested against facts—and they have failed. What remains is a clear lesson: misinformation may travel fast, but truth, when pursued with diligence and courage, will always prevail.

The Gambian people deserve leadership grounded in honesty, accountability, and respect for truth. Anything less is a disservice to the nation and a threat to its democratic future.

Hypocrisy, Habitual Negativity, and the Politics of Opposition for Opposition’s Sake

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator

The reaction of some supporters of the United Democratic Party to the government’s purchase of a modern state-of-the-art ferry is yet another embarrassing display of political hypocrisy and blind opposition.

For years these same voices have screamed that the ferries serving the Banjul–Barra Ferry Crossing are old, unreliable, and constantly breaking down. Every mechanical fault was turned into propaganda against the government. Every delay was framed as proof of incompetence.

Now that President Adama Barrow has taken the practical step of acquiring a modern ferry capable of carrying 800 passengers and multiple trucks, the same critics are suddenly outraged.

So which is it?

Were the ferries too old and unreliable, or should the government refuse to modernize them?

This is not criticism. It is pure political bad faith.

1. The Ferry Hypocrisy

UDP supporters complained relentlessly that ferries were outdated and unsafe.

Now that the government invests in a modern replacement, they complain again.

If government does nothing — they complain.

If government solves the problem — they complain louder.

That is not accountability; that is politics of sabotage.

2. The Electricity Hypocrisy

When rural electrification projects began under President Barrow, the same critics said:

“Those poles will never see electricity.”

But when electricity finally reached those communities, the narrative suddenly changed to:

“Those people are hungry; they need food more than electricity.”

So the question is simple:

Are rural Gambians not entitled to electricity and development?

Electricity powers schools, clinics, businesses, refrigeration, irrigation, and communication. Only those who have never experienced development planning would pretend otherwise.

3. The Road Development Hypocrisy.

When highways and rural roads are constructed, the UDP chorus repeats the same tired slogan:

 “Are we going to eat roads?”

This is perhaps the most economically illiterate argument in modern Gambian politics.

Roads are the arteries of development. They allow farmers to move crops to markets, traders to move goods, ambulances to reach hospitals, and businesses to expand into rural areas. Without roads, there is no commerce, no tourism expansion, and no regional trade.

Anyone who claims development should happen without roads clearly does not understand development.

4. Opposition That Opposes Everything

At this point, one must agree with a friend who once said:

 "It is dangerous for a political party to remain in opposition for too long"

The United Democratic Party has become so accustomed to opposing that it now opposes everything — even progress.

This is the same party that, while part of the coalition government from 2017 to 2019, organized protest marches against its own leadership. Imagine that level of confusion — protesting a government you are part of.

That is not responsible politics. That is political addiction to chaos.

5. The Bridge Argument Is Another False Narrative

Now they claim that because President Adama Barrow promised to build a bridge across the Banjul–Barra Ferry Crossing, he should not buy a ferry.

This argument ignores the basic reality of governance.

Major infrastructure projects take years of planning, financing, and construction. Governments must manage short-term needs while preparing long-term solutions.

The same logic applied to the Senegambia Bridge at Yelitenda–Bambatenda.

The idea of that bridge was first declared more than forty years ago by former president Dawda Kairaba Jawara. Yet it remained unfulfilled through his administration and for 22 years under Yahya Jammeh.

It was President Adama Barrow who finally delivered it.

That is the difference between talking about development and actually implementing it.

6. Development Requires Planning, Not Noise

Governments plan for the future through short-term, medium-term, and long-term strategies. Buying a ferry to solve immediate transport challenges does not contradict the vision of building a bridge.

Only those who deliberately refuse to understand governance would pretend otherwise.

Conclusion

At this stage, the pattern is obvious.

When development is proposed — the UDP attacks it.

When development begins — the UDP mocks it.

When development succeeds — the UDP changes the argument.

This endless negativity does not help Gambians. It only exposes a political culture that has become so obsessed with opposing President Barrow that it now opposes progress itself.

Gambia deserves constructive criticism, not reflex opposition driven by bitterness and political desperation.

Rebuttal to the UDP West Coast Region Chairman

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator – Sweden

The statement coming from the United Democratic Party (UDP) West Coast Region Chairman is nothing more than a desperate attempt to manufacture fear and suspicion ahead of the December elections. What we are witnessing is a classic political strategy: when a party begins to sense the possibility of defeat, it starts laying the groundwork to question the credibility of the very democratic processes it once benefited from.

First and foremost, it is important to remind the Gambian public that since 2017, the political environment in The Gambia has become more open, tolerant, and accommodating than at any other time in our history. Opposition parties, including the UDP, operate freely across the country. They hold rallies, organise meetings, and campaign openly without the intimidation and repression that once defined our political landscape. Security forces now provide protection to all political parties equally during campaigns and public gatherings. Therefore, the suggestion that the electoral playing field is somehow tilted against the opposition is simply not supported by the facts.

Secondly, the UDP’s sudden concern about “inflammatory speech” is deeply ironic. Anyone who follows Gambian politics knows that UDP supporters and activists are among the most aggressive voices on social media and political platforms. Daily insults directed at political opponents and even their parents have become a regrettable norm in some of their online spaces. In many cases, their supporters have even been involved in physical confrontations with political opponents on the streets. For such a party to now pretend to be the guardian of civil political discourse is nothing short of a mockery.

Thirdly, the voter registration process in The Gambia is governed by clear legal procedures under the electoral laws. If anyone believes that a particular individual has fraudulently obtained a voter’s card, the law provides a clear and legitimate path: raise the objection at the revising court and present evidence. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. It is not enough to stand outside registration centres and intimidate citizens by labeling them “foreigners” without evidence. Such behaviour undermines the rights and dignity of Gambian citizens and only creates unnecessary tension in communities.

Furthermore, the Gambian electoral system remains one of the most transparent in the region. From the campaign period to the actual voting process, counting of ballots, and announcement of results, every stage is monitored by party agents representing all contesting political parties. National and international observers are also present to ensure credibility and transparency. In fact, by the time the Independent Electoral Commission announces the final results, every political party already knows the outcome from each polling station through their own agents.

With the introduction of spot counting at polling stations, the process has become even more transparent. Results are counted openly in the presence of party agents, observers, and members of the public immediately after voting. This makes it virtually impossible to manipulate the outcome without detection.

What the UDP leadership should be doing at this stage is preparing their policies and programmes to convince Gambian voters—not attempting to cast doubt on institutions simply because they fear electoral rejection. Democracy requires maturity, responsibility, and respect for institutions.

The Gambian people are politically aware and capable of making their own choices. No amount of political alarmism will change that reality.

Instead of spreading mistrust, all political actors should focus on promoting peace, respect, and issue-based campaigning. The December elections will ultimately be decided by the will of the Gambian people, and that will must be respected by all.

Fear of defeat should never become an excuse to undermine the credibility of our democratic institutions.

Major Road Upgrade Begins in Gunjur

A major road construction project has officially started in Gunjur, bringing renewed optimism to residents who have long awaited improvements to the town’s main transport route.

Heavy machinery and construction crews from HAGE Group have begun work on the town’s principal road. The project will see the road built with a concrete surface, a more resilient material expected to better withstand heavy traffic and the harsh conditions that often affect roads during both the dry and rainy seasons.

The initiative forms part of the government’s nationwide road infrastructure drive under the administration of Adama Barrow. In recent years, the programme has focused on expanding and modernizing road networks across the country to improve transportation and stimulate local economies.

For decades, residents of Gunjur have struggled with difficult road conditions. During the dry season, thick dust clouds have been a common problem, while the rainy season often leaves the road muddy and nearly impassable. These conditions have frequently disrupted daily activities for motorists, traders, schoolchildren, and pedestrians.

The road runs through the heart of the community, connecting residential areas, local markets, schools, and neighboring coastal settlements. Its reconstruction is expected to ease transportation challenges and support economic activities within the town.

In addition to the main Gunjur road project, work is also progressing on another important route linking Gunjur to Jambanjelly through Kunkujang.

This road serves as a key connection for surrounding communities, facilitating the movement of farmers, fishermen, traders, and commuters between inland areas and the coast.

When completed, the projects are expected to strengthen transportation links across the southern parts of the West Coast Region, an area experiencing steady population growth and increasing economic activity.

For the people of Gunjur, however, the start of construction on their main road represents a particularly meaningful development — the beginning of a transformation that many in the community have hoped to see for years.

Coalitions, Not Personalities: Lessons from The Gambia for Senegal’s Political Moment

By Yaya Dampha NPP Diaspora Coordinator Sweden 

Alagi Yorro Jallow is right to warn Senegal about the dangerous rise of political revisionism and personality-driven narratives. His reflection about the mandate of Bassirou Diomaye Faye and the decisive role of the Diomaye Coalition should not be dismissed as partisan rhetoric. It is a factual reminder that modern democratic victories are rarely the triumph of a single individual. They are almost always the product of coalitions, compromise, and collective sacrifice.

Those of us who observed and participated in the democratic struggle in The Gambia understand this reality very well.

In 2016, after the imprisonment of Ousainou Darboe and several executives of the United Democratic Party (UDP), the opposition faced a historic crossroads. In a moment of necessity, the UDP leadership endorsed a relatively unknown businessman, Adama Barrow, as its presidential candidate. But Barrow did not become the symbol of change because of the UDP alone. He emerged through negotiations among a broad coalition of opposition parties and civil society actors who agreed that unity, not ego, was the only path to defeat dictatorship.

Barrow went through coalition consultations, won the coalition primary, became the unified opposition candidate, and ultimately defeated the long-standing ruler Yahya Jammeh. That victory was not the achievement of one party. It was the collective triumph of Gambians who rallied behind a coalition for democratic change.

However, history took a troubling turn after Darboe’s release from prison. He was appointed Foreign Minister and later Vice President. Yet instead of consolidating the spirit of coalition politics, unilateral decisions and confrontational rhetoric began to dominate the political atmosphere. Some supporters within the UDP started belittling President Barrow as an “accidental president,” claiming he owed his victory solely to Darboe and the UDP.

Such arguments ignore the central truth of coalition politics: no coalition victory belongs to one individual or one party.

Ironically, since distancing itself from the coalition framework, the UDP and Darboe forgot the fact that they have suffered four consecutive electoral defeats in the hands of Yahya Jammeh. The 2021 election results proved them wrong when Adama Barrow defeated Ousainou Darboe outrightly. This is not merely a political coincidence; it is a reminder that popularity within a party base or on the streets does not always translate into electoral victory.

The same lesson may be unfolding today in Senegal.

Ousmane Sonko, like Darboe in The Gambia, commands undeniable street popularity. His supporters are passionate, vocal, and emotionally invested in his political persona. But politics is not measured by street enthusiasm alone. Electoral success requires broad national alliances, institutional respect, and the humility to recognize the contributions of others.

This is precisely the point that Jallow makes about the Diomaye Coalition. When the political party structure collapsed and legal barriers threatened the candidacy of Diomaye, it was the coalition that carried the legal, financial, and organizational burden. The coalition mobilized voters across Senegal’s diverse political spectrum, ultimately securing the 54 percent mandate that brought Faye to power.

To attempt to erase that coalition and rewrite the story as a single-hero narrative is not only historically inaccurate; it is politically dangerous.

Even more troubling is the contradiction emerging in recent events. The same youth movements that once mobilized passionately in support of Sonko and the broader opposition struggle now find themselves confronting state security forces during protests at universities. Reports of police repression against young demonstrators raise difficult questions about whether revolutionary rhetoric has now given way to the harsh realities of governing.

Democratic politics cannot survive on antagonism, revenge, or emotional mobilization alone. Successful leadership requires restraint, maturity, and the ability to transform movements into institutions.

That is why President Faye’s metaphor about circumcision, as Jallow explains, should be understood not as a casual remark but as a cultural symbol of political maturity and responsibility. Leadership in Africa has always carried this deeper meaning: initiation into the burden of governing with discipline and restraint.

In this sense, Senegal now stands at a crossroads familiar to many African democracies.

Will its politics evolve toward coalition governance, institutional respect, and national unity?

Or will it descend into the same destructive cycle of personality cults, historical revisionism, and factional revenge that has destabilized many political movements after victory?

The Gambian experience offers a clear lesson: when pride replaces pragmatism, and when individuals attempt to rewrite collective victories as personal triumphs, political movements inevitably fracture.

Coalitions win elections.

Ego divides them.

Senegal would do well to remember this truth.

"From Banjul to Dakar: The Dangerous Illusion of Political “Alpha and Omega”

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator – Sweden

Alagi Yorro Jallow’s reflection comes at a moment when Senegal must carefully navigate the delicate balance between constitutional order and political personality. His central message is both clear and timeless: in a republic, no individual can claim to be the sole guardian of a political movement or the exclusive owner of a national mandate.

West African political history offers many lessons, and The Gambia provides a revealing example. For decades, lawyer Ousainou Darboe was widely regarded as the central figure of opposition politics and leader of the . Despite his prominence and persistence, the opposition under his leadership was unable to defeat the long-time ruler in four successive presidential elections.

During those years, numerous attempts were made to build a united opposition front in The Gambia. However, many of these coalition efforts struggled to gain traction. Political disagreements—particularly over who should serve as the coalition’s flagbearer—often stalled negotiations and prevented the opposition from presenting a single unified electoral strategy.

Ironically, circumstances eventually altered the political landscape. When Darboe was imprisoned in 2016 during protests against the Jammeh government, opposition parties intensified negotiations that ultimately produced a unified coalition. That coalition went on to defeat Jammeh in the historic *elections*, bringing *change* to the presidency and ending more than two decades of authoritarian rule.

Many Gambians interpret those events through different lenses—some politically, others spiritually—arguing that Darboe’s absence from the political arena at that critical moment created the conditions for unity among opposition parties determined to end Jammeh’s rule. Others, however, see the victory primarily as the product of growing public frustration, civil society mobilization, and an unprecedented willingness among opposition parties to compromise for the national interest.

A similar dynamic can be observed in Senegal. The legal challenges faced by opposition figure prevented him from contesting the presidency and dramatically reshaped the political contest. In his absence, his political ally emerged as the candidate who unified supporters and ultimately secured victory in the *presidential election*.

These developments highlight an important democratic lesson. Political movements often revolve around charismatic personalities, but electoral victories are rarely the product of one individual alone. They emerge from broader social movements, political alliances, and the collective will of citizens seeking change.

The experiences of both The Gambia and Senegal illustrate the dangers of elevating any political figure to the status of an “alpha and omega” of national politics. When leaders begin to view themselves as indispensable, they risk confusing popularity with ownership of a political movement—or even the state itself.

Democratic systems, however, are designed to function beyond individual personalities. Institutions, laws, and constitutional frameworks must ultimately remain stronger than any single leader, no matter how influential.

The Gambian experience demonstrates a simple but enduring truth: alliances evolve, movements mature, and institutions must outlast personalities. Senegal, like The Gambia before it, now faces the continuing challenge of strengthening democratic institutions while managing the powerful influence of political movements and personalities.

In the end, the stability of a republic depends not on heroic myths but on constitutional discipline, institutional strength, and the collective will of its citizens. The true guardian of any democratic state is not an individual leader, but the constitution that binds the nation together.

British and Gambian Wrestling Bodies Sign Cooperation Agreement in London

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

London, 6 March 2026 — The and the have signed a landmark Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at strengthening cooperation in the development of wrestling, youth empowerment, and cultural exchange between the two organisations.

The a

greement was signed in London by Craig Anthony of the British Wrestling Association and Matarr Saine of the Gambia Wrestling Association. The ceremony took place at the in the presence of , The Gambia’s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom.

Also in attendance was , International Relations representative for British Wrestling and a member of the .

The MoU establishes a knowledge partnership between the two federations, reflecting a shared commitment to promoting wrestling as both a competitive sport and a platform for cultural exchange, youth development, and social cohesion.

Officials from both organisations highlighted the importance of connecting different wrestling traditions. The agreement recognises the deep cultural heritage of Gambian traditional wrestling, locally known as Boreh, alongside the established development of Olympic-style wrestling in the United Kingdom. It also identifies beach wrestling as an emerging area of global interest where both federations see opportunities for collaboration.

Under the agreement, the two bodies will cooperate in several key areas, including technical and coaching exchanges. This will involve sharing expertise in Olympic wrestling styles, traditional Gambian wrestling techniques, and beach wrestling training methods.

The partnership will also promote cultural and fan engagement through the exchange of best practices in community participation, event organisation, and the promotion of wrestling at both grassroots and international levels.

Another important component of the agreement focuses on governance and integrity in sport. The federations plan to share safeguarding frameworks and consult on governance models that align with international sporting standards.

Youth development will form a central pillar of the cooperation. Planned initiatives include youth training camps, mentorship programmes, and projects designed to increase participation in wrestling, with a particular emphasis on improving gender inclusion within the sport.

The MoU further opens avenues for strategic advocacy and international cooperation, including exploring opportunities within global wrestling structures and seeking support from programmes such as Olympic Solidarity and Commonwealth sport development initiatives.

Speakers at the ceremony said the agreement reflects the strong spirit of friendship between the United Kingdom and The Gambia, and the belief that sport can serve as a bridge between cultures.

The Memorandum of Understanding is non-binding and does not impose financial obligations on either organisation. Each party will bear its own costs for activities carried out under the cooperation.

Signed in London on 6 March 2026, the agreement will remain in effect for two years, with the possibility of extension by mutual consent.

Staff of the Gambian diplomatic mission in London were also present at the signing ceremony.

Ends.

GRA’s Digital Transformation Delivers Record Revenue as C G Darboe Commends President Barrow’s Support

By JarraNews TV Staff Reporter

The Gambia Revenue Authority (GRA) has celebrated a landmark achievement in national revenue mobilization, announcing a historic collection of more than D25 billion in 2025, the highest in the institution’s history. The milestone reflects the remarkable success of the Authority’s modernization agenda under the leadership of Commissioner General Yankuba Darboe and the steadfast political support provided by the government of President Adama Barrow.

Speaking at the GRA headquarters in Banjul, Commissioner General Darboe attributed the record-breaking performance to the Authority’s bold digital transformation and the enabling policy environment created by President Barrow’s administration. He noted that the government’s unwavering commitment to reform has empowered the GRA to close long-standing loopholes, strengthen compliance, and significantly enhance the efficiency and transparency of tax administration.

According to Commissioner General Darboe, the Authority’s modernization drive has fundamentally reshaped the way revenue is collected in The Gambia. Through the introduction of electronic tax filing, online payment systems, and integrated digital platforms, the GRA has streamlined tax processes, minimized human error, and drastically reduced revenue leakages.

“These reforms have transformed our operations,” Darboe said. “With the continued support of His Excellency President Adama Barrow, the GRA has been able to modernize its systems and ensure that national revenue is collected more efficiently and transparently for the benefit of the Gambian people.”

The Commissioner General highlighted the dramatic progress made over the past decade. Around 2016, he explained, annual revenue collections averaged between D5 billion and D6 billion. Today, following years of reform and modernization, the Authority has surpassed D25.3 billion, representing a major leap in the country’s domestic resource mobilization.

Darboe emphasized that the GRA’s achievements are aligned with a broader national vision of economic self-reliance, where The Gambia increasingly funds its development priorities through domestically generated resources rather than external aid.

“The vision of every revenue authority is to help build a self-reliant nation,” he stated. “Meaningful development can only be achieved when we mobilize our own domestic revenue and support government in delivering infrastructure, social services, and economic growth. As a country, we can no longer rely solely on donors or external grants. Our reforms are helping The Gambia take greater ownership of its development.”

While commending the dedication and professionalism of GRA staff, the Commissioner General stressed that the Authority’s success would not have been possible without strong political will from the highest levels of government.

“Reforms are never easy,” he explained. “When reforms close leakages and strengthen systems, those who previously benefited from inefficiencies may resist change. That is why political backing is essential. In The Gambia, we are fortunate that the first champions of our reforms are His Excellency the President, the Cabinet, and the entire government.”

Observers note that the record revenue collection highlights the GRA’s growing role as a cornerstone of national development. With stronger systems, enhanced transparency, and sustained reforms, the Authority is now better positioned to support fiscal stability and fund key government programs.

Commissioner General Darboe reaffirmed the GRA’s commitment to deepening digitalization, strengthening institutional integrity, and maintaining transparency in revenue administration. He also emphasized that continued collaboration between the Authority and the government will remain critical in sustaining progress.

“The secret behind the success of the Gambia Revenue Authority is clear,” Darboe concluded. “When reforms are properly explained and supported at the highest level, implementation becomes easier and results follow. With the strong political support we enjoy, we will continue strengthening our systems and contributing meaningfully to The Gambia’s development.”

As the GRA celebrates this historic achievement, the Authority’s performance stands as a powerful testament to the impact of visionary leadership, digital innovation, and firm political support in building a stronger and more resilient Gambian economy.

Tri-vergence or Turmoil? Opposition’s “Harmony Pact” Sparks Questions Ahead of December Showdown

By Yaya Dampha NPP Diaspora Coordinator, Sweden

The recent announcement by six opposition parties in The Gambia that they have signed what they call a “Harmony Pact” under the banner of the Tri-vergence Accord has been presented as a step toward unity ahead of the December 5 presidential election. However, beneath the appealing language of cooperation and good faith lies a number of serious political questions.

At its core, the accord is described as a voluntary and non-binding moral commitment designed to reduce hostility and mistrust among rival camps. Yet the very need for such a pact exposes the deep divisions within the opposition. If genuine trust and shared purpose already existed, there would be no requirement for a formal agreement instructing members and supporters to avoid inflammatory rhetoric.

The pact does not resolve the central issue confronting the opposition: leadership. Multiple presidential aspirants remain in competition, each seeking to secure the coalition ticket. Ambition, ego, and political survival are powerful forces. Without a clear and agreed leadership structure, declarations of harmony risk being symbolic rather than substantive.

Furthermore, the agreement calls on party members and supporters to refrain from incitement and public hostility. However, much of the antagonism in Gambian politics occurs online and at the grassroots level. If party executives truly exercise discipline and command loyalty within their ranks, such hostilities would already be under control. The gap between official pronouncements and the behavior of supporters raises legitimate doubts about enforcement and sincerity.

Another point worth noting is that the pact is not legally binding. It carries no enforceable consequences should any party withdraw or violate its spirit. In a political environment where alliances shift quickly, a moral commitment without institutional safeguards provides little assurance of stability.

While opposition figures continue to criticize the government, they have yet to convincingly articulate a unified alternative program that inspires broad national confidence. Persistent attacks, without a clear and cohesive policy vision, may signal frustration more than readiness to govern.

In contrast, supporters of the remain confident in the record of development and governance delivered to the Gambian people. Elections are ultimately decided not by press statements or symbolic accords, but by credibility, performance, and trust.

The so-called Tri-vergence Accord may represent an attempt at damage control or internal confidence-building. However, unity must be demonstrated through action, clarity of leadership, and consistent messaging—not merely through carefully crafted communiqués.

As the campaign season approaches, Gambians will be watching closely. Whether this pact marks the beginning of genuine convergence or merely reflects coordinated confusion remains to be seen.

Customs Seaport Lauds Excellence as Three Officers Attain New Heights

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

In a powerful display of institutional pride and professional advancement, the Customs Seaport on Monday, 2 March 2026, hosted a dignified decoration ceremony celebrating the promotion of three outstanding officers—an event that underscored the Service’s unwavering commitment to excellence, discipline, and national service.

The ceremony, held at the Seaport Longroom, was led by the indefatigable Seaport Customs Manager, , whose leadership continues to inspire confidence and progress within the ranks. Addressing officers and guests, Mr. Mendy extended heartfelt appreciation to (GRA) Management for fostering an enabling environment that rewards merit, dedication, and professionalism across the Customs Service.

At the height of the ceremony, senior officer Njunka Njie received the highest promotion, personally decorated by the Customs Manager himself—a moment greeted with resounding applause. This was followed by the decoration of Aminta Jarjue (Sub-Officer II) by Senior Officer Foday Drammeh. In a proud testament to the institution’s steadfast commitment to gender balance and inclusion, Roheyatou Minteh (Sub-Officer III) was decorated by Binta Jammeh, symbolizing empowerment and equal opportunity within the Service.

In his closing remarks, Manager Mendy reaffirmed Management’s deep awareness of the Seaport’s strategic importance in the national revenue drive. He paid glowing tribute to the tireless sacrifices of officers who diligently serve long hours—from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.—to safeguard national economic interests.

Invoking a timeless principle of public service, he charged all officers to uphold integrity and excellence at all times, reminding them that, “To whom much is given, much is expected.” He urged continued commitment to doing the right thing—whether under supervision or not—thereby reinforcing the noble values that define the Customs Service.

The ceremony ended on a high note, leaving officers energized and reaffirmed in their duty to serve the nation with honor, loyalty, and professionalism.

Drug Smuggler Arrested at Mile 2 Prison

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter
Dated: 27 February 2026

In an act authorities have described as reckless and unlawful, a young man allegedly attempted to smuggle illicit drugs into Mile 2 Central Prison under the pretext of delivering food items to a friend.

Prison authorities confirmed that the suspect, identified as , a resident of Abuko, was arrested on Friday, 27 February 2026, while visiting the prison to deliver provisions to a remand prisoner.

According to officials, routine security screening carried out by prison officers led to the discovery of approximately twenty-two (22) wraps of a suspected prohibited substance locally known as “coos.” The substance was allegedly concealed inside packets of noodles and was detected during standard inspection procedures.

Mr. Amadou Tijan Sowe was immediately taken into custody and subsequently handed over to the (DLEAG) for further investigation. Authorities said he is expected to be charged in accordance with the country’s drug control laws.

The Prison Authorities, working in close collaboration with DLEAG, reiterated their firm commitment to combating drug trafficking and maintaining security and order within all correctional facilities nationwide. They cautioned that any attempt to smuggle prohibited items into prisons constitutes a serious criminal offence and will be met with the full force of the law.

Members of the public have been urged to cooperate with law enforcement agencies in the ongoing fight against illegal drug trafficking and other criminal activities.