Major Secka Completes UK Defence Academy Workshop

By JarraNews Staff Writer

Shrivenham, United Kingdom – August 28, 2025 – Major Abdoulie Secka of the Gambia Armed Forces has successfully completed a Joint Doctrine Development Workshop at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom in Shrivenham.

The intensive programme, organised by the UK Ministry of Defence and delivered by the Integrated Warfare Centre, brought together participants from both NATO and non-NATO countries. The training focused on the United Kingdom’s joint doctrine development process at strategic and operational levels, combining lectures, practical exercises, and modules on effective writing for doctrine formulation.

Gambia’s High Commissioner to the UK, Her Excellency Dr. Fatou Bensouda, praised Major Secka’s dedication and urged him to remain steadfast in service to the nation. Deputy Head of Mission, Mr. Suntou Touray, also underscored the importance of continuous training, describing the Gambia Armed and Security Forces as a reliable institution tasked with safeguarding national security. He noted that since 2017, the force has embarked on a series of reforms and capacity-building initiatives designed to modernize the army. Reflecting on his experience, Major Secka expressed gratitude for the opportunity to train in England. He said the knowledge and skills gained will play a vital role in strengthening the operational effectiveness and doctrinal development of the Gambia Armed Forces.

Editorial: Hypocrisy Has No Place in the Gambia Police Force

Superintendent David Kujabi’s conduct is a test of leadership, discipline, and integrity in the GPF

The credibility of the Gambia Police Force (GPF) rests on discipline, integrity, and professionalism. When these values are undermined, the entire institution suffers. Today, that credibility is being tested by the conduct of Superintendent David Kujabi—a man whose rise within the Force tells a story not of merit, but of privilege and Kujabi did not build his career through the rigors of professional policing. He joined the police as a cadet after working as a teacher at Bwiam School. Since then, his postings have been confined to headquarters, where he secured a position as Police Public Relations Officer and later benefited from secondment opportunities. Despite his senior rank, he has never acquired the practical experience that defines a true police officer. This lack of grounding is evident in his recent behavior. Instead of upholding discipline, Kujabi has chosen to take to social media, styling himself as a critic of the very institution he serves. He couches his attacks in the language of democracy and accountability, but what lies beneath is clear: disgruntlement, indiscipline, and a dangerous disregard for the chain of command. A serving officer cannot claim to defend institutional values while openly violating the code of conduct that binds every member of the GPF. Worse still, Gambians remember the past. During the repressive era of Yahya Jammeh—when citizens were killed, silenced, and brutalized—Kujabi was no defender of justice. He was not among those who stood with the oppressed. Instead, he benefited from proximity to the regime, rewarded with promotions and privileges that ordinary Gambians could not dream of. For such a man to now lecture colleagues and the public on democracy and justice is the height of hypocrisy. Those who served and prospered under tyranny cannot suddenly claim the moral high ground when it suits them. This behavior is not harmless. It erodes public trust, undermines ongoing reforms, and threatens the integrity of the Force. If officers are allowed to publicly disparage leadership and institutional decisions with impunity, the GPF will descend into indiscipline and chaos. Leadership must not allow this dangerous precedent to take root. The solution is clear: Superintendent David Kujabi must face decisive disciplinary action. Whether through dismissal or demotion, the message must be unmistakable—unprofessionalism, hypocrisy, and betrayal of the institution will not be tolerated. Anything less would be a betrayal of the Force itself and of the Gambian people. The GPF is at a crossroads. To emerge as a truly professional, impartial, and disciplined institution, it must cleanse itself of double standards and hold its officers accountable. The Gambian people deserve a police service built on loyalty, discipline, and integrity—not opportunism disguised as principle. If the GPF cannot confront hypocrisy within its own ranks, it will never command the respect of the nation it claims to serve.

Hon. Billay G. Tunkara Pays Courtesy Call on Gambia High Commission in London

By JarraNews Staff Writer

LONDON, 26 August 2025 — The Majority Leader of The Gambia’s National Assembly, Hon. Billay G. Tunkara, who also chairs the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, has paid a courtesy call on the Gambia High Commission in London. Hon. Tunkara was warmly received by the Deputy Head of Mission, Mr. Suntou Touray, who conveyed the greetings and assurances of Her Excellency Dr. Fatou Bensouda, The Gambia’s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom. Mr. Touray reaffirmed the Mission’s commitment to closer collaboration with the National Assembly on matters of national interest.

During the visit, Hon. Tunkara underscored the critical role of The Gambia’s diplomatic missions, stressing that all government ministries, directly or indirectly, benefit from the work of Gambian diplomats abroad. The discussions between Hon. Tunkara and Mr. Touray focused on issues affecting Gambians living in the United Kingdom, particularly access to travel documents and essential consular services. Hon. Tunkara also expressed his appreciation for the High Commission’s hospitality and continued service to Gambians in the diaspora. Mr. Touray, for his part, briefed the visiting parliamentarian on the Mission’s extensive summer programme of community outreach. He highlighted the growing demand for biometric passport issuance in the UK and across other countries under the London Mission’s jurisdiction. Both parties further explored ways to strengthen the participation of Gambians abroad in the country’s development and political processes, recognising the invaluable contributions of the diaspora to The Gambia’s progress.

Barrow Moves to Address Telecoms Tariff Concerns

By JarraNews Staff Writer

Banjul, 26th August 2025 – President Adama Barrow has established a High-Level Committee to review recent telecommunications pricing regulations introduced by the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA). The move follows growing public concern after PURA’s tariff announcement last week, which sparked demonstrations by a group calling itself Gambians Against Looted Assets (GALA). Authorities declared the protest illegal, leading to the arrest of dozens of youths, several of whom have since been remanded by a Magistrates Court According to State House, the new committee will be composed of representatives from: 1. The Ministry of Communications and Digital Economy 2. The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs 3. The Ministry of Justice 4. The Ministry of Trade, Industry, Regional Integration and Employment 5. The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) 6. The Gambia Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (GCCPC) The committee is tasked with conducting a thorough and impartial review of the pricing regime, ensuring its findings are evidence-based and in line with the government’s policy of safeguarding competition and consumer welfare. President Barrow emphasized that the establishment of the committee reflects his government’s commitment to transparent and consultative governance. He assured Gambians that their rights, interests, and welfare in accessing fair and affordable telecom services will be protected. “The Government recognizes the concerns of the public and remains steadfast in its resolve to safeguard consumer rights while preserving the integrity of the competitive market,” the statement noted. Authorities also cautioned against illegal demonstrations, urging citizens to express their concerns through lawful and constructive channels. The public will be updated on the committee’s findings and further steps as consultations progress.

Opinion: Diaspora Agitators Are Abusing Gambia’s Democracy for Their Own Gain

By Samba Baldeh

It is nothing short of tragic that those who played no role in the long and painful struggle to remove dictatorship from The Gambia—those who were completely absent until late 2014, when their close relatives became victims of tyranny—are today the loudest voices urging our youths into the streets against the police, despite the reality of democracy and rule of law in this country. People like Juka Ceesay, Tukulorr Sey, Ben Suwareh, and other self-styled diaspora “activists” have reduced politics to little more than adrenaline-seeking agitation. Their noise on Facebook and WhatsApp is their only claim to relevance. Since their emergence in the final years of Jammeh’s rule, they have devoted themselves to destabilising The Gambia—not through constructive ideas or sacrifice—but through endless noise-making from their living rooms in the U.S. and U.K. Let’s be honest: no nation has ever developed by turning its youth into idle protesters who blame the government for every shortcoming while refusing to take responsibility for their own growth. Development comes from action, discipline, and hard work—not constant ranting online. Take Juka Ceesay as an example. She tragically lost her brother in 2014, but rather than channelling her grief into something productive, she has turned it into a lifelong campaign of bitterness against President Barrow. Tukulorr Sey thrives on the dopamine of Facebook likes, patrolling timelines for division, her activism more about attention than nation-building. And then they dare to call this “democratic struggle.” Protest is indeed a right—but it is not a lifestyle, nor a business model for collecting diaspora donations. This culture of endless protests that these individuals are exporting into The Gambia is toxic, unsustainable, and fundamentally dishonest. In the very countries they live—America, the U.K.—no one can protest without permits and strict rules. Why then do they expect The Gambia, a young democracy, to tolerate chaos disguised as activism? Turning social media into a circus of division is not activism. It is the abuse of democracy. And it feeds directly into the argument many African thinkers have made: that Africa is being pushed into “democracy” without the time to build the strong institutions and disciplined civic culture that the West took centuries to develop. Instead of direct colonial interference, today’s destabilisation comes through diaspora loudmouths whose motives are anything but national interest. President Barrow must not be distracted by this posturing. During Jammeh’s brutal era, many of these so-called activists were silent, enjoying their personal lives abroad. Now, suddenly, they parade as the conscience of the nation while insulting judges, security officers, and civil servants who are simply carrying out their duties. Even in America, if you defy the law in protest, you face arrest. But when Gambian law enforcement upholds the same principles, these diaspora agitators scream “dictatorship.” This hypocrisy is nauseating. Democracy without law and order is not democracy—it is anarchy. And to the Gambian youth: stop letting yourselves be manipulated by these attention-seekers thousands of miles away. You have opportunities before you—education, entrepreneurship, community building. Instead of wasting your energy on Facebook live streams and protests for protest’s sake, invest in building your own future. This country needs builders, not pawns for diaspora egos. Finally, the UDP—once respected as a voice of maturity in opposition politics—must reflect deeply. Aligning with every anti-government bandwagon only diminishes its credibility. Opposition must mean offering alternatives, not promoting chaos. The time has come to draw the line: democracy is not a toy for diaspora adventurists. It is the lifeblood of our nation, and it must be protected from those who would abuse it for likes, donations, and personal validation.

Police Confirm Suspected Baby Dumping in Tallinding Farokono

By JarraNews Staff Writer

The Gambia Police Force has confirmed the arrest of a 25-year-old woman in connection with an alleged case of baby dumping in Tallinding Farokono. According to a police statement issued on Sunday, August 24, 2025, the suspect, identified as Isatou Jawneh of Farato, was apprehended by members of the public after allegedly attempting to abandon a newborn. She was escorted to the Tallinding Police Charge Office by a crowd along with the infant. Police said officers immediately transported the baby to Kanifing General Hospital, where the child was sadly pronounced dead on arrival. During questioning, Ms. Jawneh reportedly admitted that although she is married, the pregnancy resulted from a relationship with her boyfriend. Due to the size and intensity of the crowd gathered at the station, she was later transferred to Bundung Police Station for her safety. The body of the deceased baby has been transferred to the Banjul mortuary for preservation and a possible postmortem examination. Police say investigations into the matter are ongoing.

Clearing the Misconceptions: Understanding the Police Intervention

Mai Ahmad Fatty

Recent events surrounding the aborted protest at the headquarters of the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) have sparked a wave of commentary, much of it driven by speculation and misinformation. To provide clarity, it is important to separate fact from perception and examine the situation from a legal and civic perspective. First, let us address some of the misleading claims circulating: The police did not act to enforce PURA-approved data tariffs. The police did not intervene to shield the commercial interests of GSM companies. The police did not suppress the protest out of a desire to deny citizens their rights. The police did not act to appease the ruling National People’s Party (NPP). Such assertions are unfounded and amount to deliberate disinformation aimed at undermining public trust in law enforcement. The Legal and Practical Context The choice of protest venue raised legitimate concerns. The PURA building also houses a commercial bank and private offices. Any obstruction could have impeded access to these facilities, caused fear among occupants, and disrupted essential services such as ATMs. Additionally, the site is located next to a foreign diplomatic mission, which carries special protections under international law. Any breakdown of order in such proximity could have serious consequences. A fundamental principle of democracy is that the right to protest does not override the rights of others to access public facilities or private businesses. Peaceful assembly is protected, but obstruction of public life is not. Courts worldwide have consistently upheld this distinction. The Police Mandate Based on these principles, the police had legal grounds to intervene when there was a strong likelihood of disruption. However, intervention should always follow recognized standards: Warnings first: Protesters should be given the chance to relocate. Minimal force: Only the force necessary to restore order should be applied. This approach balances competing rights — protecting freedom of expression while safeguarding access to businesses, public services, and roadways. The Broader Implications The protest site was in the heart of a busy commercial district, along Pipeline Road, one of the country’s most vital highways. The risk of major disruption was undeniable. Well-trained police forces around the world often manage such situations by designating alternative protest areas, a step that should have been part of the organizers’ planning. Civil society organizations, such as the E.F. Small Center, have raised legitimate concerns. These voices are essential in a democracy. Yet, the preferred approach is to exhaust dialogue and legal avenues before resorting to the streets. This builds trust and partnership between citizens and law enforcement, while reinforcing respect for the rule of law. The Way Forward The police are tasked with serving and protecting, not oppressing. Protesters, on the other hand, enjoy the right to assemble and speak freely — but always within the boundaries of the law. The guiding principle remains clear: one must either obey the law or be held accountable under it. Ultimately, citizens must recognize that the State and Government are not separate from us — they are us. Peace, law, and order serve everyone’s best interest. Holding public officials accountable must always be done within the framework of legality. May peace prevail in The Gambia. 🇬🇲

GFF Officials Attend CAF Strategic Roundtable in Kampala

By JarraNews Staff Writer

The President of the Gambia Football Federation (GFF), Hon. Lamin Kaba Bajo, and the Federation’s General Secretary, Mr. Lamin Jassey, are currently in Kampala, Uganda, where they joined 18 other representatives of African football federations at the CAF IMPACT Strategic Roundtable. The high-level gathering, convened by the Confederation of African Football (CAF), is aimed at strengthening governance and accountability within the sport across the continent. The CAF IMPACT program—described as a flagship initiative—seeks to ensure the proper implementation and utilization of development funds, while promoting transparency, sound financial management, and improved football infrastructure among CAF Member Associations and Zonal Unions.

Speaking after the first day of discussions, General Secretary Jassey highlighted the importance of the forum, noting that it brought together presidents and general secretaries from more than 19 member associations for an engaging roundtable exchange on the future of African football governance. The conference continues in Kampala with deliberations expected to shape reforms and best practices in football administration across Africa.

Respect Our Police – A Call for Unity and Decency

There is a growing and troubling tendency among some Gambians to look down upon our police officers, often dismissing them with the statement: “We pay your salaries.” This mindset is not only disrespectful, but it is also factually misguided and socially dangerous. Let us be fundamentally clear: every civil servant in The Gambia – from teachers to nurses, soldiers to police – is paid through the Consolidated Revenue Fund, which is made up of taxes and duties contributed by all Gambians, including the very police officers being insulted. In fact, many police officers directly contribute through payroll taxes, indirect taxes on goods and services, and even license and regulatory fees. It is entirely possible that a police officer pays more tax than the very individual who arrogantly claims to “pay his salary.”

The police are not outsiders. They are not strangers “living off the people.” They are our people: our brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, uncles, and neighbors. They walk the same streets we do, struggle with the same high costs of living, and share in the same national destiny. Their uniform is not a sign of superiority, but of responsibility – the responsibility to maintain law and order, often at great personal risk. A society that constantly disrespects its law enforcement institutions is a society that invites chaos. We cannot demand safety and peace yet ridicule and undermine those tasked with protecting both. To insult a police officer in uniform is not just an attack on an individual – it is an attack on the very fabric of law and order that holds our nation together. Criticism of misconduct is valid and necessary. Accountability is important. But blanket disrespect, public humiliation, and casual insults toward all police officers are unjust and counterproductive. Respect does not mean blind obedience; it means recognizing their role, their sacrifices, and their shared humanity.

To my fellow Gambians: let us rise above this habit of disdain. Let us treat our uniformed men and women with the same dignity we expect for ourselves. Respecting our police is not about inflating their egos – it is about preserving our peace, strengthening our democracy, and reminding ourselves that we are one people bound by mutual duty and respect. Peace is everybody’s responsibility. Respect is everybody’s duty.

Editorial: The Menace of Cyber Bullying and the Attack on Superintendent Lamin Sarr

In recent days, our nation has witnessed an alarming and dangerous trend: the use of online platforms to malign, insult, and defame individuals who are merely carrying out their duties to the nation. The latest victim of this toxic culture is Police Superintendent Lamin Sarr, a respected officer whose only “crime” was upholding the rule of law and ensuring public order. Superintendent Sarr, acting within the bounds of his mandate, dispersed unlawful protesters who sought to disrupt peace and stability. His actions were not personal. They were not political. They were in strict alignment with the laws of The Gambia, laws that safeguard our democracy, protect citizens’ freedoms, and preserve the peace we all cherish. When protesters ignored repeated warnings to disperse, Superintendent Sarr gave the order for their arrest. This was not an abuse of power—it was a lawful exercise of his authority. Those who defy lawful police orders and persist in unlawful assemblies face arrest and prosecution under Gambian law. That is how a nation governed by law operates. No individual or group has the right to flout the law and then vilify the officers who enforce it. And yet, instead of being commended for his courage and professionalism, Sarr has become the subject of relentless online harassment. Cyber bullies, hiding behind screens and false bravado, have chosen to defame his character, insult his person, and circulate malicious publications. Let it be stated clearly: those engaged in this online harassment are not exercising freedom of expression—they are committing crimes.

Cyber bullying, online defamation, and the deliberate circulation of falsehoods are prosecutable offenses under Gambian law. More than that, they are also violations of international cybercrime prevention conventions to which The Gambia is a party. Offenders may be held criminally liable, and prosecutions can extend beyond national borders. Those who believe that cyberspace provides them immunity are gravely mistaken. The law is clear: online abuse is a crime, and criminals will face justice. Freedom of speech, expression, assembly, and movement are indeed sacred rights guaranteed to every Gambian. But these freedoms are not absolute. They come with responsibilities. They must be exercised with respect for truth, for justice, and for the dignity of others. To abuse these freedoms by weaponizing social media against individuals is to betray the very principles of ethical governance and responsible citizenship. We must be clear: online platforms are not exempt from accountability. They cannot and must not be used as breeding grounds for character assassination. The circulation of defamatory material not only destroys reputations but also undermines trust in our institutions, weakens social cohesion, and threatens the peace we have worked so hard to maintain. Superintendent Lamin Sarr deserves respect, not ridicule. He represents the many men and women in uniform who stand between order and chaos, often at great personal risk. To vilify such an officer is to vilify the rule of law itself. We therefore call upon all Gambians—especially those active online—to reflect deeply on the power of their words and the consequences of their actions. We urge the relevant authorities to take firm measures against cyber bullying and defamation, ensuring that our digital spaces remain platforms for constructive dialogue, not weapons of destruction. Peace-loving Gambians should celebrate officers like Lamin Sarr, who uphold the law with integrity and courage. Let us rise above pettiness, resist the temptation of online mob justice, and instead build a culture of respect, truth, and responsibility—both offline and online. Because in the end, a nation that allows the destruction of its protectors through defamation will ultimately erode its own peace and stability. And those who believe they can commit crimes in the digital world without consequence should think again—the law is watching, both at home and

From Election Hero to Corruption Suspect: Police Recommend Charges Against Njai

By JarraNews Staff Writer

Alieu Momar Njai, the retired election chief once celebrated for presiding over the historic 2016 polls that ended Yahya Jammeh’s 22-year rule and forced the former dictator into exile, now finds himself at the centre of a corruption storm. Police investigators have recommended that the 91-year-old former chairman of the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) face charges of corruption and abuse of office. A ten-month probe, launched after auditors flagged suspicious transfers of over 301 million dalasis into private bank accounts of election returning officers, uncovered widespread financial mismanagement within the Commission. According to investigators, Mr. Njai personally authorised nearly 16 million dalasis in what they describe as unlawful allowances to staff. The report also recommends prosecuting IEC Finance Director Anthony Robert Secka for negligence and for approving irregular transfers of public funds into private accounts. Further findings point to procurement violations and an overpayment to a contractor worth almost $100,000. The police file, now with the Ministry of Justice for legal advice, could mark a dramatic fall from grace for a man once hailed as the guardian of The Gambia’s democratic transition.

Sanyang Remanded as Arson Case Heads to High Court

Radio Interview Lands Sanyang in Mile II

By JarraNews Staff Writer

KANIFING, August 22, 2025 — A dramatic turn of events unfolded at the Kanifing Magistrates’ Court yesterday when Abdoulie Sanyang, who recently made controversial remarks on Coffee Time with West Coast Radio, was hit with four serious criminal charges and ordered remanded at Mile II Central Prison. Sanyang is accused of Arson, Seditious Intention, Incitement to Violence, and Obstruction of Judicial Proceedings under the Criminal Offences Act 2025. Of these, Arson — a capital offence carrying life imprisonment — dominated court arguments, as it stripped the Magistrates’ Court of jurisdiction. Acting Principal Magistrate Thomas Touray presided over the arraignment, where prosecutors pressed for the case to be sent to the High Court. They argued that although three of the counts could technically be tried before the Magistrates’ Court, all four should move together. The State further stressed that under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Arson is non-bailable, and urged the court to remand the accused while awaiting trial. The application was granted in full: all charges were transferred to the High Court, and Sanyang was ordered to remain in custody at Mile II. This ruling marks the beginning of what could become one of the most closely watched trials of the year, given the gravity of the charges and the high-profile platform where the alleged offences originated.

Seven Navy Officers Dismissed Over Security Breaches

By JarraNews Staff Writer

BANJUL, 19 August 2025 – The Gambia Armed Forces (GAF) has discharged seven naval personnel with immediate effect after uncovering what military investigators described as deliberate misconduct and gross breaches of discipline that endangered national security. The dismissal, announced Wednesday, follows a series of high-profile arrests between May and June involving two speedboats and a yacht believed to have been used in activities that compromised the integrity of naval operations. Military intelligence, working alongside other security agencies, concluded that the seven officers were directly involved in unauthorized maritime activities linked to Altima Sea Sport Limited, a company nowinvestigation for activities inconsistent with its declared operations. According to findings, the officers prepared and launched vessels without authorization, coordinated movements in breach of duty, and benefitted materially—including cash rewards and livestock—while betraying the trust vested in them as servicemen. Cell-site analysis and corroborated testimonies provided irrefutable evidence of collusion.

The GAF named those dismissed as: Lieutenant (N) Abba Nyassi Fleet Chief Petty Officer (FCPO) Musa Dampha Warrant Officer Class 2 (WO2) Ismaila Jobe Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Musa Jammeh Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Alagie Secka Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Ebou Marong Leading Seaman (LS) Lamin DK Sanneh In a statement signed by Acting Public Relations Officer Captain Kemo Kanuteh, the Armed Forces stressed that the action reflects its zero-tolerance stance on corruption, collusion, and any breach of military ethics. “These individuals acted in direct violation of their oath of service and posed a clear risk to operational security,” the statement read. “Their removal is necessary to preserve discipline, safeguard national interests, and maintain public trust in the Armed Forces.” The military leadership reaffirmed its commitment to discipline and professionalism, vowing to defend the sovereignty of The Gambia while ensuring that “indiscipline or misconduct of any kind will not be tolerated.”

Five Convicted in Jabang Drifting Case

By Staff Reporter

The Brusubi Magistrates’ Court has handed down convictions to five young men involved in a dangerous drifting incident along the Sukuta–Jabang Highway, a case that sparked public concern over reckless driving. The court imposed both prison sentences and heavy fines on the offenders. The sentences are as follows: Momodou Martin Sanyang: D25,000 fine and three years’ imprisonment with hard labour. Serigne Mass Gaye: D1,000 fine and three months’ imprisonment with hard labour on one count; D25,000 fine and three years’ imprisonment with hard labour onanother. Muhammed Bah: D20,000 fine (or two years’ imprisonment with hard labour in default) and an additional D25,000 fine plus three years’ imprisonment with hard labour.

Ismaila Faal: D25,000 fine and three years’ imprisonment with hard labour on one count, plus D20,000 fine (or two years’ imprisonment with hard labour in default) on another. Samba Ceesay: D25,000 fine and three years’ imprisonment with hard labour. The court directed that Sanyang and Gaye, both juveniles, serve their sentences at Jeshwang Prison. The Gambia Police Force (GPF) welcomed the verdict, noting that it reflects the authorities’ determination to combat reckless driving and safeguard road users. The police commended the efforts of the Anti-Crime Unit, responding officers, and the Prosecutions Unit, while also thanking the Jabang community for its cooperation in apprehending the suspects. Police spokespersons reiterated that reckless driving, including drifting, will not be tolerated, and assured the public of continued enforcement to ensure safety on the country’s roads.

Tunkara Refutes Sanyang’s Remarks on April 14 Protest

Lamin A. Tunkara has strongly refuted recent comments made by Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang during an interview with West Coast Radio, describing them as “egregious, reckless, and a deliberate distortion of facts.” Mr. Tunkara said the remarks falsely implicated him in the events of April 14, 2016, when Gambians staged a peaceful demonstration demanding electoral reform and addressing the Senegalo-Gambia border impasse.

“The protest involved citizens—including my own brothers—who were exercising their constitutional rights in a peaceful and democratic manner,” Tunkara stated. “To suggest that I played any role in instigating harm is not only false but an insult to the sacrifices of those who stood for justice.” He emphasized that his role at the time, like that of many others, was solely focused on uniting Gambians in the pursuit of democratic change. “My involvement in national affairs has always been guided by principles of justice, fairness, and transparency,” he noted. Tunkara further accused Mr. Sanyang of politicizing a sensitive moment in the country’s history. “Unlike Mr. Sanyang, I have always stood for the values that underpin a free and democratic society,” he said. Reflecting on the events of 2016, he expressed pride in his contribution, alongside thousands of Gambians and international partners, who acted “out of conviction and ism.” He added: “Some paid a heavier price than others, but all did so in the service of The Gambia.” Now serving in government, Tunkara reaffirmed his commitment to the country’s leadership and development. He urged Sanyang to exercise “greater caution and responsibility” in his public statements, warning against “using subterfuge to court relevance.” “As a nation, we must move forward not by tearing each other down, but by building on the sacrifices, hard work, and progress that brought us this far,” Tunkara concluded.

Bajo’s Leadership Steers Gambian Football to Historic Heights Amid Unfounded Criticism

By JarraNews Staff Writer

In the face of misinformed online chatter and unfounded accusations, the leadership of Retired Captain Lamin Kaba Bajo has proven to be one of the strongest pillars of Gambian football’s rise in recent years. Contrary to claims by detractors who attempt to link him with delays in the Independence Stadium renovations, facts show that Bajo and his executive team at the Gambia Football Federation (GFF) have been focused on building institutions, strengthening grassroots structures, and raising the international profile of Gambian football. Setting the Record Straight on Stadium Renovations

It is worth clarifying that the Ministry of Youth and Sports—working with the central government—is solely responsible for the rehabilitation of the Independence Stadium in Bakau. The protracted work, though delayed, has now been completed and certified by CAF and FIFA, restoring the facility to international standards. The GFF, under Bajo’s stewardship, had no control over the stadium reconstruction process. In fact, Gambia was not alone in suffering the inconvenience of moving home matches abroad while renovation work was ongoing. Many African nations, from Sierra Leone to Liberia, have also endured similar displacements due to CAF bans on substandard venues. Gambia itself hosted “home” matches in Morocco against Seychelles and in Franceville, Gabon against the Panthers during this period—decisions compelled by CAF, not the GFF. Achievements Under Bajo’s Watch While critics spread half-truths online, Bajo’s record speaks volumes. Under his leadership, Gambian football has reached milestones once thought unimaginable: Senior National Team Breakthrough: The Scorpions qualified for their first-ever Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in 2021, advancing all the way to the quarter-finals. They followed this with a second consecutive AFCON appearance in 2023—proof of consistency, not chance. Youth Football Excellence: The Young Scorpions, Gambia’s U-20 side, became WAFU Zone A Champions in 2018 and 2020, while finishing as runners-up in the 2023 Africa U-20 Cup of Nations and securing multiple bronze medals in earlier editions. Women’s Football Growth: Through FIFA-backed “Live Your Goals” initiatives and inter-school competitions, more than 2,200 Gambian girls have been introduced to the game. Regular U-15 jamborees and U-17 pathways have been established to nurture future stars. Leadership That Builds Institutions Captain Lamin Kaba Bajo’s leadership has been marked not by empty rhetoric but by visionary planning and institution-building. The structures he and his executive have put in place—from grassroots football to elite national squads—are laying a foundation that will serve Gambian football for generations. As one sports commentator put it, “You can argue opinions, but you cannot argue results. Bajo’s era has given Gambian football its most successful decade.” Conclusion Those attempting to tarnish Bajo’s name over stadium works are barking up the wrong tree. The facts are clear: stadium rehabilitation is a government project, not a federation mandate. Meanwhile, Bajo and his team have delivered unprecedented results on the pitch and in institutional development. History will not remember the noise of the critics, but the legacy of a leader who helped transform Gambian football into a continental force.

This story was produced by JarraNews Staff Writer -

Suntou Touray's Response to Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang’s Remarks on Coffee Time with Peter Gomez

By Suntou Touray – DHM London

Former Gambian army officer, Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang, now based in Switzerland, recently appeared on Coffee Time with Peter Gomez on West Coast Radio. In that interview, while recounting his supposed role in the struggle against the former dictator Yahya Jammeh, Mr. Sanyang made several claims that are misleading and require immediate correction. Most notably, he alleged that he met me in Geneva during human rights advocacy meetings. This is categorically false. I have never met Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang in person—neither in The Gambia, Geneva, nor anywhere else. The only interaction I recall with him was a brief greeting over Skype many years ago, long before WhatsApp and other modern platforms became common. For clarity: I attended the 2014 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) advocacy meeting in Geneva, organized by Mr. Yaya Dampha of Amnesty International Sweden, where we engaged with UN officials on Gambia’s human rights crisis under dictatorship. I also participated in the 2015 Socialist International Conference in Geneva alongside Mrs. Janiaba Bah (Sweden) and Mr. Yahya Darboe (USA), representing the UDP. At no point was Mr. Sanyang present in any of these forums. His attempt to insert himself into events where he played no role is misleading and disingenuous. These fabrications undermine the sacrifices of Gambians—both at home and in the diaspora—who genuinely risked their lives, freedom, and livelihoods in the fight for democracy. History must be told with honesty, not embellished with false claims of heroism. Equally troubling was Mr. Sanyang’s comparison between the presidency of H.E. President Adama Barrow and the brutal dictatorship of Yahya Jammeh. Such comparisons are both dishonest and unfair. Let us be reminded: Mr. Sanyang never set foot in The Gambia during the years of dictatorship, yet today he freely enters the country, grants interviews, and criticises openly without fear. That freedom itself is a testament to the democratic space created under President Barrow’s leadership. Unlike Jammeh’s regime of repression and fear, President Barrow’s administration accommodates dissent, tolerates criticism, and strengthens the rule of law. To equate this openness with dictatorship is not only an insult to the truth but also an insult to those who suffered under real tyranny. For the sake of historical accuracy and respect for those who sacrificed everything for The Gambia’s freedom, we must ensure that our national dialogue is rooted in truth, integrity, and sincerity—not self-promotion or fantasy. Mr. Sanyang’s distortions cannot and must not go unchallenged. I rest my case.

Abdoullie Sanyang’s False Claims on ECOMIG Deployment

By Mai Ahmed Fatty

Recent claims by Abdoulie Sanyang regarding the 2017 ECOMIG deployment in The Gambia are nothing short of deliberate falsehoods. Any suggestion that he had knowledge of, or played a role in, the intervention is a distortion of history and a fabrication of the highest order. As someone directly involved at the forefront of the negotiations, I can state unequivocally that Sanyang’s assertions are baseless. I was the only Coalition Leader who attended the first closed-door meeting of ECOWAS Heads of State in Abuja in December 2016, where the legality of regional military intervention in The Gambideliberated. I also participated in the decisive Bamako meeting with President-elect Adama Barrow, where the decision to intervene militarily was unanimously endorsed. In Abuja, I was accompanied by Hon. Hamat Bah on behalf of the Coalition. During consultations at Aso Rock, I was summoned alone by the Heads of State to present the legal and political justification for intervention. In Bamako, I joined President-elect Barrow in the critical session where ECOWAS leaders resolved to authorize the use of force to uphold the will of the Gambian people. These engagements, along with numerous bilateral negotiations, were conducted under strict secrecy and delicate diplomacy, entrusted to me with the full authority of then President-elect Barrow. As the first Minister of Interior under the Coalition Government, I was fully privy to the high-level decisions shaping the ECOMIG mission in The Gambia. Abdoulie Sanyang’s claims are, therefore, not only false but also indicative of a troubling propensity for disinformation.

It is both shocking and disappointing that Sanyang would resort to such fabrications. His assertions are reckless, misleading, and without merit. The truth of The Gambia’s transition must not be distorted by fanciful inventions.

Six Defeats Too Many? UDP Cyber Warrior Warns Darboe

Nanama Keita, a UDP cyber warrior known for his open support of Mayor Talib Bensouda’s candidacy as UDP flagbearer, has urged Ousainou Darboe not to contest the presidency in 2026. In a Facebook write-up, Keita stated: “If Ousainou Darboe were my father—and I say this with the utmost respect for a man old enough to be one—I would plead with him not to contest the presidency in 2026.”

He argued that Darboe, a veteran lawyer who rose to become Foreign Minister, Vice President, and at one point the de facto President, has already achieved enough to secure his place in history. According to Keita, Darboe does not need the presidency to validate his legacy, and a continued pursuit of the office could risk overshadowing his accomplishments. Keita warned that another defeat—what would be Darboe’s sixth in three decades—could have damaging consequences for both the UDP and its long-time leader. “If a struggle begins and ends with one individual, then it was never truly a collective struggle—it was always about that individual,” he wrote. However, Keita also noted that the situation could be turned into an opportunity. He suggested that Darboe could strengthen his legacy by focusing on renewal within the UDP, championing a successor, and leading a generational transition. Doing so, he argued, would demonstrate that the UDP is bigger than any one individual and would secure the party’s future beyond 2026. He concluded with a pointed question: Will 2026 be about Darboe himself, or about the future of the UDP?

Lamin J Darboe Slams UDP’s Flag Bearer Process as “Unfair and Undemocratic”

The United Democratic Party’s (UDP) recently launched flag bearer selection for the 2026 presidential race is already mired in controversy, as prominent Gambian lawyer Lamin J Darboe has accused the party of manipulating the process to sideline challengers and shield its leadership from competition. Darboe, who holds both Gambian and British citizenship, disclosed to The Standard that he had intended to vie for the party’s ticket. However, a clause requiring applicants to renounce dual nationality within just 14 days has effectively eliminated his chances. He dismissed the condition as both impractical and unnecessary, given that the presidential polls are more than a year away.

“It is impossible to renounce British citizenship in two weeks. The UDP’s deadline is designed to shut people like me out, not to promote fairness,” Darboe lamented. “Preferential Treatment” for Party LeaderDarboe went further, openly questioning whether the rules are being selectively applied to protect Secretary General and long-time Party Leader Ousainu Darboe. “Are we about to witness preferential treatment for the Party Leader, while ordinary members are trapped by arbitrary conditions?” he asked pointedly. He accused the leadership of sidelining loyal supporters who contribute financially to the party while shielding executives who do little to sustain it. “In 2020, I was abroad in the UK and sent D10,000 for the party congress—twice the contribution of the entire executive committee combined. Yet somehow, loyalty and commitment are measured in ways that exclude people like me,” Darboe fumed. History of Rigged ProcessesThe lawyer reminded Gambians that this is not the first time UDP has betrayed its own democratic rhetoric. He cited the 2021 selection process as a sham. “Four people applied, but only Ousainu Darboe was even given a hearing. The rest of us were ignored. That was not a contest—it was an anointment, in flagrant violation of both UDP rules and democratic principles,” he said. Darboe suggested that the party’s leadership is more interested in preserving its grip on power than fostering genuine competition. “To hear senior figures recently cite my name as an example of UDP democracy is an insult, because what I experienced was the exact opposite,” he added. A Party at a CrossroadsWith the 2026 elections looming, Darboe’s withdrawal highlights a growing rift within the UDP. Once considered the country’s strongest opposition force, the party now faces mounting questions about its credibility, internal democracy, and its willingness to embrace change. For Lamin J Darboe, however, the verdict is clear: “The system is rigged, and I will not lend legitimacy to a process that mocks both fairness and transparency.”

Ex-Military Officer Abdoulie Sanyang Arrested at Banjul Airport

By JarraNews Staff Writer

Banjul, 18th August 2025 – Former military officer Mr. Abdoulie Sanyang was arrested on Sunday night at the Banjul International Airport, security officials have confirmed. The arrest took place between 21:00 and 22:00 hours on 17th August 2025, after his arrival details were flagged through the flight manifest. Mr. Sanyang was initially detained at the Airport Police Station before being handed over to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) and Interpol Bureau for routine background checks. He was later transferred to the Brusubi Police Station, where he is currently in custody. Authorities link his arrest to statements he made during a live appearance on Coffee Time with Peter Gomez on West Coast Radio, aired on 14th August 2025. Officials say the remarks carry serious national security implications. It could be recalled that during the broadcast, Mr. Sanyang claimed he had returned to The Gambia to join the movement known as GALA (Gambians Against Loathed Assets), a pressure group he says is planning demonstrations aimed at removing President Adama Barrow from power before the 2026 presidential elections. "Sanyang claimed he had evidence suggesting that President Adama Barrow’s National People’s Party (NPP) manipulated the 2021 presidential election. He also alleged that the government was behind the attack on Gambia’s paramilitary officers, which left two police officers dead."

Mr. Sanyang also alleged that he was the chief architect of the 2016 Solo Sandeng protest against the former President Yahya Jammeh, as well as the “brain” behind the deployment of ECOMIG Forces in The Gambia. He further declared that he is part of a group prepared to unseat President Barrow. For now, Mr. Sanyang remains in custody at the Brusubi CID, as investigations continue.

Africa at a Crossroads After Alaska Summit: Between Autonomy and Dependency

By Dr. Lang Fafa Dampha

The recent summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska has reshaped global geopolitics in ways that could reverberate far beyond Europe and Asia. Africa, already navigating fragile security landscapes and developmental challenges, now faces fresh uncertainties as global powers recalibrate their strategies. For African nations, the meeting’s implications are more than distant diplomatic maneuvers. The choices made in Washington and Moscow influence aid flows, investment opportunities, security partnerships, and the continent’s role in multilateral institutions. With both the U.S. and Russia intensifying their engagement in Africa—albeit through different means—the continent risks becoming a renewed arena of great-power competition. A Renewed Struggle for Influence The Alaska summit raises the prospect of either heightened rivalry or cautious cooperation between Washington and Moscow over Africa. Russia has expanded its footprint through military ties, private contractors, and resource-driven deals in countries such as Mali, Burkina Faso, and the Central African Republic. These partnerships, while offering immediate security assistance, often spark concerns about governance, sovereignty, and long-term stability. The U.S., meanwhile, has traditionally emphasized counterterrorism, governance reforms, and trade. A shift in Washington’s global posture—either towards deeper engagement or disengagement—could determine whether Africa benefits from renewed investment in health systems, infrastructure, and democratic institutions, or faces declining support at a critical time. Security Vacuums and Russian Opportunism With France’s influence waning in the Sahel and Washington signaling elements of retrenchment, Moscow appears poised to fill security gaps. Its model of offering military support in exchange for access to natural resources has gained traction, though often at the cost of transparency and democratic accountability. Should Western focus on Ukraine diminish, Russia may redirect even greater resources to Africa, reinforcing its influence in fragile states and resource-rich economies alike.

Dr.Lang Fafa Dampha Economic and Diplomatic Fallout The Alaska summit could also shape Africa’s economic trajectory. A thaw in U.S.-Russia tensions may relieve some pressure on African states forced to “choose sides,” giving them more diplomatic flexibility. It could also ease global grain markets, stabilizing food supplies for nations heavily dependent on wheat and fertilizer imports from Russia and Ukraine. Yet, the risks are considerable. Reduced Western pressure on authoritarian regimes could embolden leaders resistant to democratic reforms. Meanwhile, if the U.S. shifts attention away from Africa, critical areas such as healthcare, climate resilience, and education may face funding shortfalls—stalling progress on sustainable development goals. The Risk of Marginalisation As global powers redraw their strategies, Africa faces the danger of being treated as a peripheral player rather than an active stakeholder. Mounting debt, climate shocks, migration pressures, and recurring coups already strain many African governments. Increased reliance on Russia or China for relief may solve short-term crises while deepening long-term dependency. A Moment for African Agency Despite these risks, the Alaska summit presents an opportunity for Africa to redefine its role in global affairs. Strong states such as Nigeria, South Africa, and Algeria—along with the African Union—can seize this moment to demand greater inclusion in global governance, from climate negotiations to trade rules and security frameworks. By strengthening continental unity and prioritizing sovereignty, transparency, and accountable governance, Africa can resist being drawn into proxy rivalries. Instead, it can leverage a multipolar world order to negotiate partnerships on more equitable terms. Conclusion: The Burden of Leadership The Alaska summit underscores a central truth: Africa’s future will not be determined solely by decisions in Washington, Moscow, or Beijing, but by the resolve and vision of African leaders themselves. The continent now stands at a crossroads. Choices made in the coming years—between dependency and autonomy, between short-term deals and long-term reforms—will define whether Africa remains a stage for external rivalries or emerges as a confident actor in its own right. The stakes could not be higher. Without decisive leadership rooted in unity, integrity, and foresight, Africa risks perpetuating cycles of instability and exploitation. But with strategic vision and strong institutions, this moment of global realignment could mark the beginning of a new chapter—one in which Africa asserts, rather than defends, its place in the world.

Her Excellency Mrs. Fatoumatta Bah Barrow – Champion for Women and Children

Yesterday, a new chapter of hope and partnership was written as Her Excellency Mrs. Fatoumatta Bah Barrow, First Lady of The Gambia, graced Birmingham Women and Children’s Hospital with her presence.

From the moment she arrived, her warmth and compassion filled the halls. Guided by the hospital’s Chairman and CEO, Her Excellency walked through the maternity wards, bereavement centres, and neonatal units — meeting the dedicated professionals who work tirelessly to give every mother and child the best start in life. She listened, she asked, and she envisioned how such expertise could be shared to benefit families back home in The Gambia.

This visit was more than a tour; it was a heartfelt mission. In partnership with the Fulbe Africa U.K. Association and the Gambian Mission, Her Excellency led meaningful discussions on building lasting ties between our two nations’ healthcare systems.

Her message was clear and inspiring: when governments, communities, and partners unite, the power to transform lives becomes unstoppable.

Her Excellency continues to be a voice for the most vulnerable — a First Lady whose vision for healthier mothers and children extends far beyond borders.

AU Urged to Put African Languages and Culture at the Heart of Integration

Dr.Lang Fafa Dampha

A new policy call warns that Africa’s unity project will falter unless the African Union embeds the continent’s own languages, cultural values, and indigenous knowledge into governance, education, and development. Experts say that mother-tongue learning, grassroots engagement, and traditional knowledge systems are vital for sustainable growth—key goals under Agenda 2063. From the early days of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) to the African Union (AU) of today, Africa’s integration drive has too often sidelined its greatest assets—its languages, cultures, and indigenous knowledge systems—in favour of externally imported models of governance and development. While initiatives such as the Inter-African Bureau of Languages and the African Academy of Languages were created to promote African languages as tools of unity, their impact has been hampered by limited institutional commitment and resources. This neglect, rooted in colonial legacies, has left governance, education, and economic planning disconnected from Africa’s diverse identities and priorities. Experts argue that genuine integration demands a fundamental shift: embedding African languages and cultural values at the heart of policy, governance, and education. Mother-tongue instruction, for instance, boosts learning outcomes and civic participation, while cultural industries—such as Nollywood and African music—generate jobs, strengthen identity, and project African creativity globally. Indigenous knowledge, from traditional farming to water conservation, offers proven, sustainable solutions to local challenges. When integrated with modern science and supported by African research institutions, these systems can drive innovation and resilience. Grassroots participation is equally critical. Policies co-designed with communities, in their own languages, ensure local ownership, enhance social cohesion, and align development with lived realities—key goals under the AU’s Agenda 2063. As Ghana’s first president, Kwame Nkrumah, warned, Africa’s political and economic liberation cannot be complete without cultural revival. For the AU, reclaiming and institutionalising Africa’s languages, cultural values, and indigenous knowledge is not symbolic—it is the cornerstone of a self-determined, sustainable, and united future.

Tragic Infant Death in Wellingara Sparks Renewed Calls to End FGM

By JarraNews Staff Writer

WELLINGARA — The death of a one-month-old baby girl in Wellingara, allegedly linked to complications from Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), has prompted fresh calls for justice and stronger protections for children in The Gambia. In a statement expressing “profound sorrow and indignation,” a community leader and National Assembly Member for Old Yundum condemned the incident, describing it as “a painful reminder of the urgent need to protect our children from harmful practices that rob them of their health, dignity, and future.” The lawmaker emphasized that opposition to FGM does not equate to opposition to religion or culture. “I deeply respect the rich traditions and spiritual values that shape our communities,” the statement read. “However, culture must never be used to justify violence, and faith must never be distorted to permit harm.” FGM has been banned in The Gambia since 2015, and the country is a signatory to several international agreements that obligate it to protect girls from such practices, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, and the Maputo Protocol. The legislator urged authorities to conduct a full investigation into the child’s death and to prosecute anyone found responsible. “If it is confirmed that FGM contributed to the death of this one-month-old girl, accountability must be pursued swiftly and with unwavering integrity,” the statement continued. “As both a resident of Wellingara and the elected representative of the people of Old Yundum, I bear a profound moral responsibility to speak on behalf of the voiceless and stand in defense of the most vulnerable among us,” the lawmaker said, adding that the tragedy should serve as “a turning point” in the fight to eradicate FGM. “The loss of this innocent child must not be forgotten,” the statement concluded. “Our nation must renew its unwavering commitment to protecting every child’s right to life, safety, and dignity.”

A Direct Rebuttal to Dr. Lamin Manneh: The Right Meaning of “Militia”

By Yaya Dampha Coordinator NPP Diaspora Sweden

Dr. Manneh, before you dismiss the term “militia” as a dangerous fabrication, it is important to ground this discussion in facts, law, and the plain meaning of words. The term “militia” is not a vague political insult — it has a clear and universally understood meaning: a group of civilians organized to act like an armed or enforcement body outside the official state security apparatus, often self-appointed to enforce laws or protect political interests.

Militias may or may not carry firearms — what defines them is that they operate outside state authority, taking law enforcement into their own hands.

The 2021 Pre-Election Reality Before the 2021 presidential election, the United Democratic Party (UDP), through its senior official Ebrima Dibba, formed and led a squad of young men and women touring the country. These groups visited communities with the stated purpose of stopping certain individuals from registering as voters — people the UDP believed were “not Gambians.”

This action was not backed by a court order. It was not sanctioned by the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC). It was not conducted by the police, immigration, or any legal body mandated to determine citizenship or voter eligibility. Yet The Gambia’s electoral laws already provide: A clear process to challenge voter eligibility during registration. The establishment of a Revising Court by the IEC to adjudicate disputes over eligibility. By bypassing this legal process and physically intervening in communities to decide who should or should not be registered, these UDP youth squads acted as self-appointed enforcers of the law. That is, by definition, militia behaviour.

Why This Matters Dr. Manneh, the danger here is not in using the word “militia,” but in normalizing political groups taking over functions reserved for state institutions. Whether armed or unarmed, once a political party mobilizes its own force to enforce its own interpretation of the law, it undermines both the constitution and the electoral process. To deny this reality is to rewrite history. Gambians witnessed it. They saw groups moving from village to village in the name of “preventing fraud,” intimidating would-be registrants, and creating a climate of fear. No amount of press conferences or legal threats will erase that collective memory. Conclusion The truth is simple: If a group is organized by a political party, operates outside the law, and enforces political objectives through intimidation — it is a militia. What happened in 2021 under Ebrima Dibba’s leadership meets that definition. Refuting this with rhetoric instead of facts only deepens public mistrust. Gambia’s democracy does not need private enforcement squads, no matter which party they serve. It needs parties that trust the law, not bypass it.