Hit And Run Driver Arrested By Soldiers

Following the tragidic killing of over half a dozen of children in Jarunehkoto CRR South by a hit and run truck driver two days ago the personals of the Gambia armed Forces stationed at Lamin koto military camp apprehended the driver. The driver who was later identified as Yuspha Bojang is said to resident of Kombo Brikama but a citisen of Southern Senegal Casamance. According to sources from military police the Personnel of the Gambia Armed Forces Laminkoto Military Camp on Saturday 10 December 2023 apprehended a truck driver who ran over a jubilant crowd killing 7 on the spot. The rest were rushed to the hospital where another person was declared dead on Sunday 11 December 2023. The crowd were celebrating a football victory.

The Laminkoto Military Camp was informed about a hit-and-run incident at Jarumeh Koto between the hours of 10:00 pm and 11:00 pm involving a truck driver who ran into a jubilant crowd crushing over a dozen people, killing 7 on the spot leaving some critically injured. Laminkoto Military Camp immediately dispatched a patrol team. The driver been aware of the presence of the military diverted towards Kerr Nyaga, Nyamina District, CRR North going towards Senegal. He hid the vehicle in a nearby bush and went hiding in the bush. The patrol team discovered the truck and took it to the Laminkoto Military Camp and then continued on the hot pursuit. The driver noticing that the team was getting closer, he ran to the Firdausi Police Station in Firdausi in Niani CRR North to avoid being arrested by the soldiers.

The patrol team led by the Officer Commanding, Laminkoto Military Camp, Major Malick Boye took him from there and hand him over to the Deputy Police Commissioner CRR, Juldeh Camara at the Jamjanbureh Police Station. Driver is helping the police in establishing facts surrounding the unfortunate and tragic incident.

Defense Lawyer “Kumba Killed Lamarana In Self Defense”

Defense Counsel Suggested Kumba Killed Lamarana Jallow (Lama) Out of Self-Defense The defense lawyer, Sagarr, cross-examined the state's ninth witness, Momodou Touray, in the murder case involving Kumba Sinyan. Sinyan was charged with the murder of her boyfriend, Lamarana Jallow, by cutting his stomach with a razor blade, causing his death. Counsel Sagarr began by asking Touray, the witness, about his rank in the police force. Touray stated that he is the Chief Inspector at the Special Crime Unit in Bakau. Sagarr then inquired about Touray's whereabouts at the time of the incident, to which Touray responded that he was in Bakau, working as the Officer in Charge of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).

He testified that he was the lead investigator in the case, responsible for investigating the allegations and compiling a report for potential prosecution. He clarified that he supervised a team of officers, with Crime Scene Officer Samba Bah being one of them, and others provided assistance as needed. Counsel Sagarr proceeded to ask Touray if he had given a statement regarding the matter, to which Touray confirmed that he had. When asked if he had the original copy of the statement, Touray mentioned that it had been filed. Sagarr then asked Touray to verify whether the statement was his and when shown to him, to which Touray confirmed it was his statement and handwriting. Sagarr then expressed the intention to tender the witness statement as evidence, and the prosecution raised no objections. The presiding Judge marked and admitted the statement as a defense exhibit.

Continuing the cross-examination, Counsel Sagarr asked Touray about the first meeting between the witness and the accused. Touray stated that they met at the Bakau Police Station on September 14, 2022, early in the morning before 8 am. Touray mentioned that other police officers, including Mariama Sowe, were present during that meeting. He clarified that he was not the Police Public Relations Officer (PRO) at that time, as that role was held by Binta Njie. Senior Counsel Sagarr then inquired about when Njie became involved in the case. Touray simply responded that he could remember that. The defense questioned Touray about his previous statement regarding his claim that the investigation would continue, Touray stated that he did not recall making that statement. The court reviewed the case file and found that Touray had indeed stated that the investigation would continue after returning to the station. The defense then asked Touray about the evidence collected during the investigation and to whom it was sent. Touray mentioned that the investigative results were sent to the Ministry of Justice. When asked for a copy of the evidence, Touray explained that it would either be with the ministry or stored in the files. Sagarr proceeded to ask Touray about when the accused was officially charged with murder. Touray stated that he did not know the time but the information would be in the records. Sagarr then inquired about who determined the charges. Touray responded that he and one of his Junior. The defense brought up his (Touray) previous statement, where he mentioned that the accused (Kumba) had confessed to him committing the murder. However, Touray claimed not to remember the date. When pressed about where the confession took place, Touray mentioned that it occurred at the Kairaba police station, with himself, Officer Bah, Mariama, and station personnel present. He confirmed that a cautionary statement was obtained from the accused, and in that statement, she admitted to killing the victim. However, when shown the cautionary statement, Touray stated that he did not author it and could not tell whether the confession was recorded. Sagarr Further questions whether he (Touray) questioned the accused about self-defense. He stated that she mentioned self-defense but did not provide further details. Sagarr inquired if the investigation delved deeper into what she meant by self-defense, to which Touray replied that she had only mentioned cutting a wound on her hand but said she cut the stomach of Lama with a razor blade. Sagarr then asked if Touray knew if the accused had been taken to the hospital for further examination. Touray responded negatively. Counsel Sagarr put to the witness that the accused had a cut on her hand, but Touray clarified that it was a small cut and confirmed that she had shown it to him. When asked if further examination was conducted on her injuries, Touray stated that he did not examine her further, because Kumb only discussed the wound on her hand. Sagarr then asked Touray if they had taken the accused to the hospital for an examination, to which he replied that they had not. Counsel Sagarr questioned Touray about his familiarity with taking statements and how he supervised the process. Touray confirmed his familiarity and expressed satisfaction with his supervision. When asked if the accused's lawyer was present during the statement-taking, Touray mentioned that the family and a lawyer were present. Sagarr asked the witness whether a lawyer was present but Kumba's lawyer, the witness negatively. Senior Counsel Sagarr emphasized the importance of a lawyer being present as a constitutional right, which Touray acknowledged. Sagarr then inquired if an independent witness was provided during the statement-taking, to which Touray answered affirmatively. However, he clarified that it was not him who provided the witness, but rather there was an independent witness present. Senior Counsel Sagarr raised a question about the timing of the independent witness, suggesting that they were brought up after the statement was taken. Touray disagreed, stating that it occurred before. The defense then claimed that the accused was not cautioned properly, but Touray insisted that she was. Sagarr challenged Touray's knowledge about the legal distinction between killings and murder saying not all killing implies murder, to which Touray admitted he did not know. Sagarr told the Toura witness, that PW7 didn't testify that Kumba confessed to the killing, Touray pointed out that he was PW9 and not PW7. Counsel Sagarr argued that the accused's confession of self-defense does not necessarily imply murder in the particular circumstance. The judge intervened, indicating that it would be up to the court to determine. Counsel Sagarr then asked Touray to review a document referred to as Exhibit G and determine its content. However, the state counsel objected, stating that Touray previously stated he did not make the statement, so he should not be questioned about it. Counsel Sagarr clarified that he was challenging the claim of the confession being present in the voluntary statement. Touray stated that he did not know but reiterated that the accused confessed to killing her boyfriend with a razor blade. The defense further questioned Touray about whether he took pictures of the victim, to which he confirmed that he did. However, he stated that the pictures were with the crime scene officer. Sagarr asked Touray if he was familiar with the case, to which Touray replied affirmatively. When asked when the case file was transferred to him, Touray mentioned that it was on September 14, 2022. Sagarr inquired about Touray's visit to the crime scene, to which Touray confirmed that he had visited on the same day in the morning. Counsel Sagarr asked if Touray was present when the accused person was visited at her house, to which Touray replied affirmatively. However, when asked if he was present during the first visit to the crime scene for evidence collection, Touray stated that he was not there. Counsel Sagarr questioned whether Touray attended the evidence collection, to which Touray responded negatively. At this point, Counsel Sagarr stated that she had no further questions for Touray, and the witness was discharged. The state counsel promised to call the last state witness and the case was adjourned to Wednesday at 13:00. Source Kexx Sanneh

President Barrow visits Ongoing Projects

On Saturday, President Adama Barrow went on a monitoring visit to several development projects to enhance access to electricity, provision of modern health care services and training of the youthful population in need of skills in engineering and technology.

With a clear NDP dubbed "Yiriwa Programme", the future of The Gambia is brighter. The journey is faster with an extra 23 megawatts of Solar-generated energy from the Jamburr Plant, the construction of a 1500-bed National Emergency Treatment Centre at Farato and the USET Campus in motion.

In short, by building a brighter social and environmentally friendly nation for economic development, with a modern health decentralised facility and skilled citizens, the country's advancement would be at another level. At a Joint meeting held at Brikama, President Barrow listed several areas of the NDP "Yiriwa" Programme. They are providing Universal Access to Electricity between 2023- 2027, having a New Port, expanding the current one and creating dry ports in the provinces to revitalise River Transportation. The port project is possible with the Compact grant the MCC awarded to The Gambia during the progress made in nurturing democracy in the country.

Other vital areas of the NDP "Yiriwa" Programme include communities' Access to clean drinking water, rolling out governance and Digital economy, which promotes non-cash financial transactions, including the digitalisation of public transportation fares. The Yiriwa Programme will also drastically promote Agricultural rice production and cut. importation

To expand facilities for the tourism sector, the Yiriwa Programme includes the expansion of the airport and the building of new hotels. Addressing developments in Brikama, President Barrow assured the audience that the community elders had identified a location for the government to construct a new hospital. He thanked them for the gesture.

In relation to the clearing of the street with illegal squatters, President Barrow said national development for the greater good takes priority over the individual interest. He told the women at the Brikama meeting that he understood their situation. However, with support from the World Bank, a new hospital would be constructed in Brikama, and the one adjacent to the market would be transformed into a market, providing more space for women.

He reminded them that the stone he laid for constructing a modern market with about 1200 stalls was geared towards organising the market area. President Barrow also used the opportunity to call on the Brikama Area Council to work with the Central Government to benefit the people in the region, stressing, "People can't just do whatever they want. They must respect the laws of the country". He urged the Brikam Area Council to keep the town and its environment clean.

The Meet the People's tour continues in the Busumbaa Constituency on Sunday evening.

Battle of Credibility in Court As Aisha Fatty…….

By Kexx Sanneh Aisha Fatty Opposed Aji Fama's Testimony: A Battle of Credibility in the Courtroom Aisha Fatty opposes the motion to summon her former friend, Aji Fama Taal-Gaye, to testify in the lawsuit filed against her by Abdoulaye Thiam, her ex. Aisha Fatty questions the credibility of Aji Fama's testimony and raises doubts about her motives for wanting to testify. During the previous hearing, counsel Lamin Ceesay informed the court that Abdoulaye Thiam had filed a Notice of Motion to seek an order for Aji Fama Taal-Gaye to testify in the lawsuit. The motion, filed under Order XXIII (7) of the High Court (Amendment Rules) 2013, highlights Aji Fama's importance as a witness and her possession of relevant information regarding the case.

According to the affidavit, Aji Fama Taal-Gaye, a legal practitioner and a friend of Aisha Fatty, is believed to have pertinent information about the case. It is alleged that Aji Fama purchased some disputed gold from Aisha Fatty and still possesses it. The affidavit emphasizes the necessity and significance of Aji Fama's testimony in resolving the issues at hand, stating that summoning her would serve the interests of justice. In her opposing affidavit, Aisha Fatty asserts that as the first defendant/respondent, she knows the facts related to the case. While she does not deny or admit certain paragraphs of the affidavit due to her limited knowledge, she either admits or denies others, stressing that the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. The affidavit challenges the credibility of Aji Fama Taal-Gaye's testimony by highlighting the strained relationship between Aisha Fatty and Aji Fama. It states that their relationship deteriorated months before the case was filed, suggesting that Aji Fama's motive for testifying is purely personal. Furthermore, Aisha Fatty denies her involvement in the gold business and claims that she only sold her personal gold chain and earrings to Aji Fama upon repeated requests for her naming ceremony. She questions Aji Fama's knowledge of the origin of the gold and suggests that personal issues may have influenced her judgment. Aisha Fatty argues that Aji Fama's testimony would not contribute to resolving the issues due to their severed relationship and raises concerns about potential bias on Aji Fama's part. The affidavit also points out that the application lacks validity as the summons mentioned in the motion has not been attached to the application served on Aisha Fatty's counsel. Aisha Fatty and her counsel contend that granting the application to summon Aji Fama Taal-Gaye would be against the interests of justice. They argue that the application lacks merit as it fails to include the proposed Affidavit of Witness Statement by Aji Fama. Granting the application, they believe, would cause significant prejudice to Aisha Fatty's case. To summarize, Aisha Fatty's opposing affidavit challenges the claims made by Abdoulaye Cham (the plaintiff) regarding the testimony of Aji Fama Taal-Gaye. It aims to establish the lack of credibility and potential bias in Aji Fama's involvement as a witness in the case. Now, the court will consider the arguments presented to determine whether or not to allow Aji Fama to testify.

Former Jungler Bai Lowe Sentenced To Life In Prison

Bai Lowe, one of the assassins in the Jammeh-era hit squad known as the ‘Junglers', has today been sentenced to life imprisonment by a German court for his participation in an act that killed Deyda Hydara, the managing editor and co-proprietor of The Point Newspaper. He was convicted of crimes against humanity, murder, and attempted murder for his role as a driver for the hit squad known as the Junglers. “We are pleased to welcome the strongest verdict in Celle today," said Baba Hydara,the eldest son of Deyda Hydara . “This is a milestone judgment on every level, especially with regards to universal jurisdiction. We thank the judiciary for their tenacity and steadfastness in delivering justice today," Baba who is in Germany, added. As well as having a role in Hydara’s killing, prosecutors accuse Lowe of involvement in the attempted assassination of lawyer Ousman Sillah, and the murder of Dawda Nyassi, a suspected opponent of the president. Lowe claimed to be a political refugee who was afraid for his life under Jammeh when he came in Europe via Senegal in December 2012. In March 2021, he was arrested in Germany due to the charges. The law’s “long arm”

According to investigators, one piece of evidence against Lowe is a phone conversation he did in 2013 with a Gambian radio station in the US, during which he admitted to taking part in the attacks. However, Lowe said in a statement read out to the court that he had only reiterated what other persons had informed him regarding the case’s details in order to highlight Jammeh’s government’s brutality. Jammeh ruled Gambia with an iron fist for 22 years but fled the country in January 2017 after losing a presidential election to relative unknown Adama Barrow. He refused to acknowledge the results but was forced out by a popular uprising and fled to Equatorial Guinea. “The long arm of the law has caught up to Bai Lowe in Germany… as it will hopefully soon catch up to Jammeh himself,” said Reed Brody, a lawyer with the International Commission of Jurists who works with Jammeh’s victims. Along with former interior minister Ousman Sonko, who has been under investigation in Switzerland since 2017, and another accused former Jungler, Michael Sang Correa, who was indicted in June 2020 in the United States, Lowe is one of three alleged collaborators of Jammeh who are being held abroad. Earlier this year, the Gambian administration said that it was collaborating with the regional ECOWAS bloc to establish a tribunal that would try individuals who committed crimes under Jammeh.

The Victims' Centre (VC) in The Gambia has also welcomed the verdict. “The VC, CSOs, and other victim-led organisations welcome the verdict of Bai Lowe's life sentence.It is highly welcome and has come at the right time,” Adama Jalllow, the coordinator of VC said. “This is a signal for other perpetrators who are on the run to understand that they cannot escape justice." The VC and other victim-led organisations will continue to pursue justice for the victims.”

Mama Jabbi`s Phone Printouts Tendered In Court

The trial of Ousainou Bojang and sister proceeded before justice Jaiteh of the High court in Banjul. It could be recall that PW3 Mama Jabbi was still in the witness box facing defence lawer Lamin J Darboe for cross examination after her maraton testimony. During the last sitting Lawyer L J Darboe have applied for court to ask the GSM companies to produce the call printouts of the witness before the court. Ousainou Bojang who is accused of Killing the two officers and injuring one while the sister helped him to escape the Jurisdiction. During the last adjournment, Counsel J. Darboe requested the production of Mama Jabbi's call records from Africell and Qcell, which was granted by the Court. The Africell call records were tendered as Exhibit C1, and a data analyst from Africell named Abubacarr Jallow brought the documents to the court. Counsel J. Darboe and Faraje confirmed the authenticity of the documents without objection. However, the state counsel, the Director of Public Prosecution, objected to the document, citing the Evidence Act's Section 22 regarding the admissibility of computer-generated documents. The Presiding Judge, Jaiteh, overruled the objection, stating that the computer's calculations were advanced and the information provided was accurate. Counsel J. Darboe proceeded with the cross-examination, starting from the previous proceeding on November 28th, 2023.

He asked Mama Jabbi if she had made a statement with the police regarding the matter, to which she replied affirmatively, stating that she made the statement at the anti-crime unit. When asked about the timing of the statement, Mama Jabbi mentioned that she couldn't recall the exact date. Similarly, she couldn't remember how many days after her return from Jululung to The Gambia she had made the statement. She confirmed that she had provided her name as Mama Jabbie, her address as Sukuta, and her occupation as a housewife when asked by Counsel J. Darboe. She also confirmed providing two telephone numbers: 7837790 and 3829711. Mama Jabbi explained that she had removed the SIM cards due to receiving insults from people. Counsel J. Darboe inquired about Mama Jabbi's age 36 as she provided in her statement, to which she responded that she may have said that age but couldn't remember. He (Counsel J.

Darboe) further asked if she thumbprint the statement after it was taken, to which she answered affirmatively, adding after thumbprint she left the statement with the police, and Counsel J. Darboe applied to tender the statement as defence Exhibit, with no objection from the state counsel or the second defence counsel. The statement was marked and admitted as Exhibit D3. Counsel J. Darboe then asked Mama Jabbi about her claim that the accused met her at 2 pm in Jululung and she had taken a picture of him (Ousainou Bojang). Mama Jabbi confirmed both, stating that she had taken a picture of Ousainou Bojang. She further revealed that she had recorded her conversation with him, but she left the room and made a call when Ousaious Bojang allegedly confessed to killing someone. Counsel J. Darboe asked if she had the audio recording with her, and Mama Jabbi explained that she had deleted her WhatsApp due to receiving insults, so she no longer had the recording unless it was with someone else. Counsel J. Darboe asserted that the audio was circulating on the internet, but Mama Jabbi replied that she wasn't aware if that was the case. The cross-examination continued with questions about a police officer who called Mama Jabbi from The Gambia when Musa relayed her information about apprehending the accused in Jululung. Mama Jabbi clarified that she called Musa herself and no Gambia police officer contacted her. Counsel J. Darboe then inquired about when the accused had asked to use her phone as alleged by Mama in her statement, to which Mama Jabbi explained that it was after he (Ousainou Bojang) confessed to killing someone and then requested to call his sister.

The cross-examination proceeded with questions about Musa Camara's marital status, to which Mama Jabbi confirmed that he was married. Counsel J. Darboe referred to a previous statement where Mama Jabbi had mentioned meeting Musa only once at the GRA, to which the state counsel objected, requesting a direct quote instead of paraphrasing. The Court expunged the question from the record. Counsel J. Darboe asked how many times Mama Jabbi had met Musa within the last six months. She answered that she had only met him on the day they went to Jululung together to apprehend the accused and give a statement at the anti-crime unit. Counsel J. Darboe questioned whether Mama Jabbi had called Musa's wife before calling Musa himself. Mama Jabbi clarified that she called Musa's wife's number, and Musa picked up the call, as they were in communication throughout their time in Jululung. When asked if she knew Musa's wife personally, she confirmed that she did. The cross-examination then focused on the timeline of Mama Jabbi's presence in The Gambia and her whereabouts and actions during certain dates in August and September 2023. Counsel J. Darboe brings up the statement made by Mama Jabbi to the police in the defense exhibit D3. The counsel asks if Mama Jabbi stated that she left Gambia and went to Dakar on August 12th, 2023. Mama Jabbi confirms by saying that she left Dakar on Tuesday and arrived at Jululung at 2 am. Counsel J. Darboe then questions Mama Jabbi regarding her entire month-long absence from Gambia Mama Jabbi responds that she cannot remember. Counsel refers to exhibit C1, which consists of call records from August 17th to August 25th, 2023. According to the records, Mama Jabbi was in Gambia and did not go anywhere during that time. However, Mama Jabbi denies this and states that she doesn't recall. Continuing the cross-examination, Counsel J. Darboe mentions that Mama Jabbi crossed the border at Basori on September 10th, 2023, to reach Jululung. The counsel points out that Mama Jabbi disappeared for two days and reappeared in Senegal on September 12th. Mama Jabbi responds by dismissing this as the counsel's opinion and says that she doesn't know.

Counsel J. Darboe clarifies that it is not his opinion but is based on exhibit C1, which shows that Mama Jabbi was at Basori at 4 minutes to 5. However, Mama Jabbi again states that she cannot remember. Counsel Darboe then asserts that Mama Jabbi did not make any calls in Gambia on September 11th and 12th because she was not in Gambia. Mama Jabbi sticks to her previous response, stating that she cannot remember. Moving on, Counsel J. Darboe asks Mama Jabbi if she went to Brufut on September 13th when the accused person was apprehended and brought back to Gambia. Mama Jabbi confirms this and explains that she was with the police in Brufut after coming from Jululung. Senior Counsel then put to her that at 9:22 pm on September 13th, she (Mama Jabbi) was at Brufut junction, which is the workplace and home of the accused person. Mama Jabbi denies this by saying that she didn't go there. Counsel J. Darboe refers to exhibit C1 again, which indicates that Mama Jabbi's call records show her being at Brufut junction on September 13th at 9:22 pm. Mama Jabbi insists that it is not her. Counsel J. Darboe further asserts that Mama Jabbi did not go home to Sukuta but instead went to old Yundum after Brufut. Mama Jabbi denies this as well, stating that it is not her. Counsel J. Darboe refers to the call records once again, indicating that Mama Jabbi was at Old Yundum at 11:28 pm on September 13th when the first accused person was apprehended. Mama Jabbi reiterates that she cannot recall that information. Counsel J. Darboe informs Mama Jabbi that she spent the night at Old Yundum from September 13th to 14th. Mama Jabbi explains that she stayed there because people were insulting her online, preventing her from returning to her home at Sukuta. Continuing the cross-examination, Counsel J. Darboe questions Mama Jabbi about the telephone number 3829711. He asks if this number is registered under her name. Mama Jabbi clarified that she only uses it for WhatsApp and that the number was given to someone else. Counsel J. Darboe put to her that the telephone is registered under Musa Camara's name, not Mama Jabbi's. Mama Jabbi responds by saying that she knew it as her Qcel number for WhatsApp, not Musa's number. Counsel J. Darboe referred the count to Mama Jabbi's statement to the police, where she allegedly identified 3829711 as her telephone number. Mama Jabbi states that she doesn't remember and didn't memorize the number. At this point the Court adjourned the case to December 4th for continuatioon.