Editorial The Critical Challenge of Cabinet Ministers in Partisan Politics.

By Alagi Yorro Jallow.

Part 1 Fatoumatta: In a democracy, governance must rise above the fray of partisan theatrics; yet in The Gambia, cabinet ministers are increasingly mired in party politics, which severely undermines institutional integrity. Instead of embodying national service, they often showcase loyalty to the ruling party, transforming their roles into mere extensions of political allegiance. This alarming trend raises a crucial question: Should ministers act as political agents, or should they uphold the principles of neutrality and professionalism in serving the nation? Cabinet ministers in The Gambia are progressively entwined in partisan politics, creating significant concerns about the integrity of our governance. This entanglement leads ministers to prioritize party interests over the collective needs of the nation, often demonstrated by their overt endorsement of party policies that may not best serve the public good. Unlike their counterparts in other nations who maintain an impartial stance in public service, Gambian ministers frequently don in “Ashobi”, ruling party attire and engage in political rallies. This blurring of lines between governance and partisanship erodes the professionalism essential for effective national service. Historically, the 1970 constitution permitted politicians and parliamentarians to serve as cabinet ministers, a provision intended to ensure representation of the people’s political choices. However, this was later abolished to enhance governmental independence. Today, we observe ministers actively participating in party activities, betraying the core principle that public servants should represent the entire nation, not just a narrow political faction. Fatoumatta: Today, cabinet ministers flaunt their allegiance to the ruling party, donning "Ashobi" clothing at political events, including the inauguration of National People’s Party (NPP) offices. This situation demands a critical examination: Should cabinet ministers immerse themselves in party politics, or should they maintain a dignified distance from such partisan affairs? In contrast, countries like the United States exemplify a more balanced approach, where cabinet secretaries—such as the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense—engage in political matters with prudence and restraint. Unlike elected officials, their roles are not centered around political campaigning or party functions. Instead, their political involvement manifests in a more substantive way: In other democracies, cabinet secretaries serve as the President's key advisors, leading policy formulation and ensuring the government's agenda is executed effectively. This advisory role is inherently political, yet it influences national strategy and direction. They act as the public face of their respective departments, championing policies before Congress, the public, and international audiences. For example, the Secretary of State oversees foreign relations, while the Secretary of Defense manages military and national security matters. These roles, while requiring significant political engagement, are firmly rooted in the interest of the nation, rather than mere party loyalty. Despite often being appointed by the President from the same political party, cabinet secretaries are expected to serve the entire nation, transcending the interests of individual political factions. This expectation is particularly critical for positions involving diplomacy and national security, where professionalism and strategic governance must always overshadow partisan considerations. Ultimately, we must insist that our cabinet ministers prioritize the interests of national governance over the shackles of party politics. While political engagement is an inevitable aspect of policymaking, the emphasis must be on leadership, expertise, and the preservation of institutional integrity. It is imperative that we shift our focus from political theatrics to genuine and effective governance. A comparative analysis of other democracies reveals more principled practices. In the United States, cabinet secretaries engage in politics by influencing government policy and advising the President, yet they maintain a clear boundary by refraining from open political campaigning and partisan displays. Their primary duty is national service, not the promotion of party interests. The Gambian government must act decisively to address this troubling trend and restore professionalism to our leadership. Ministers must be held accountable to prioritize governance, focusing on policy and public service rather than political theatrics. Failure to uphold these standards could lead to a continued erosion of institutional integrity, ultimately threatening the very foundations of governance. Fatoumatta: By recommitting to professionalism, we can forge a future worthy of our collective investment. Governance must be rescued from the clutches of political spectacle and restored to its vital purpose—serving the nation with dignity, expertise, and foresight. If ministers fail to uphold the ideals of neutrality and discipline, The Gambia risks further degradation of institutional integrity, where governance becomes indistinguishable from partisan activism. A government that values professionalism over distraction is not merely a government; it is a beacon for a future worth defending.

Editorial: Bravo CG Darboe and Team At GRA

Bravo Mr. Commissioner General Yankuba Darboe and the esteemed team at the Gambia Revenue Authority

We at JarranewsTV wish to extend our heartfelt congratulations and commendations for the exceptional performance and monumental achievements that the Gambia Revenue Authority (GRA) has demonstrated over the past month. The D500 million revenue collection in May alone is a testament to your unwavering dedication, visionary leadership, and the relentless efforts of your entire team, particularly Mr. Saikou Balajo and Mr. Raphael Mendy, as well as the entire GRA team at the Gambia Ports.

This remarkable feat not only underscores the effectiveness of GRA’s ongoing digital transformation into Smart Customs but also showcases your commitment to enhancing operational efficiency and transparency within the revenue collection process. By harnessing cutting-edge technology, the GRA is redefining the standards for revenue collection in The Gambia and establishing a robust framework that enhances accountability and fosters a culture of excellence. Your accomplishments are not merely figures on a spreadsheet; they represent a significant milestone in the development of our nation's economic landscape. This monumental revenue collection will undoubtedly contribute to the betterment of public services and infrastructure, thus benefiting all Gambians. Your leadership has not only brought about tangible results but has also inspired confidence among stakeholders, citizens, and businesses alike. As you continue on this path of innovation and excellence, we encourage you and your team to remain steadfast in your mission. The foundation you have laid today will cultivate a brighter future for The Gambia, and for that, you deserve every bit of recognition and praise. Once again, congratulations on this significant achievement. Your hard work and commitment to excellence do not go unnoticed, and we look forward to witnessing even greater accomplishments from the Gambia Revenue Authority under your exemplary guidance. With sincere appreciation,

President Adama Barrow's Vision for Industrialization and a Clean Future

Transforming The Gambia: President Adama Barrow's Vision for Industrialization and a Clean Future In an inspiring move toward a brighter future for The Gambia, His Excellency, President Adama Barrow, recently met with a distinguished delegation from Shukran Capital Management (SCM). This pivotal meeting centered around the groundbreaking "Waste-2-Fuel Project"—a revolutionary initiative that is set to redefine waste management in our beloved nation.

As The Gambia embarks on its journey to industrialization, this innovative project promises to turn waste into wealth—transforming hazardous dumpsites into productive environments. The Waste-2-Fuel Project will convert solid waste, tires, and other commercial refuse into clean, renewable Bio-Oil through cutting-edge technology. Not only will this initiative generate valuable by-products like compost for sustainable agriculture and recycled “green” plastics, but it will also pave the way for a cleaner, healthier nation.

President Barrow is committed to addressing the long-standing issue of waste management, a challenge that has hindered our progress for far too long. Under his visionary leadership, this initiative will not only enhance public health but also spur economic development and create jobs for our spirited youth. It is a bold stride towards a thriving industrial economy that embodies the resilience and determination of the Gambian people. The president’s assurance of political will reflects a renewed focus on elevating our nation’s image through effective waste management solutions. He has called on SCM and our dedicated officials to delve deep into the viability of this transformative proposal, setting the stage for a prosperous future grounded in sustainability and innovation. The meeting, attended by Ousianou Senghore, Executive Director of the Gambia Investment and Export Promotion Agency, featured a competent delegation led by Modou Kabirr M. O. Faal, SCM’s Executive Chairman and Goodwill Ambassador for The Gambia, alongside eminent experts from Kuwait, Belgium, and Germany. Together, they stand ready to champion the cause of revolutionizing waste management in The Gambia.

With President Barrow at the helm, The Gambia is poised to emerge as a beacon of industrial progress and environmental stewardship. The Waste-2-Fuel Project is not just a step towards cleaner cities; it is a leap into the future—a future where our waste is transformed into opportunity and our country thrives like never before! Join us in supporting this vital initiative as we work together towards a cleaner, healthier, and more prosperous Gambia!

Singapore’s Special Envoy Visits The Gambia High Commission in London

The Gambia High Commission in London recently welcomed Mr. Yap Ong Heng, the Special Envoy of the Minister for Transport of the Republic of Singapore, for a courtesy visit with Chargé d’Affaires a.i., Mr. Sulayman Suntou Touray. This meeting highlighted the strengthening partnership between The Gambia and Singapore, focusing on opportunities for greater collaboration in transport, maritime, aviation, and environmental sustainability. Key Topics Discussed: - Capacity Building and Skills Transfer: Strategies to enhance technical expertise in aviation, maritime, and land transport sectors. - IMO Compliance and Best Practices: Sharing knowledge on the implementation of International Maritime Organization (IMO) conventions. - Climate Sustainability Collaboration: Support for The Gambia’s National Action Plan for greenhouse gas reduction, aligned with the IMO GHG Strategy. - Education and Training: Expanding fellowships and professional development in governance and public sector reform. - Multilateral Cooperation: A commitment to mutual support in international platforms such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the IMO. Notably, 118 Gambian professionals have benefited from training at Singapore’s Aviation Academy, alongside maritime training facilitated by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore.

The discussion also noted Singapore’s Climate Decarbonisation Blueprint for 2050, which serves as a model for advancing climate-resilient infrastructure efforts. Both nations expressed optimism about future engagements, with plans for further coordination through national channels and upcoming initiatives. The meeting culminated in a reaffirmation of the long-standing diplomatic friendship between Singapore and The Gambia. Attendees Included: From Singapore: Mr. Yap Ong Heng, Special Envoy; Ms. Lau Bee Juan, Senior Assistant Director. From The Gambia High Commission: Mr. Sulayman Suntou Touray, Chargé d’Affaires a.i.; Mrs. Sainey Barrow, Counsellor; and interns Ms. Abi Barry and Mr. Zindi Anthony Levi.

Ambassador Conteh's Open Letter To H.E Dr. Mamadou Tangara

Dear Dr. Tangara, I am compelled to address you in light of the remarks made during your recent town hall discussion on the "Mansa Kunda" program on May 16, 2025. While the session illuminated various aspects of your ministry’s policies and challenges, it became abundantly clear that your comments on the cadre of diplomats you referred to as "political appointees" lacked not only clarity but also fairness.

Your description of these individuals as merely beneficiaries of political favoritism, rather than competent professionals, reflects a profound misunderstanding of their qualifications and contributions. By oversimplifying their appointments to a matter of political allegiance, you undermine the reality that many of these diplomats possess exemplary credentials, extensive professional experience, and a commitment to serving our nation's interests on the global stage. It is striking that you singled out the foreign service for alleged incompetence while neglecting to acknowledge that political appointments also span other vital roles within the government. The cabinet ministers, ambassadors, and senior civil servants, filled by politically motivated selections, are not all disgraced individuals. Are we to assume that the diplomatic corps alone is unworthy of respect? This narrative is not only misleading but also dangerously divisive. You have accused this group of diplomats of being the source of numerous issues within our missions, branding them as untrainable and unfit for their roles. Such statements not only rip the fabric of essential diplomatic engagement but also convey a damaging stereotype that dismisses the complex realities of our foreign service. Instances of misconduct, such as those you cited in Rabat and Havana, while regrettable, should not serve as a blanket indictment of all politically appointed diplomats. Accountability lies not solely with them, but also with your ministry’s apparent failure to address challenges as they arise. A proactive approach could have mitigated many conflicts before they escalated. Moreover, your silence on incidents involving the diplomatic community, including the alarming actions leading to certain diplomats being declared "persona non grata" by the U.S. State Department, raises further questions about accountability within your own ranks. Ironically, as you cast aspersions on political appointees, you overlook that many may not have been privy to the same shortcomings you ascribe to others.

It is essential to remember that these purported "misfits" have often sacrificed their well-being to oppose tyranny, enduring persecution and suffering while fighting for the democracy that we enjoy today. They, more than anyone, understand the principles of our nation and the obligations that come with representing The Gambia abroad. Instead of vilification, they deserve recognition and support as vital contributors to our diplomatic efforts. Furthermore, your lack of engagement with the valuable perspectives of Gambians abroad is alarming. Their cries for active participation in national elections, representation in the National Assembly, and inclusion in cabinet appointments must not fall on deaf ears. To ignore the potential and plight of the Gambian diaspora is a disservice to our nation's collective progress. The future of our foreign service cannot be shackled by outdated regulations or a lack of strategic engagement from your office. As we venture further into 2025, reform and modernization are not merely aspirations; they are imperatives. It is time to elevate the conversation around our foreign policy and diplomatic engagement, focusing on collaboration and inclusivity rather than division. I urge you to reconsider your stance, not only towards the diplomatic representatives whom we have entrusted with our nation's image abroad but towards the vast potential that lies within the Gambian diaspora. Our collective future depends on forging unity, fostering respect, and embracing the diverse talents and experiences that every Gambian brings to the table. Yours sincerely, Alkali Fanka Conteh

Jammeh’s Dangerous Conspiracy

Jammeh’s Dangerous Conspiracy: The Threat of Misinformation in West African Diplomacy. The Legacy of Deception. Rejecting Falsehoods & Embracing Transparency. Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: Yahya Jammeh, Gambia’s exiled former dictator, has once again resurfaced in the political discourse—this time through a leaked audio filled with conspiracy theories and unsubstantiated claims of oil theft. His accusations against Senegalese leaders, past and present, are not only reckless but pose a real risk of diplomatic instability between two nations whose futures are deeply intertwined. Jammeh’s statement, alleging that former Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade envied Gambia’s oil discovery and that current Senegalese Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko failed to stop its supposed theft, is a calculated attempt to stir tensions. His vow to “reclaim Gambia’s oil” upon his return is not just delusional but dangerous, as it exploits nationalist sentiments for personal political gain. Fatoumatta: Jammeh ruled Gambia with an iron grip for over two decades, systematically silencing opponents, suppressing dissent, and building a regime based on fear. He was notorious for fabricating narratives—from bizarre medicinal claims to fantastical economic promises—while siphoning state resources for personal enrichment. His sudden reemergence, now weaponizing conspiracy theories, is not surprising, but it demands a firm rebuke from Gambian authorities and the media. Misinformation is not harmless—it erodes trust, destabilizes relationships, and fuels unnecessary conflicts. If such baseless accusations gain traction, they could damage regional cooperation and economic progress that Gambia and Senegal have painstakingly built over the years.

As Gambia moves beyond Jammeh’s dark legacy, the nation must reject his divisive tactics. The government and civil society must counter misinformation with truth, ensuring that citizens do not fall prey to unfounded narratives. Regional diplomacy must be rooted in fact-based discussions, not conspiracy theories designed to manipulate public opinion. Fatoumatta: Jammeh may believe he can still shape political discourse from afar, but Gambia has moved forward. His era of deception is over—truth and accountability must now define the future.

Lawyer Melville Robertson Resigns From UDP

"THE DEAFENING SILENCE OF LEADERSHIP: MY FORMAL RESIGNATION FROM THE UNITED DEMOCRATIC PARTY"

In a move that echoes the urgent call for accountability, I, Melville Robertson Roberts, hereby announce my resignation from the United Democratic Party (UDP), a decision that weighs heavily on my heart yet is resolute in its necessity. For years, I have dedicated myself to the UDP, inspired by its commitments to transparency, accountability, and the rule of law—values that once ignited my hope for a better Gambia. However, I now see that hope without action equates to hypocrisy, and that is a path I cannot walk. The party’s insistence on standing by Ba Tambadou, despite alarming and unresolved allegations regarding the disposal of Jammeh’s assets, is not merely disappointing—it is disgraceful. The silence surrounding this matter is deafening, particularly in light of the demands from dedicated members who seek accountability and justice. Where is the UDP’s proud voice of reason and reform now? Are these values only to be upheld for the ordinary citizen while the powerful remain sheltered from scrutiny? My previous open letter to the party leadership was birthed from my faith that the UDP could elevate itself and truly lead by example. In a time when the current government turns a blind eye, it is imperative for the UDP to illuminate the path of ethical governance rather than remain shackled by silence. But silence in this context speaks volumes, revealing a troubling truth: accountability seems to be a privilege reserved for the powerless, while the influential escape unscathed. Until the UDP summons its courage and reclaims its voice, I find it impossible to continue under its banner in good conscience. The Gambia demands leadership that not only advocates for justice but embodies it. I will always honor the esteemed leader Ousainou Darboe and my fellow members with respect and regard. However, my admiration for the UDP will not compel me to compromise my principles. We all deserve more. The Gambia deserves leadership that acts with integrity and conviction. Melville Robertson Roberts Legal Practitioner, Social Commentator, and Advocate for Justice

Rebuttal: Defending President Adama Barrow's Administration

By Yaya Dampha Coordinator NPP DIASPORA GROUP

The article by Ensa A.B. Ceesay presents a skewed and overly negative portrayal of President Adama Barrow’s administration, inaccurately branding him a dictator without considering the significant strides made toward democracy and human rights in The Gambia since his leadership began.

First, let’s address the claim of human rights violations. The reality is, under Barrow’s administration, Gambians have witnessed an unprecedented level of freedom. For the first time in decades, citizens can express their opinions openly, participate in peaceful protests, and engage in political discourse without the constant fear of repression. This openness starkly contrasts with the era of Yahya Jammeh, where dissent was met with imprisonment, violence, or worse. If President Barrow were truly a dictator, it would be unjustifiable for him to allow such freedoms to flourish. The very idea of a dictatorship is antithetical to the environment of free expression that currently exists.

It's also crucial to highlight that there are no political prisoners in Gambia today, and journalists and human rights activists operate with a level of safety and freedom that did not exist prior to Barrow’s presidency. The actions against journalists accused of defamation or other crimes have often resulted in leniency, reflecting a commitment to uphold freedom of speech rather than silence dissent. Indeed, the Barrow administration has taken several steps to reform and protect press freedoms, showcasing an effort to correct past injustices rather than perpetuate them. Assertions about corruption, tribalism, and respect for the rule of law are important issues, but they do not paint the full picture. Yes, challenges remain, just as they do in any emerging democracy. However, these challenges do not warrant a blanket dismissal of the progress made under Barrow’s leadership. The establishment of more inclusive governance systems, engagement with international human rights bodies, and the incorporation of various political perspectives into the governance process are indicators of an administration striving for positive change. Furthermore, labeling Barrow as a dictator reflects a deeper misunderstanding or deliberate misinterpretation of Gambia’s political landscape. It ignores the fact that Barrow came to power through a coalition of diverse opposition voices that demonstrated a collective desire for change and reform. The same coalition, which now calls for accountability and democratic principles, is a testament to the political pluralism that Barrow has encouraged. Critics such as those represented in Ceesay's article often surge with the disappointment of their personal failures, failing to acknowledge the significant progress made. Their narratives may originate from a place of discontent but misconstrue the broader context of Gambian governance under Barrow. The motivations and character of those dissenting should not overshadow the real achievements made in the country. In conclusion, accusing President Adama Barrow of dictatorial tendencies is not only misguided but perilously overlooks the genuine strides made toward democratic governance and human rights in The Gambia. For the first time in a long while, we are witnessing a society where discourse thrives, human rights are being respected, and the aspiration for progress is palpable. It is important to recognize and uphold these aspects rather than yield to the cynicism that so easily takes root in political discourse. As we move forward as a nation, it is paramount to support continued engagement, constructive criticism, and the celebration of the freedoms we now enjoy.

Courtroom Is Not Where Truth Will Find Us Gambia

By Lawyer Melville Roberts The Courtroom Is Not Where Truth Will Find Us Gambia

t.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhY5DZliFRQv41VgwHElhLq_xMR5eTADFRT9TOsbab5OUSQcgIOyAo045D8pAGK-1dyhyphenhyphentT4dK_Yj1XJxu6O9Dt1UiC_vGFqAWYVkZRzmN4fp_X5sYnuQZb5PzjUsech0E4y9q4UOIoiJKNp-qOMeMfup4AeVqAjBZs9-k8ZvcEnrD7EzZHTA0CoQ7xY4k/s960/IMG_1214.JPG" style="display: block; padding: 1em 0; text-align: center; ">

. After watching tonight's episode of the Bantaba on Kerr Fatou, I was nearly moved to tears for a nation so consumed by a quest for truth, that finding it at whatever means, suddenly breeds a misconception of the very ideals of truth and fact finding. In the quiet desperation of a nation still grappling with its past, a belief is spreading like wild fire that if Alhagie Kurang and Amie Bensouda end up in court, the truth about the Janneh Commission and Jammeh’s looted assets will finally come to light.

It is a compelling idea. But it is also deeply misguided and misleading. Courtrooms do not exist to reveal the whole truth. They exist to test specific claims. What was said, what was done, and whether it violated the law. If Bensouda sues Kurang, or vice versa, what will be examined is that dispute and not the integrity of the entire Janneh Commission, not the fate of Jammeh’s assets, and most certainly not the unanswered questions the nation still carries.

This legal clash, if it comes, will not give us a national reckoning. It will not answer why there has been no full public audit of recovered assets, or why recommendations still gather dust. The courtroom cannot shoulder what our institutions have refused to carry. To place our hopes for truth in a trial between two individuals is to ask a scalpel to serve as a mirror. It will cut precisely, but only where directed. The broader truth, that of complicity, silence, and evasion solidly remains outside its reach. If we are to make sense of the Janneh Commission, its purpose, its limits, its legacy, we must go beyond personalities and legal filings. We must demand accountability from those who hold the reins of state power today. We must insist on transparency, not just in court, but in cabinet meetings, National Assembly sessions, and public reports. We must elevate our national conversation beyond rumors and rivalries. Because if we continue to place the weight of our truth-seeking on the shoulders of individual conflict, we will always be disappointed. The courtroom will close, the ruling will come, and we will find, once again, that the real questions remain unanswered.

The truth we seek is not in a defamation case or a public spat. It is in our refusal to forget. It is in our insistence that national memory be respected. It is in our courage to say that commissions are not enough, and that justice delayed, distorted, or diluted is justice denied.

If we want answers, we must demand them not from a court case, but from our government, our parliament, our civic spaces. We must understand that justice does not live in legal drama,it lives in public accountability. Until then, we risk mistaking sparks for sunlight, conflict for clarity and the truth we so desperately seek will remain just out of reach. M R R.

Rtd.Lt. Colonel Samsudeen Sarr’s Selective Outrage and Intellectual Dishonesty.

A Response to Lt. Colonel Samsudeen Sarr: Selective Outrage and Intellectual Dishonesty. Alagi Yorro Jallow

Fatoumatta: Lt. Colonel Samsudeen Sarr’s latest attempt to vilify my defense of President Adama Barrow’s ceremonial attire lacks both historical grounding and intellectual honesty. His exaggerated critique—a blend of misplaced mockery and selective outrage—deliberately distorts the role of the Commander-in-Chief while conveniently ignoring well-established traditions. It is neither unprecedented nor unusual for civilian heads of state to don military attire in ceremonial settings. Leaders across Africa and beyond—including Tanzania’s Samia Suluhu Hassan, Senegal’s Macky Sall, and Ghana’s Jerry Rawlings—have all worn military regalia in official capacities without sparking misplaced controversy. Such attire symbolizes the authority vested in the head of state, reinforcing their position as the symbolic leader of the national defense forces. Sarr’s reaction, however, is not rooted in a genuine concern for military professionalism but in personal animosity and political opportunism. His history of contradiction—from his book Coup d’État in The Gambia, which he later retracted under pressure, to his erratic use of pseudonyms like "Ebou Kolley" and "Arac Pacobi"—reflects a pattern of intellectual dishonesty. His attempted transformation from Jammeh enabler to self-styled commentator is riddled with inconsistencies that undermine his credibility.

Moreover, his exaggerated framing of President Barrow’s appearance as "cosplay" exposes not only a failure to engage in substantive discussion but a deliberate effort to trivialize established governance norms. Presidents do not wear military regalia to “play soldier.” They do so in recognition of their constitutional authority, a practice embedded in traditions across multiple political systems. Fatoumatta: Rather than offering a thoughtful critique, Sarr’s response devolves into theatrical disdain, laced with personal attacks that have no bearing on the actual issue at hand. If he were genuinely interested in governance, he would acknowledge that presidential symbolism extends beyond uniforms and is rooted in historical precedence. But such an acknowledgment would require intellectual consistency—something he has demonstrated time and again to be beyond his reach.

As for his accusations, it is ironic that a man whose credibility was so tarnished he was denied the opportunity to testify at the Truth Commission would attempt to lecture others on integrity. His selective outrage, aimed more at personal grievances than objective discourse, is not only misplaced but a reflection of his longstanding struggle to reconcile his contradictions. A meaningful discussion on governance requires depth, historical awareness, and logical coherence. If Lt. Colonel Sarr is truly interested in engaging in such discourse, he must first reckon with his own conflicted record before attempting to lecture others on political symbolism. Lt. Colonel Samsudeen Sarr’s erratic criticisms and selective outrage epitomize a pattern of intellectual inconsistency that has long defined his public posture. His history of contradiction—of fabricating, retracting, and maneuvering to regain favor—stands as testament to a credibility crisis that no amount of theatrical prose can conceal. Real discourse demands integrity, historical awareness, and intellectual honesty. It is not shaped by resentment nor sustained by petty attacks. When someone like Sarr, whose own credibility was deemed too compromised to testify before the Truth Commission, attempts to lecture others on governance, one is reminded that opportunism often masquerades as wisdom. Fatoumatta: The presidency is not a spectacle, nor is national symbolism a trivial pursuit for political theatrics. It is grounded in tradition, reinforced by constitutional authority, and wielded as a representation of leadership. Sarr’s dismissal of this reality—driven more by personal vendetta than genuine critique, reflects the desperation of a man who has long lost the intellectual weight to engage in serious debate. History will not remember the loudest voices, but the most principled ones. And in this discourse, the contrast is clear.

Opinion: Letter To Lawyer Melville Roberts On Bensouda Kurang Law Suit

Upholding Integrity in our Discourse Dear Mr. Melville Robertson Roberts and others the sentiments you expressed are commendable, but it is essential to acknowledge that, as observers, we found your words to be flattering. I would like to respectfully remind you that, not so long ago, you were involved in a Facebook Live broadcast where you lost your composure and hurled insults at someone who had allegedly defamed and spoken disparagingly about your child. As a legal professional, your reaction was quite temperamental, and you resorted to using profanity. While freedom of speech and dissenting views are fundamental principles, it is crucial to recognize that they can be challenging to uphold in practice. The primary distinction in this instance was that you were not holding public office, but several hundreds of thousands of people including individuals including myself look up to you, much like you admire Lawyer Amie Bensouda. Many people had to urge you to reconsider your actions, and you even intended to block those who advised you to disregard the individual who had spoken ill of you and your daughter. You could have taken the higher ground and refrained from resorting to personal attacks, which included disparaging remarks about the individual’s mother. Lawyer Amie Bensouda chose to pursue legal action, which was the honorable course of action, and it highlights the importance of respecting the laws of our country The ongoing discussions surrounding the alleged illegal sale of looted assets belonging to Yahya Jammeh have raised significant concerns about how we address unsubstantiated claims within our society. It is imperative that those with allegations present solid evidence to the relevant authorities, allowing the judicial process to take its course. If proven guilty, individuals responsible for any wrongdoing must be held accountable.

As a member of the legal community, I recognize the serious implications of libel, defamation, and character assassination. The recent decision by Lawyer Amie Bensouda to use Facebook Live to confront unfounded claims made by Mr. Mamadi Kurang raises questions. Should such an important discourse devolve into a contentious “he said, she said” scenario? I believe it should not. Instead, we would have benefited from Lawyer Bensouda directly addressing the Gambian people, clarifying how the Janneh Commission managed the sales of the assets in question. That said, I commend her for taking legal action against Mr. Kurang, providing him an opportunity to either present evidence for his claims or face the consequences of a lawsuit. This was not a threat; it was a chance for him to substantiate his assertions. Lawyer Amie Bensouda is a respected member of our community—a loving mother, wife, and fellow Gambian who deserves protection from baseless allegations. Unfounded claims against her, or anyone for that matter, must not go unchecked. It is not just Lawyer Bensouda who has taken a stand; we have seen others, like Abubacarr Jawara, pursue legal redress in the face of defamation. It is crucial that we foster a culture of truthfulness and integrity in our discourse. When confronted with contentious issues, we must either speak truthfully or choose silence. This isn't about stifling dissent; it’s about combating the arrogance and misinformation that undermine our society.

I extend my sympathies to those aligning with Mr. Kurang, yet I must point out that his posture appears rooted in a troubling arrogance, which hinders our nation’s progress. Lawyer Bensouda’s courageous actions serve to promote our democracy and establish a precedent: that conveniently disregarding the truth will not be tolerated. Let us strive toward a more respectful and fact-based dialogue, while ensuring that individuals like Lawyer Bensouda are protected from unsubstantiated attacks. Sincerely, Ensa Ceesay for police Cadet

Gambia Emphasizes Integrated Border Management for Enhanced Trade Facilitation

In a significant stride towards improving trade processes, Hon. Yankuba Darboe, the Commissioner General of the Gambia Revenue Authority (GRA), underscored the Gambian government's commitment to integrated border management during a recent workshop on coordinated border management. This five-day event, gathering representatives from various sectors including Customs, the Gambia Police Force, and the Immigration Department, aims to consolidate efforts to craft a comprehensive framework for border management. During his keynote address at the workshop hosted at the Senegambia hotel, Darboe articulated the government's recognition of Coordinated Border Management (CBM) as paramount for enhancing trade facilitation. He stated, “Our goal is to improve border efficiency, streamline our trade processes, and foster robust inter-agency collaboration.” Central to these discussions is a Draft Strategy for 2025-2029 developed by the GRA, aimed at modernizing border management and facilitating smoother trade operations. This strategy is part of a broader initiative to bolster The Gambia’s trade ecosystem. Since 2021, The Gambia has collaborated with the World Customs Organization (WCO) through the Accelerate Trade Facilitation Programme, which focuses on implementing the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA). Darboe highlighted the areas identified for improvement, such as ongoing border delays and procedural complexities that hinder efficient trade.

Currently, border operations in The Gambia involve 6 to 10 government agencies, which presents significant challenges. Darboe emphasized the importance of CBM reforms in addressing these issues, stating that better coordination would lead to reduced trade costs and stimulate economic growth. Despite the ongoing initiatives, Darboe acknowledged gaps in practical knowledge regarding CBM implementation. He outlined the GRA's requirements for capacity-building, which include standardizing operating procedures across border agencies, harmonizing data for effective exchange, and devising comprehensive risk management strategies. The workshop also featured insights into a draft inter-agency standard operations framework on CBM, developed by a working group representing various border agencies. This framework was crafted through virtual sessions with WCO experts, highlighting the collaborative approach needed to establish a robust border management system. Key elements of the draft framework encompass legal provisions, operational guidelines for border agencies, and protocols for the efficient physical movement of goods through ports. Additionally, it addresses expedited clearance systems for various goods categories, enhancing the overall efficiency of border operations.

In closing, Darboe pointed out that the implementation of capacity-building initiatives within the GRA would lay the foundation for standardized operating procedures at all points of entry in The Gambia. He further reinforced the importance of collaborative efforts among border agencies to facilitate effective trade flow while ensuring proper revenue collection. Echoing this sentiment, Mr. Jim Clarke from the WCO reiterated the critical need for information-sharing between border agencies to ensure seamless trade operations while safeguarding The Gambia’s revenue interests. Their collective efforts signify a proactive approach to developing a modern and integrated border management framework.

Lawyer Melville Roberts Open Letter To Amie Bensouda

Dear Mrs. Amie Bensouda, I pen this letter with a heavy heart, burdened by sorrow yet driven by a profound sense of love and disappointment. It is not easy to address you, a woman I have long admired and respected, whose legacy transcends common admiration. However, the truth compels me to speak, even when it is difficult.

The recent cease and desist letter directed at Kurang has shaken me—not for its legal implications, as you are undoubtedly one of the finest legal minds of our time, but for the emotional weight it carries. It signifies a rift, a silence, an unwillingness to engage in open discourse. Instead of fostering dialogue, it conveys a sense of threat and deterrence.

You have dedicated your life to fighting against injustice, illuminating dark corridors of truth, and giving voice to the voiceless. This course of action—this legal silence cloaked in warnings—wounds deeply. Many, including myself and Kurang, have raised questions regarding the actions of the Commission. These inquiries are not attacks; they are a quest for clarity and understanding, born out of a sincere desire for truth. My love for you remains steadfast. I believe in the greatness that resides within you—a greatness rooted not in the exercise of power but in the pursuit of justice. I implore you not to allow this moment to cast a shadow on your legacy. Do not let the public, who have cherished your name, perceive you as someone who would silence uncomfortable truths. I do not believe you personally sold Jammeh’s assets. As a lawyer, I understand the structure, limitations, and responsibilities involved. While you served as lead counsel, the final decisions rested with a broader collective. However, leadership also encompasses how one responds to challenges. The nation deserves clarity and a robust rebuttal to the concerns raised. Unfortunately, the threat of legal action only stirs suspicion and obscures the transparency you have always championed. We can disagree while still holding each other in mutual respect. I can challenge certain actions yet honor your name. However, I cannot support a narrative that stifles legitimate dissent through intimidation. That is not who you are. You have stood before Lady Justice with grace and dignity, inspiring generations to see justice as a calling rather than merely a profession. As someone who cares deeply for you, I want you to know that you are cherished. After Kurang publicly insulted me for defending you, I stood tall, advocating for him when he faced arrest and detention. I chose to rise above personal attacks. I refuse to be diminished by baseless claims; I remain steadfast in my truth. I will not stand idle as your name is tarnished, nor will I support an environment where dissent is quashed by the threat of lawsuits. Please, rise above this situation, not out of obligation to Kurang or to me, but in honor of the values you have so ardently defended throughout your life. Demonstrate to the world that your voice confronts truth, embraces it, and responds with clarity and courage. With unwavering respect and affection, Melville Robertson Roberts, Esq. Derbyshire, England