The United Democratic Party (UDP), once the unshakable fortress of opposition politics in The Gambia, now stands on trembling ground. The party that once marched in unison behind a single yellow banner is today fragmented, uncertain, and dangerously distracted by internal rivalries and leadership fatigue. As the 2026 presidential election approaches, one thing becomes increasingly clear: UDP cannot unseat President Adama Barrow — not in this current political climate, and not with this fractured house.
1. A Party Bleeding from Within
The UDP’s latest crisis — the mass defection of nearly half its executive to Talib Ahmed Bensouda’s new movement — marks more than just a personnel change. It represents a symbolic collapse of internal confidence. Talib Bensouda, once seen as the UDP’s future, now embodies its disillusionment. His departure didn’t just drain talent; it drained credibility, youth energy, and national appeal from the party’s core.
In Gambian politics, perception is power. And today, the perception is clear: UDP is no longer the party of progress but the party of nostalgia — still echoing past slogans while others write new political scripts.
2. Leadership Fatigue and the Darboe Dilemma
Ousainou Darboe’s long leadership has given UDP both legacy and limits. After decades of faithful service, the question now is not whether Darboe can lead, but whether he still inspires. Political generations have shifted. Gambians under 35 — who make up the majority of the electorate — speak the language of digital politics, jobs, and modern reform, not the rhetoric of resistance.
While Barrow positions himself as the “builder of continuity” and Talib Bensouda crafts himself as “the youthful alternative,” UDP remains caught in the middle — too old to be revolutionary, too divided to be reformist.
3. Vacancies that Reveal a Void
The UDP’s published list of vacant national positions reads less like a sign of renewal and more like an obituary of lost unity.
When a party struggles to fill positions like National Organising Secretary and National Campaign Manager — the very engines of electoral mobilization — it signals disorganization at the heart of the machine. A party preparing to take State House should be refining its message, not replacing its messengers.
The sheer volume of applicants competing for posts once occupied by seasoned loyalists shows desperation, not discipline. Unity has given way to opportunism, and ambition has replaced cohesion.
4. The Politics of Intimidation vs. The Politics of Discipline
The UDP’s approach to political opponents — insults, intimidation tactics, and the so-called “Foroyaa kanta” — has proven counterproductive. Instead of building bridges, it burns them. Instead of persuasion, it breeds resentment.
Every day, some UDP supporters flood the public space with personal attacks and insults, even cursing people’s parents, merely because they support a different party. That kind of politics alienates neutral voters and disgusts the moderate middle — the very constituency that decides elections in The Gambia.
In contrast, President Adama Barrow’s leniency, discipline, and soft approach have been a quiet but effective political weapon. The NPP’s grassroots strategy — selling the party’s vision without insults, without intimidation, and with respect for all Gambians — is reshaping the tone of Gambian politics. Barrow’s calm temperament and tolerance have become an asset, turning criticism into credibility and anger into admiration.
This contrast between UDP’s aggression and NPP’s composure is one of the most decisive psychological factors that will shape the 2026 vote.
5. President Barrow’s Strategic Advantage
Meanwhile, President Adama Barrow stands stronger than ever. With state machinery, a loyal rural base, and cross-party coalitions quietly solidifying, Barrow represents stability in a sea of fragmentation. He has successfully repositioned himself from “UDP’s accidental president” to “The Gambia’s pragmatic leader.”
Barrow’s political maturity now lies in absorbing disaffected figures from both UDP and the opposition fringes, further expanding his reach. The defections from UDP into Bensouda’s camp — and eventually into Barrow’s orbit — only strengthen the incumbent’s long game.
6. The Riddle of UDP’s Future
Riddle:
What is a lion without its roar,
A tree whose roots have gone to war,
A flag whose color fades with dawn,
Yet still believes the sun will rise at morn?
The answer is the UDP — still proud, still standing, yet quietly bleeding beneath the golden cloth.
Unless the party can rebuild its structure, empower a younger and united leadership, and redefine its message beyond “Darboe versus Barrow,” it risks becoming the eternal opposition — a party respected for its history, but irrelevant to the future.
Conclusion
UDP’s strength once lay in its unity, discipline, and moral conviction. Today, those very pillars are fractured. The party’s toxic communication culture, leadership fatigue, and internal defections are eroding its electoral base.
President Barrow, seasoned and strategic, will walk into 2026 facing a divided UDP, a splintered opposition, and a strengthened incumbency machine. His soft-spoken leadership, message of tolerance, and disciplined team have become the new model of political persuasion.
Unless UDP urgently reinvents itself, the 2026 elections will not be a contest — they will be a coronation of continuity.
No comments:
Post a Comment