Tunkara Refutes Sanyang’s Remarks on April 14 Protest

Lamin A. Tunkara has strongly refuted recent comments made by Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang during an interview with West Coast Radio, describing them as “egregious, reckless, and a deliberate distortion of facts.” Mr. Tunkara said the remarks falsely implicated him in the events of April 14, 2016, when Gambians staged a peaceful demonstration demanding electoral reform and addressing the Senegalo-Gambia border impasse.

“The protest involved citizens—including my own brothers—who were exercising their constitutional rights in a peaceful and democratic manner,” Tunkara stated. “To suggest that I played any role in instigating harm is not only false but an insult to the sacrifices of those who stood for justice.” He emphasized that his role at the time, like that of many others, was solely focused on uniting Gambians in the pursuit of democratic change. “My involvement in national affairs has always been guided by principles of justice, fairness, and transparency,” he noted. Tunkara further accused Mr. Sanyang of politicizing a sensitive moment in the country’s history. “Unlike Mr. Sanyang, I have always stood for the values that underpin a free and democratic society,” he said. Reflecting on the events of 2016, he expressed pride in his contribution, alongside thousands of Gambians and international partners, who acted “out of conviction and ism.” He added: “Some paid a heavier price than others, but all did so in the service of The Gambia.” Now serving in government, Tunkara reaffirmed his commitment to the country’s leadership and development. He urged Sanyang to exercise “greater caution and responsibility” in his public statements, warning against “using subterfuge to court relevance.” “As a nation, we must move forward not by tearing each other down, but by building on the sacrifices, hard work, and progress that brought us this far,” Tunkara concluded.

Bajo’s Leadership Steers Gambian Football to Historic Heights Amid Unfounded Criticism

By JarraNews Staff Writer

In the face of misinformed online chatter and unfounded accusations, the leadership of Retired Captain Lamin Kaba Bajo has proven to be one of the strongest pillars of Gambian football’s rise in recent years. Contrary to claims by detractors who attempt to link him with delays in the Independence Stadium renovations, facts show that Bajo and his executive team at the Gambia Football Federation (GFF) have been focused on building institutions, strengthening grassroots structures, and raising the international profile of Gambian football. Setting the Record Straight on Stadium Renovations

It is worth clarifying that the Ministry of Youth and Sports—working with the central government—is solely responsible for the rehabilitation of the Independence Stadium in Bakau. The protracted work, though delayed, has now been completed and certified by CAF and FIFA, restoring the facility to international standards. The GFF, under Bajo’s stewardship, had no control over the stadium reconstruction process. In fact, Gambia was not alone in suffering the inconvenience of moving home matches abroad while renovation work was ongoing. Many African nations, from Sierra Leone to Liberia, have also endured similar displacements due to CAF bans on substandard venues. Gambia itself hosted “home” matches in Morocco against Seychelles and in Franceville, Gabon against the Panthers during this period—decisions compelled by CAF, not the GFF. Achievements Under Bajo’s Watch While critics spread half-truths online, Bajo’s record speaks volumes. Under his leadership, Gambian football has reached milestones once thought unimaginable: Senior National Team Breakthrough: The Scorpions qualified for their first-ever Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in 2021, advancing all the way to the quarter-finals. They followed this with a second consecutive AFCON appearance in 2023—proof of consistency, not chance. Youth Football Excellence: The Young Scorpions, Gambia’s U-20 side, became WAFU Zone A Champions in 2018 and 2020, while finishing as runners-up in the 2023 Africa U-20 Cup of Nations and securing multiple bronze medals in earlier editions. Women’s Football Growth: Through FIFA-backed “Live Your Goals” initiatives and inter-school competitions, more than 2,200 Gambian girls have been introduced to the game. Regular U-15 jamborees and U-17 pathways have been established to nurture future stars. Leadership That Builds Institutions Captain Lamin Kaba Bajo’s leadership has been marked not by empty rhetoric but by visionary planning and institution-building. The structures he and his executive have put in place—from grassroots football to elite national squads—are laying a foundation that will serve Gambian football for generations. As one sports commentator put it, “You can argue opinions, but you cannot argue results. Bajo’s era has given Gambian football its most successful decade.” Conclusion Those attempting to tarnish Bajo’s name over stadium works are barking up the wrong tree. The facts are clear: stadium rehabilitation is a government project, not a federation mandate. Meanwhile, Bajo and his team have delivered unprecedented results on the pitch and in institutional development. History will not remember the noise of the critics, but the legacy of a leader who helped transform Gambian football into a continental force.

This story was produced by JarraNews Staff Writer -

Suntou Touray's Response to Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang’s Remarks on Coffee Time with Peter Gomez

By Suntou Touray – DHM London

Former Gambian army officer, Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang, now based in Switzerland, recently appeared on Coffee Time with Peter Gomez on West Coast Radio. In that interview, while recounting his supposed role in the struggle against the former dictator Yahya Jammeh, Mr. Sanyang made several claims that are misleading and require immediate correction. Most notably, he alleged that he met me in Geneva during human rights advocacy meetings. This is categorically false. I have never met Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang in person—neither in The Gambia, Geneva, nor anywhere else. The only interaction I recall with him was a brief greeting over Skype many years ago, long before WhatsApp and other modern platforms became common. For clarity: I attended the 2014 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) advocacy meeting in Geneva, organized by Mr. Yaya Dampha of Amnesty International Sweden, where we engaged with UN officials on Gambia’s human rights crisis under dictatorship. I also participated in the 2015 Socialist International Conference in Geneva alongside Mrs. Janiaba Bah (Sweden) and Mr. Yahya Darboe (USA), representing the UDP. At no point was Mr. Sanyang present in any of these forums. His attempt to insert himself into events where he played no role is misleading and disingenuous. These fabrications undermine the sacrifices of Gambians—both at home and in the diaspora—who genuinely risked their lives, freedom, and livelihoods in the fight for democracy. History must be told with honesty, not embellished with false claims of heroism. Equally troubling was Mr. Sanyang’s comparison between the presidency of H.E. President Adama Barrow and the brutal dictatorship of Yahya Jammeh. Such comparisons are both dishonest and unfair. Let us be reminded: Mr. Sanyang never set foot in The Gambia during the years of dictatorship, yet today he freely enters the country, grants interviews, and criticises openly without fear. That freedom itself is a testament to the democratic space created under President Barrow’s leadership. Unlike Jammeh’s regime of repression and fear, President Barrow’s administration accommodates dissent, tolerates criticism, and strengthens the rule of law. To equate this openness with dictatorship is not only an insult to the truth but also an insult to those who suffered under real tyranny. For the sake of historical accuracy and respect for those who sacrificed everything for The Gambia’s freedom, we must ensure that our national dialogue is rooted in truth, integrity, and sincerity—not self-promotion or fantasy. Mr. Sanyang’s distortions cannot and must not go unchallenged. I rest my case.

Abdoullie Sanyang’s False Claims on ECOMIG Deployment

By Mai Ahmed Fatty

Recent claims by Abdoulie Sanyang regarding the 2017 ECOMIG deployment in The Gambia are nothing short of deliberate falsehoods. Any suggestion that he had knowledge of, or played a role in, the intervention is a distortion of history and a fabrication of the highest order. As someone directly involved at the forefront of the negotiations, I can state unequivocally that Sanyang’s assertions are baseless. I was the only Coalition Leader who attended the first closed-door meeting of ECOWAS Heads of State in Abuja in December 2016, where the legality of regional military intervention in The Gambideliberated. I also participated in the decisive Bamako meeting with President-elect Adama Barrow, where the decision to intervene militarily was unanimously endorsed. In Abuja, I was accompanied by Hon. Hamat Bah on behalf of the Coalition. During consultations at Aso Rock, I was summoned alone by the Heads of State to present the legal and political justification for intervention. In Bamako, I joined President-elect Barrow in the critical session where ECOWAS leaders resolved to authorize the use of force to uphold the will of the Gambian people. These engagements, along with numerous bilateral negotiations, were conducted under strict secrecy and delicate diplomacy, entrusted to me with the full authority of then President-elect Barrow. As the first Minister of Interior under the Coalition Government, I was fully privy to the high-level decisions shaping the ECOMIG mission in The Gambia. Abdoulie Sanyang’s claims are, therefore, not only false but also indicative of a troubling propensity for disinformation.

It is both shocking and disappointing that Sanyang would resort to such fabrications. His assertions are reckless, misleading, and without merit. The truth of The Gambia’s transition must not be distorted by fanciful inventions.

Six Defeats Too Many? UDP Cyber Warrior Warns Darboe

Nanama Keita, a UDP cyber warrior known for his open support of Mayor Talib Bensouda’s candidacy as UDP flagbearer, has urged Ousainou Darboe not to contest the presidency in 2026. In a Facebook write-up, Keita stated: “If Ousainou Darboe were my father—and I say this with the utmost respect for a man old enough to be one—I would plead with him not to contest the presidency in 2026.”

He argued that Darboe, a veteran lawyer who rose to become Foreign Minister, Vice President, and at one point the de facto President, has already achieved enough to secure his place in history. According to Keita, Darboe does not need the presidency to validate his legacy, and a continued pursuit of the office could risk overshadowing his accomplishments. Keita warned that another defeat—what would be Darboe’s sixth in three decades—could have damaging consequences for both the UDP and its long-time leader. “If a struggle begins and ends with one individual, then it was never truly a collective struggle—it was always about that individual,” he wrote. However, Keita also noted that the situation could be turned into an opportunity. He suggested that Darboe could strengthen his legacy by focusing on renewal within the UDP, championing a successor, and leading a generational transition. Doing so, he argued, would demonstrate that the UDP is bigger than any one individual and would secure the party’s future beyond 2026. He concluded with a pointed question: Will 2026 be about Darboe himself, or about the future of the UDP?

Lamin J Darboe Slams UDP’s Flag Bearer Process as “Unfair and Undemocratic”

The United Democratic Party’s (UDP) recently launched flag bearer selection for the 2026 presidential race is already mired in controversy, as prominent Gambian lawyer Lamin J Darboe has accused the party of manipulating the process to sideline challengers and shield its leadership from competition. Darboe, who holds both Gambian and British citizenship, disclosed to The Standard that he had intended to vie for the party’s ticket. However, a clause requiring applicants to renounce dual nationality within just 14 days has effectively eliminated his chances. He dismissed the condition as both impractical and unnecessary, given that the presidential polls are more than a year away.

“It is impossible to renounce British citizenship in two weeks. The UDP’s deadline is designed to shut people like me out, not to promote fairness,” Darboe lamented. “Preferential Treatment” for Party LeaderDarboe went further, openly questioning whether the rules are being selectively applied to protect Secretary General and long-time Party Leader Ousainu Darboe. “Are we about to witness preferential treatment for the Party Leader, while ordinary members are trapped by arbitrary conditions?” he asked pointedly. He accused the leadership of sidelining loyal supporters who contribute financially to the party while shielding executives who do little to sustain it. “In 2020, I was abroad in the UK and sent D10,000 for the party congress—twice the contribution of the entire executive committee combined. Yet somehow, loyalty and commitment are measured in ways that exclude people like me,” Darboe fumed. History of Rigged ProcessesThe lawyer reminded Gambians that this is not the first time UDP has betrayed its own democratic rhetoric. He cited the 2021 selection process as a sham. “Four people applied, but only Ousainu Darboe was even given a hearing. The rest of us were ignored. That was not a contest—it was an anointment, in flagrant violation of both UDP rules and democratic principles,” he said. Darboe suggested that the party’s leadership is more interested in preserving its grip on power than fostering genuine competition. “To hear senior figures recently cite my name as an example of UDP democracy is an insult, because what I experienced was the exact opposite,” he added. A Party at a CrossroadsWith the 2026 elections looming, Darboe’s withdrawal highlights a growing rift within the UDP. Once considered the country’s strongest opposition force, the party now faces mounting questions about its credibility, internal democracy, and its willingness to embrace change. For Lamin J Darboe, however, the verdict is clear: “The system is rigged, and I will not lend legitimacy to a process that mocks both fairness and transparency.”