Jarra news
Wednesday, November 19, 2025
Editorial: The Extravagant Travels of Former Auditor General Momodou Ceesay
MADI Accuses ECOWAS Commission President of Abuse of Office, Warns of Diplomatic Fallout
Tuesday, November 18, 2025
GRTS Welcomes AUB Delegation as Plans for 2026 Continental Gathering Intensify
By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter, Banjul
A high-level delegation from the African Union of Broadcasting (AUB), led by its Director General, Mr. Gregoire Ndjaka, is currently in The Gambia as guests of the Gambia Radio and Television Service (GRTS).
Mr. Ndjaka is accompanied by Ms. Rokehya Ndiaye, the AUB’s Head of Member Relations. The visiting team is in the country to engage government officials and the GRTS leadership on preparations for the 2026 AUB General Assembly, scheduled to take place in Banjul.
During their mission, the delegation held a series of consultative meetings with the Minister of Information, Media, and Broadcasting Services. They also met with GRTS Director General, Mr. Abdoulie Sey, and senior management of the national broadcaster to review initial planning requirements for the continental gathering.
As part of their assessment, the team conducted site visits to key hospitality and conference facilities, including the Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara International Conference Centre in Bijilo. They later held discussions with members of the GRTS Board of Directors, represented by Vice Chair Mr. Kemo Conteh.
The 2026 General Assembly will mark the first time The Gambia hosts an AUB event—an important milestone that underscores GRTS’s efforts to strengthen its visibility within Africa’s broadcasting landscape.
Background on the African Union of Broadcasting (AUB)
Established in the early 1960s under its former name URTNA, the African Union of Broadcasting is the continent’s principal professional body for national radio and television organisations. It was restructured and renamed AUB in 2006 to adapt to modern broadcasting needs and expand cooperation across African media houses.
AUB works to promote collaboration among broadcasters, facilitate content exchange, negotiate affordable satellite transmission rates, and support training and professional development across the sector. It also represents African broadcasters in international forums and plays a key role in advocating for media rights, technological advancement, and fair access to global broadcast opportunities.Today, the organisation brings together public and private broadcasters from across Africa, united by the mission of strengthening the continent’s media landscape and projecting a more authentic African narrative to global audiences.
Monday, November 17, 2025
Disability Act Now Fully Enforced: Public Warned of Fines and Jail Terms
Friday, November 14, 2025
STATE MOVES TO STRIKE OUT EX-AUDITOR GENERAL’S REPLY IN SUPREME COURT SHOWDOWN
By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter, Banjul
The State, represented by the Solicitor General and Legal Secretary, has filed a strong objection before the Supreme Court seeking to strike out the reply submitted by former Auditor General Modou Ceesay in his ongoing constitutional suit.
Mr. Ceesay is challenging what he describes as his forceful removal from office, naming the Attorney General, the Inspector General of Police, and Cherno Alieu Sowe as the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants, respectively.
In a “Brief of Argument on Notice of Objection” dated 12 November 2025, counsel for the 1st and 2nd defendants asked the Supreme Court to strike out parts—or the entirety—of Mr. Ceesay’s “Reply to Defendants’ Statement of Case,” arguing it is procedurally defective and substantively improper.
Four Grounds of Objection
The State’s objection rests on four principal arguments:
1. No Provision Exists for Filing a Reply
The Solicitor General argued that the Supreme Court Rules do not provide for a plaintiff to file a reply to a defendant’s statement of case. He noted that such a document is unnecessary and improperly introduces matters not relevant to the constitutional issues before the court.
2. Lack of Mandatory Verification
The Solicitor General submitted that Mr. Ceesay’s reply is incompetent because it was not verified by an affidavit, contrary to Rules 46(2)(a) and 46(2)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules. He stressed that any statement of case lacking verification cannot serve as evidence or be relied upon during trial.
3. Introduction of New and Irrelevant Issues
The State further contended that the reply improperly introduces new issues and attaches annexures—such as an audit report—that are unnecessary for resolving the constitutional questions raised in the suit. This, according to the Solicitor General, risks complicating matters before the court.
4. Paragraph 19 Described as Unclear and Irrelevant
Particular concern was raised regarding Paragraph 19 of the reply, which spans nearly two pages. The Solicitor General described the paragraph as unclear, irrelevant, and difficult to respond to, urging the court to strike it out.
State’s Prayer Before the Court
The Solicitor General urged the Supreme Court to strike out the entire reply for failing to comply with procedural requirements.
Alternatively, should the court choose to strike out only Paragraph 19 and order an amendment, the State requested leave to file a rejoinder responding to any amended portions of the document.
The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the objection in due course as the high-stakes constitutional battle continues.
Editor’s Note:
The Gambia operates a procedural legal system in which strict adherence to court rules is essential. All filings—including statements of case, replies, and supporting evidence—must comply with established procedures to ensure fairness, clarity, and efficient determination of matters before the courts. Documents that are not properly verified or filed in accordance with the rules may be struck out, and in some instances, entire cases can be dismissed for procedural irregularities. Proper procedure remains a cornerstone of the justice system and a safeguard for the integrity of judicial proceedings.