Dangers Of Alh. Mustapha Sillah’s Rhetoric Tribal Sermons

A Divisive Voice in Gambian Politics: Why Mustapha Sillah’s Rhetoric is Dangerous.

By Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: The Gambia’s evolving democracy is a hard-won achievement, a beacon of resilience and progress forged through collective sacrifice and determination. But democracy, though liberating, also opens its doors to the wolves in sheep's clothing—individuals who exploit freedom not for the greater good, but to further their own divisive agendas. It is disheartening to see the toxic rhetoric of tribalism and extremism creeping into our national discourse, led by figures like Alhaji Mustapha Sillah, whose words seek to divide where we most need unity. If The Gambia is ever to fail as a state, it will be because of individuals like Mustapha Sillah and others who perpetuate tribal bigotry and religious extremism. These divisive figures thrive on sowing seeds of hatred in an already fractured nation desperately in need of healing. Yet, instead of being condemned, Sillah is applauded by

some, given platforms in the media to further his toxic rhetoric, and allowed to deepen the cracks in our fragile unity. Fatoumatta: Nobody can deceive us with ethnicity, tribalism, or religious sentiments. In The Gambia, "patriotism" often takes on an ethnic, religious, or regional identity. When a leader shares your primordial characteristics—be it tribe, religion, or region—"patriotism" becomes a convenient shield, and holding that leader accountable is labeled "treason." But when the leader belongs to the "other" side of the divide, everything is reversed. Criticism becomes a duty, and patriotism is discarded. Mark Twain was right when he said, "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel." If your "patriotism" is situational, driven only by the affinities you share with a leader, then you are, to borrow from Twain, a "scoundrel." True patriotism transcends tribal, religious, and regional lines—it is rooted in the collective good of the nation. Fatoumatta: We live in a dangerous time, threatened by ethnic, religious, regional, and partisan absurdities. These divisions are not just petty; they are perilous. As one of my professors once hyperbolically described, we risk becoming a nation mentally shackled by these primitive divides. It is time to rise above this silliness and reject the rhetoric of those who seek to exploit our differences for their own gain. Sillah’s audacity to meddle in Gambian politics is as troubling as it is hypocritical. Where was this so-called preacher during Yahya Jammeh’s 22-year reign of terror? When Jammeh persecuted religious leaders, exiled imams, and silenced dissent with brutal force, Sillah remained conspicuously silent. He lacked the courage to speak out against Jammeh’s long stay in power or the atrocities committed under his regime. Yet today, in a democratic Gambia, Sillah finds his voice—not to promote unity or progress, but to attack President Adama Barrow’s leadership and stir tribal tensions. Sillah’s recent remarks are not only divisive but deeply xenophobic. Why should a non-Gambian preacher, with no stake in our nation’s future, feel entitled to dictate our political discourse? His inflammatory rhetoric, blending religion with politics, serves only to incite contempt among Gambians and their leaders. It is a dangerous game, one that exploits the vulnerabilities of our democracy for the benefit of his political paymasters. Fatoumatta: In an interview on VM La Kacha Dula, Sillah accused President Barrow of failing to honor his commitment to step down after three years in office. He claimed Barrow is deceiving the Gambian people by positioning himself for re-election, despite the absence of a constitutional term limit. While Sillah’s critique of Barrow’s leadership may resonate with some, his selective outrage reveals a glaring double standard. Why did he not hold Jammeh to the same standard? Why does he now feel emboldened to attack a democratically elected leader while remaining silent during decades of tyranny? Sillah’s hypocrisy extends beyond his political commentary. As an extreme conservative, he has wielded his sharp tongue to attack various tribes, including his own, targeting individuals and communities without drawing upon the divine teachings he claims to represent. His words are not those of a unifier or a spiritual guide—they are the tools of a provocateur, intent on deepening divisions for personal and political gain.

The Gambia’s democracy is still young, and its strength lies in its ability to foster unity amidst diversity. Politicians who exploit religious leaders like Sillah to wage their battles must be held accountable. Blending religion with politics, especially through unchecked incendiary remarks, undermines the progress we have fought so hard to achieve. Fatoumatta: As Gambians, we must reject the toxic tribalism and xenophobia that figures like Mustapha Sillah promote. Our democracy is not perfect, but it is ours to nurture and protect. We cannot allow outsiders with divisive agendas to derail our progress. Instead, we must focus on building a nation where dialogue is constructive, criticism is fair, and unity is paramount. The Gambia’s strength lies in its people—diverse, resilient, and united in their shared aspirations for a better future. Let us not be swayed by those who seek to exploit our differences for their own gain. Instead, let us rise above the rhetoric of division and work together to safeguard the democracy we have fought so hard to achieve.

April 2000 Student Massacre Deserves National Day of Prayers

Why must Gambians remember April 10/11, 2000 Student Massacre with a National Day of Prayers: So, no one will ever again have to lose their lives, something that has happened decades ago with impunity. The lives lost through targeted political violence and collateral damage in the line of political fire have value, are sacred, and deserve justice. On April 10/11 Day, we remember valiantly, as one step towards a long and arduous fight to reclaim the value and sanctity of every single life in the Gambia. Let us never forget those tears and screams that have penetrated the nights' silence from the broken hearts of ordinary citizens. Fatoumatta: The system has failed them, one regime after another, and we must clean up the decay in the system. This is a call to all Gambians of good conscience, regardless of what

politician you support. This one thing unites us all: That all Gambian lives are important. Fatoumatta: We must remember with a National Prayers Day. Fatoumatta:The April 10/11 2000 student massacre, has become iconic of the brutality unleashed by a paranoid dictator that fostered distrust and encouraged lawmakers to grant immunity to perpetrators of those who massacred fourteen students after investigations proven to be a pointless farce. But while the story is recognizable around the globe, as the darkest day in Gambian history, many in The Gambia don’t know much about the events leading up to that horrific moment of April 10/11, 2000 student demonstration, but we have living witnesses and protagonist of April 10/ 11 to tell their stories. But what happened in April, was so deeply disturbing, we still feel shaken to our cores. Our automated responses to tragedy faltered that day as we all mirrored each other's looks of horror. While we do not doubt the power of prayers, that day it did not feel like it was enough. When kids are massacred, nothing can ever be enough, knowing in our hearts it meant nothing. That was the day the reality of our helplessness hit us in full force, and it does not feel like we deserve to ever recover. Our cries for justice remain half-hearted, for nothing can make up for so devastating a loss. When you live in The Gambia, it takes a lot to break through the self-protective numbness you develop in reaction to all the killings of defenseless students. You hear about terror and bloodshed, and you are not immune, but it doesn't necessarily break you down. A solemn remark about how humanity is doomed, perhaps a National Day of Prayer for the deceased, and a conviction to the perpetrators can only bring give it a closure. Fatoumatta: This year's anniversary is significant. Not only does it mark more than a decade since the incident, which is referred to as the April 10/11 Event, but it also serves as a grim reminder of Gambia’s record of impunity. As no state official has even been held accountable for the massacre of this incident has become emblematic of the culture of impunity that continues to plague The Gambia to the detriment of real reconciliation within our society. No amount of remembrance can ever be enough for those fourteen students and those live-in pain and trauma. Journalist Omar Barrow a victim.

No Amount of Bigotry Can Stop the NPP

In recent times, we've seen an alarming trend among self-proclaimed media "gurus" and political activists who have transitioned into right-leaning critics. These individuals relentlessly attack members and supporters of the National People's Party (NPP), while also denouncing every step or statement from President Adama Barrow. Since gaining independence in 1965, no political party in The Gambia has achieved what the National People's Party has accomplished. The NPP was hastily formed by dedicated citizens in response to the betrayal experienced from lawyer Ousainou Darboe, the United Democratic Party (UDP), and a group of so-called elites. They viewed the 2016 electoral defeat of Yahya Jammeh and the transition away from dictatorship as a golden opportunity to seize the nation’s resources and secure power for themselves. In contrast, patriotic Gambians who supported President Barrow rallied together to establish the NPP, ready to compete against established parties with little experience or insight into the struggles of the ordinary Gambian. Many of these elites seemed more concerned with support from a diaspora that had largely been cowed by Jammeh’s oppressive regime or were indifferent to the cries of the Gambian people.

The NPP demonstrated its strength by decisively defeating these larger, established parties in the 2021 presidential elections and securing a majority in the National Assembly. This success has fueled the anger of opposing factions, who have now resorted to bigotry, despite many being political newcomers themselves.

As we approach the 2026 presidential elections, these critics are taking to social media platforms, engaging in inflammatory rhetoric and self-importance. They falsely believe they are the most educated, dismissing NPP members—especially President Barrow—as merely "semi-educated." Meanwhile, the NPP continues to win over the hearts and minds of the electorate, as the so-called major parties fade into irrelevance. The NPP is an authentic voice of the people, and Gambians recognize the remarkable progress made during President Adama Barrow's eight years in office. The peaceful atmosphere, along with significant infrastructural advancements—from road networks to healthcare facilities and educational institutions—serves as undeniable proof of the party's accomplishments. The NPP does not need to seek validation on your platforms like desperate opportunists. It is clear that the second-rate conduct of many of these critics is known to us. We will not stand idly by while they distort facts and perpetuate a negative narrative about the government. The Gambian people endured tremendous hardships under the past regime, during which many of these critics played minimal roles in advocating for freedom of expression and the press.

We’ve seen vocal members of civil society condemning President Barrow for urging civil servants to carry out their duties effectively and to align with government policies. It's essential to remember that a government's primary responsibility is to ensure that civil servants fulfill their roles in alignment with official programs for the greater good. The civil service in The Gambia needs reform and a shift in attitude to better serve the populace. Corruption and inefficiency must be eradicated. Civil servants must understand that they are funded by the state and should be dedicated to their work. The pervasive lethargy and resistance stemming from opposition to the NPP government are adversely affecting the lives and livelihoods of many Gambians. President Barrow's call for accountability should be commended by all true patriots.

Activism should not equate to opposing every decision made by the president and his administration. The role of civil society organizations and activists is to engage constructively, offering insights and recommendations for improvement rather than mere opposition.

In conclusion, bigotry and baseless rhetoric will not prevent the NPP from winning the 2026 presidential elections. The electorate knows what they want and will not be deceived. We will rise to the challenge, just as we did in 2021, and deliver a resounding victory for the mighty National People's Party (NPP) Yaya Dampha Coordinator NPP DIASPORA GROUP

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐖𝐅𝐏 𝐒𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐀𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐧𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭

On Thursday the 3rd of April 2025 the honorable Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation and Gambians Abroad,Honourable Ambassador Lang Yabou signed a Letter of Understanding (LOU) on behalf of the Government of The Gambia with the World Food Programme (WFP).

The signing ceremony, held in Banjul, was officiated by Ambassador Lang Yabou and the WFP Country Director, Ms. Mirande Sende.

This agreement reaffirms the strong partnership between The Gambia and WFP in advancing food security, nutrition, and resilience-building efforts in line with the Country Strategic Plan (2024–2028), at an estimated value of USD 95,226,668. The two dignitaries highlighted the significant benefits and achievements registered by the long-standing partnership between the Government of The Gambia and the World Food Programme—especially in the areas of the school feeding programme, support to smallholder farmers, nutrition support for vulnerable people, and capacity-strengthening initiatives. Permanent Secretary Ambassador Yabou reaffirmed the Government’s commitment to fostering strategic partnerships with international organisations and other partners to enhance the well-being of Gambians and ensure sustainable development.

Journalism in The Gambia On Life Support

From Watchdogs to Publicists: The Collapse of Gambian Journalism; Alagi Yorro Jallow

Fatoumatta: The lifeblood of any democracy lies in its media—a press that informs, educates, and holds power to account. In The Gambia, this lifeblood is critically endangered. Journalism, once a beacon of truth and accountability, stands on the precipice of irrelevance. Online media platforms have forsaken Gambian stories and priorities, leaving citizens adrift and democracy vulnerable. If journalism in The Gambia is not restored to its rightful role, the nation risks losing the very foundation of its democratic governance. Journalism in The Gambia is not just struggling; it is on life support. The shift to online platforms has brought with it a collapse in ethical standards. Many outlets now recycle content from Senegalese newspapers or irrelevant sources, neglecting critical Gambian issues and failing to hold the government accountable. The core principles of journalism—informing, educating, and entertaining the public—have been abandoned. Instead, these platforms have morphed into public relations machines for politicians and celebrities. Gambian stories are overshadowed by an overwhelming focus on Senegalese news, particularly figures like Ousmane Sonko and other key officials. This disproportionate coverage of Senegalese affairs raises serious concerns. While Senegal boasts over 300 newspapers and radio stations that rarely cover Gambian issues, Gambian media inexplicably prioritizes Senegal over its own pressing matters. This imbalance prompts questions about potential affiliations and external influences, particularly with organizations like Pastef. Gambian journalists must ask themselves: why act as propagandists for foreign political figures while neglecting their own nation’s needs?

The integrity of a democracy hinges on the strength of an independent press. In The Gambia, where freedom of expression is constitutionally guaranteed, the media has a responsibility to prioritize Gambian issues, especially with elections on the horizon. Local journalism is not just a public service; it is a democratic necessity. It bridges community divides, amplifies diverse voices, and clarifies how policies impact citizens' lives. It fosters political engagement, disseminates critical information during crises, and cultivates a strong local identity. The stakes for local journalism in The Gambia have never been higher. Without a revitalized press, the nation risks deepening political divides, eroding government accountability, and undermining democratic values. The decline of local news is insidious, fostering polarization, reducing voter turnout, and weakening the very fabric of democracy. Local journalism is not just important; it is indispensable. It empowers communities to understand the significance of local elections, encourages civic engagement, and ensures public officials are held accountable. Moreover, the lack of professional training among many editors and journalists in Gambian online media is a glaring issue. Many of these individuals are not trained journalists but proofreaders who have been invited into newsrooms without the necessary skills or ethical grounding. This lack of professionalism further erodes the quality of reporting and undermines public trust in the media. The Gambian media must also reflect on the disparity in coverage. How much attention does Senegalese media give to Gambian issues? The answer is stark: virtually none. Yet Gambian outlets devote significant resources to covering Senegalese affairs, particularly since the new government came to power last year. This raises serious questions about priorities and motives. Gambian journalists must realign their focus, ensuring that their reporting serves the interests of Gambians, not foreign political agendas. The future of democracy in The Gambia hangs in the balance. Without immediate efforts to restore the integrity of local journalism, the nation faces a chilling reality—a democracy without a voice. Fatoumatta: A democracy without a voice is a nation lost. Gambian journalists must rise above mediocrity, prioritizing Gambian narratives over foreign agendas. The future demands ethical, professional, and independent reporting to serve the people of this country. Anything less condemns The Gambia to an era where voices of accountability are replaced by echoes of external propaganda. The urgency is clear: journalism must reclaim its role as democracy's trusted ally. The moment to act is now—before the light of democracy fades into silence.

President Barrow Lacks Effective Advisers And Ministers To Counter Fake news

A Call for Transformation: Enhancing Leadership and Effective Public Communication Strategies in President Barrow's Administration. By Alagi Yorro Jallow

President Adama Barrow's administration stands at a crossroads, where the decisions made today will shape the nation's trajectory for years to come. The challenges facing his government—ranging from incompetence within the cabinet to the inability to counter misinformation—demand bold and decisive action. To restore public trust and ensure effective governance, the President must reconsider his team of ministers and advisers, prioritizing competence, accountability, and strategic communication. The current cabinet and advisory team have failed to rise to the occasion, demonstrating a lack of ambition and initiative that has hindered progress. Ministers cannot afford to adopt a passive "spare tire" mentality; their shortcomings have directly contributed to the administration's struggles. Unlike Barack Obama, who benefited from the unwavering commitment and strategic brilliance of David Axelrod, President Barrow lacks a team of advisers who can provide the same level of dedication and expertise. This absence has left the administration without the intellectual depth and strategic vision necessary to navigate complex challenges effectively. A critical area of concern is the government's outdated approach to public policy communication. The reliance on the Ministry of Information, an institution rooted in propaganda practices of a bygone era, is counterproductive. Modern governance demands transparent and strategic communication frameworks that engage the public and counter misinformation effectively. The government's failure to adapt to these demands has left it vulnerable to misinformation and public skepticism.

The recent fake news saga involving Kazakhstan and the manipulated trade deal data concerning The Gambia underscores the administration's inability to counter misinformation effectively. Fifth-columnists, including a former Yahya Jammeh-appointed ambassador and hired propagandists, have weaponized their online platforms to amplify falsehoods, targeting vulnerable populations. Despite efforts by concerned Gambian intellectuals to debunk these lies, the critics persist in spreading misinformation, exploiting the government's lack of intellectual depth and strategic communication capabilities. The decision to allocate 40 million dalasi to private media in an attempt to control narratives has proven to be a misguided and wasteful endeavor. Ironically, some of the very media outlets contracted for this purpose have turned against the administration, further complicating the government's efforts to manage its public image. Meanwhile, the chaotic social media landscape remains dominated by self-proclaimed activists, fifth-columnists, and hired propagandists, who continue to undermine the administration's credibility.

Fatoumatta: The inability of educated individuals within the government and the ruling NPP to effectively defend the administration against these adversaries is a glaring weakness. A comprehensive overhaul of the communication strategy is essential. This includes dismantling outdated structures like the Ministry of Information and replacing them with modern, transparent, and proactive communication frameworks. The government must prioritize building a team of skilled communicators who can effectively articulate its vision, counter misinformation, and engage with the public in a meaningful way. President Barrow must also resist undue influence from the party secretariat. The NPP party leadership has become consumed by internal conflicts and self-serving agendas, which have undermined the administration's effectiveness. Alarmingly, some beneficiaries of the 40 million dalasi contract have turned against the administration, highlighting the futility of such expenditures. In conclusion, President Barrow must take bold and decisive steps to address these challenges. By reshuffling the cabinet and advisory team, dismantling outdated communication structures, and investing in a modern and strategic public policy communication system, the administration can overcome its current weaknesses and pave the way for a brighter future. The government must adapt to the demands of the digital age and prioritize transparency, accountability, and progress to regain the trust and support of the people.