Journalism in The Gambia On Life Support

From Watchdogs to Publicists: The Collapse of Gambian Journalism; Alagi Yorro Jallow

Fatoumatta: The lifeblood of any democracy lies in its media—a press that informs, educates, and holds power to account. In The Gambia, this lifeblood is critically endangered. Journalism, once a beacon of truth and accountability, stands on the precipice of irrelevance. Online media platforms have forsaken Gambian stories and priorities, leaving citizens adrift and democracy vulnerable. If journalism in The Gambia is not restored to its rightful role, the nation risks losing the very foundation of its democratic governance. Journalism in The Gambia is not just struggling; it is on life support. The shift to online platforms has brought with it a collapse in ethical standards. Many outlets now recycle content from Senegalese newspapers or irrelevant sources, neglecting critical Gambian issues and failing to hold the government accountable. The core principles of journalism—informing, educating, and entertaining the public—have been abandoned. Instead, these platforms have morphed into public relations machines for politicians and celebrities. Gambian stories are overshadowed by an overwhelming focus on Senegalese news, particularly figures like Ousmane Sonko and other key officials. This disproportionate coverage of Senegalese affairs raises serious concerns. While Senegal boasts over 300 newspapers and radio stations that rarely cover Gambian issues, Gambian media inexplicably prioritizes Senegal over its own pressing matters. This imbalance prompts questions about potential affiliations and external influences, particularly with organizations like Pastef. Gambian journalists must ask themselves: why act as propagandists for foreign political figures while neglecting their own nation’s needs?

The integrity of a democracy hinges on the strength of an independent press. In The Gambia, where freedom of expression is constitutionally guaranteed, the media has a responsibility to prioritize Gambian issues, especially with elections on the horizon. Local journalism is not just a public service; it is a democratic necessity. It bridges community divides, amplifies diverse voices, and clarifies how policies impact citizens' lives. It fosters political engagement, disseminates critical information during crises, and cultivates a strong local identity. The stakes for local journalism in The Gambia have never been higher. Without a revitalized press, the nation risks deepening political divides, eroding government accountability, and undermining democratic values. The decline of local news is insidious, fostering polarization, reducing voter turnout, and weakening the very fabric of democracy. Local journalism is not just important; it is indispensable. It empowers communities to understand the significance of local elections, encourages civic engagement, and ensures public officials are held accountable. Moreover, the lack of professional training among many editors and journalists in Gambian online media is a glaring issue. Many of these individuals are not trained journalists but proofreaders who have been invited into newsrooms without the necessary skills or ethical grounding. This lack of professionalism further erodes the quality of reporting and undermines public trust in the media. The Gambian media must also reflect on the disparity in coverage. How much attention does Senegalese media give to Gambian issues? The answer is stark: virtually none. Yet Gambian outlets devote significant resources to covering Senegalese affairs, particularly since the new government came to power last year. This raises serious questions about priorities and motives. Gambian journalists must realign their focus, ensuring that their reporting serves the interests of Gambians, not foreign political agendas. The future of democracy in The Gambia hangs in the balance. Without immediate efforts to restore the integrity of local journalism, the nation faces a chilling reality—a democracy without a voice. Fatoumatta: A democracy without a voice is a nation lost. Gambian journalists must rise above mediocrity, prioritizing Gambian narratives over foreign agendas. The future demands ethical, professional, and independent reporting to serve the people of this country. Anything less condemns The Gambia to an era where voices of accountability are replaced by echoes of external propaganda. The urgency is clear: journalism must reclaim its role as democracy's trusted ally. The moment to act is now—before the light of democracy fades into silence.

President Barrow Lacks Effective Advisers And Ministers To Counter Fake news

A Call for Transformation: Enhancing Leadership and Effective Public Communication Strategies in President Barrow's Administration. By Alagi Yorro Jallow

President Adama Barrow's administration stands at a crossroads, where the decisions made today will shape the nation's trajectory for years to come. The challenges facing his government—ranging from incompetence within the cabinet to the inability to counter misinformation—demand bold and decisive action. To restore public trust and ensure effective governance, the President must reconsider his team of ministers and advisers, prioritizing competence, accountability, and strategic communication. The current cabinet and advisory team have failed to rise to the occasion, demonstrating a lack of ambition and initiative that has hindered progress. Ministers cannot afford to adopt a passive "spare tire" mentality; their shortcomings have directly contributed to the administration's struggles. Unlike Barack Obama, who benefited from the unwavering commitment and strategic brilliance of David Axelrod, President Barrow lacks a team of advisers who can provide the same level of dedication and expertise. This absence has left the administration without the intellectual depth and strategic vision necessary to navigate complex challenges effectively. A critical area of concern is the government's outdated approach to public policy communication. The reliance on the Ministry of Information, an institution rooted in propaganda practices of a bygone era, is counterproductive. Modern governance demands transparent and strategic communication frameworks that engage the public and counter misinformation effectively. The government's failure to adapt to these demands has left it vulnerable to misinformation and public skepticism.

The recent fake news saga involving Kazakhstan and the manipulated trade deal data concerning The Gambia underscores the administration's inability to counter misinformation effectively. Fifth-columnists, including a former Yahya Jammeh-appointed ambassador and hired propagandists, have weaponized their online platforms to amplify falsehoods, targeting vulnerable populations. Despite efforts by concerned Gambian intellectuals to debunk these lies, the critics persist in spreading misinformation, exploiting the government's lack of intellectual depth and strategic communication capabilities. The decision to allocate 40 million dalasi to private media in an attempt to control narratives has proven to be a misguided and wasteful endeavor. Ironically, some of the very media outlets contracted for this purpose have turned against the administration, further complicating the government's efforts to manage its public image. Meanwhile, the chaotic social media landscape remains dominated by self-proclaimed activists, fifth-columnists, and hired propagandists, who continue to undermine the administration's credibility.

Fatoumatta: The inability of educated individuals within the government and the ruling NPP to effectively defend the administration against these adversaries is a glaring weakness. A comprehensive overhaul of the communication strategy is essential. This includes dismantling outdated structures like the Ministry of Information and replacing them with modern, transparent, and proactive communication frameworks. The government must prioritize building a team of skilled communicators who can effectively articulate its vision, counter misinformation, and engage with the public in a meaningful way. President Barrow must also resist undue influence from the party secretariat. The NPP party leadership has become consumed by internal conflicts and self-serving agendas, which have undermined the administration's effectiveness. Alarmingly, some beneficiaries of the 40 million dalasi contract have turned against the administration, highlighting the futility of such expenditures. In conclusion, President Barrow must take bold and decisive steps to address these challenges. By reshuffling the cabinet and advisory team, dismantling outdated communication structures, and investing in a modern and strategic public policy communication system, the administration can overcome its current weaknesses and pave the way for a brighter future. The government must adapt to the demands of the digital age and prioritize transparency, accountability, and progress to regain the trust and support of the people.

The Radicalised Partisan Imams In the Gambia

Democratic Responsibility and Reconciliation: The Role of Radicalized Partisan Imams in The Gambia’s Path to Unity and Healing.

Alagie Yerro Jallow In the vibrant landscape of Gambian democracy, religious leaders hold immense influence, both as moral guides and community pillars. As the nation continues its journey of healing and progress, the recent remarks of Imam Darou Sanyang—likening President Barrow to Pharaoh—bring into sharp focus the delicate balance between freedom of expression and responsible leadership. This controversy stems from the twisting of President Barrow’s "Meet the Banjul Elders" speech on Eid, where his observations about practices in other nations were misconstrued to fit critics’ personal narratives. Such distortions not only distract from the true intent of his message but also fuel unnecessary division. While these critiques are emblematic of the democratic freedoms cherished in The Gambia, they also highlight the urgency of using these freedoms to unite rather than divide. The mosque, a place of spiritual solace, should never become a stage for tribal politics or populist rhetoric. Instead, imams must rise above partisan agendas, channeling their influence toward fostering reconciliation, promoting civic education, and sustaining the democratic ideals that underpin The Gambia’s future. The Gambia stands at a pivotal moment in its democratic journey, navigating the challenges of healing from decades of authoritarian rule while fostering an inclusive society. Recent statements by some imams, particularly Imam Darou Sanyang, have ignited fierce debates. His comparison of President Barrow to Pharaoh, accusing him of pursuing dictatorial tendencies, underscores a broader issue: the role of religious leaders in a democratic society. While such bold criticisms might find a platform in The Gambia’s democracy, they would be inconceivable in many Islamic states where imams face tighter restrictions. This stark contrast highlights both the freedoms of democracy and the responsibilities that come with it. In his inflammatory remarks, Imam Sanyang reflects frustrations that might resonate with certain factions, but his language serves as a striking example of the freedom of expression afforded by democracy. In other Islamic nations, imams are often subject to strict governmental oversight, with sermons monitored or pre-approved to prevent dissent or divisive rhetoric. Such a system, though limiting, seeks to maintain harmony and prevent religious platforms from being politicized. In The Gambia, however, democracy has ushered in an era where imams can speak freely, even when their messages verge on the incendiary. Yet, this liberty is being tested when religious leaders cross the line into populist politics and tribal rhetoric. During Yahya Jammeh's despotic rule, many of these voices were notably absent. Their silence during that time—and their newfound outspokenness now—raises questions about the true motivations behind their critiques. Are these efforts truly aimed at promoting justice and accountability, or are they exploiting democracy for partisan or tribal agendas?

Imams occupy a vital space in Gambian society, serving as moral guides and community leaders. At a time when the nation needs healing from its past divisions, their sermons should prioritize messages of unity, reconciliation, and peace. The platform of the mosque is sacred and should not be used for political campaigning or tribal rhetoric. This misuse not only undermines the sanctity of religion but also exacerbates societal divisions, hindering the progress that democracy seeks to achieve. In many Islamic societies, imams are expected to rise above partisanship, focusing instead on the spiritual and moral upliftment of their communities. While President Barrow’s remarks about imams in other nations were misconstrued, they serve as an important reminder of the delicate balance between religious freedom and social responsibility. His comments were not a call for censorship but an observation of global practices, distorted by critics for political gain. Fatoumatta: Democracy guarantees freedom of speech and association, but these freedoms must be exercised responsibly. If imams wish to engage in politics, the constitution allows them to do so transparently by joining or forming political parties. However, hiding behind the pulpit to propagate partisan or tribal agendas is a betrayal of their spiritual mandate. Using inflammatory rhetoric, such as likening a democratically elected president to Pharaoh, risks eroding the very democratic principles that allow such expressions to exist. The government, in collaboration with the Supreme Islamic Council and the Ministry of Religious Affairs, has a responsibility to establish clear guidelines for religious leaders. These bodies can provide structured channels for imams to voice their concerns, ensuring that disagreements are addressed constructively rather than through divisive rhetoric. Civic education campaigns could also play a critical role, empowering both religious leaders and their congregations with the knowledge to navigate democracy responsibly.

The Gambia’s democracy is a precious achievement, and its preservation requires collective effort. Imams, as custodians of moral and spiritual guidance, have a unique opportunity to complement government efforts in fostering an informed, united, and active citizenry. By focusing their sermons on civic education, reconciliation, and global issues such as the plight of Palestinians or the suffering in Gaza, imams can redirect their influence toward causes that inspire solidarity rather than discord. Fatoumatta: Ultimately, this is not about silencing religious leaders but about encouraging them to use their powerful platforms for the greater good. The Gambia’s journey toward healing and progress depends on the collective commitment of all its leaders—religious, political, and civic—to uphold the principles of justice, unity, and democracy.

Response To Ndey Jobarteh

Dear Ndey I am responding to your critique in my capacity as NPP Diaspora Group Coordinator and a proud member of the NPP, the party that elected President Barrow to office. Your recent comments regarding President Barrow are indeed striking, particularly given your complete silence during the oppressive years of the Jammeh dictatorship. It’s disheartening to see someone who danced in vibrant traditional attire while our people suffered under tyranny now take a radical stance against the very democracy we fought to attain.

You’ve been noticeably absent from the struggle when our compatriots faced killings and torture, choosing instead to engage in cultural activities while the Gambian people endured unimaginable hardship. The contrast between your past actions and your current criticisms raises questions about your commitment to the welfare of our nation and its citizens. It’s no secret that your recent radicalization seems rooted in personal disappointment—particularly after your hopes of securing a job or a consulate position in Scandinavia fell through. You and your group attempted to organize a "Gambian House," which was met with rightful scrutiny from the Norwegian government, highlighting that you were not qualified for such a role. It’s troubling to see how dashed ambitions have led you to engage in undermining our government and promoting discontent among the electorate Your aim appears to create discord, and we must draw a line at allowing anyone to poison the minds of our people for personal gain. President Barrow’s statements have been in line with what many see as valid expressions of the challenges we face today. He is not threatening anyone; rather, he is calling attention to the misuse of democracy that has turned many into loud activists with little regard for constructive dialogue. While we appreciate your past contributions, we will not tolerate attempts to distort the reality of our democratic progress in the Gambia or attacks on PresidentAdamaBarrow who is working tirelessly to maintain peace and stability. Yes, President Barrow has his faults, as do all leaders, but he has brought us a greater measure of freedom compared to the days of oppression we once lived through. As encouraged as you might feel to amplify dissent, we—and many others—will steadfastly defend our party and our president against the fabrications and divisive rhetoric that threaten to tear apart the fabric of our democracy. peace time heroes will not be allow to control the narratives of our struggle posing as if they were there during the dark days. Eid Mubarak to you all. Yaya Dampha NPP Coordinator in the Diaspora

Tribute To Retired General Lamin Bojang A Soldier with Difference

A Tribute to Retired General Lamin Bojang: A Life of Service and Dedication Inna illahi wa inna illahi Rajoun. Alagi Yorro Jallow The Gambia mourns the loss of one of its most distinguished sons, Retired General Lamin Bojang, whose passing marks the end of a remarkable journey defined by service, leadership, and unwavering commitment to his nation. General Bojang was not only a decorated military officer but also a diplomat and a political leader who dedicated his life to the betterment of his country and its people.

As a military officer, General Bojang exemplified discipline, courage, and integrity. His years of service in the armed forces were marked by a steadfast dedication to duty and a deep sense of patriotism. He was a leader who inspired those under his command, earning their respect and admiration through his unwavering principles and commitment to excellence. Beyond his military career, General Bojang transitioned into the political arena, where he served as the party leader and Secretary General of the Alliance for National Reorientation and Development (ANRD). In this role, he championed the values of unity, progress, and national development, striving to create a brighter future for The Gambia. His vision for the nation was one of inclusivity and reorientation, where every citizen could contribute to the collective growth and prosperity of the country. As a diplomat, General Bojang represented The Gambia with distinction in Guinea Bissau. His tenure as a diplomat was a testament to his ability to build bridges and foster meaningful relationships, reflecting his deep understanding of the importance of diplomacy in advancing national interests. General Bojang's life was not only one of public service but also of personal devotion. His recent return to The Gambia to observe Laylatul Qadr with his family underscores his commitment to his faith and his loved ones. It is a poignant reminder of the values that guided his life—faith, family, and service.

The passing of General Bojang is a profound loss for The Gambia. He leaves behind a legacy of leadership, dedication, and an unwavering commitment to the ideals of service and nation-building. His contributions to the military, politics, and diplomacy will be remembered as a testament to his enduring love for his country. As we bid farewell to this extraordinary leader, let us honor his memory by upholding the values he stood for and striving to build the nation he envisioned. May his soul rest in eternal peace, and may his family find solace in the knowledge that his life was one of profound impact and purpose. Rest in peace, Retired General Lamin Bojang. Your legacy will forever remain etched in the hearts of those you served and inspired. May Allah grant him Alijaanh Firdausi.

The Duality of Sergeant Essa Bokar Sey's Critiques and Career

By Alagi Yorro Jallow Sergeant Essa Bokar Sey’s career trajectory and his pattern of critique present a striking irony. Historically, Sey has maintained silence while holding government appointments, but becomes a vocal critic when excluded from such roles. His primary arguments focus on government inefficiency and lethargy, which he attributes to nepotism and loyalty-based appointments rather than merit. Yet, his own rise to prominence under former dictator Yahya Jammeh underscores his connection to the very system he criticizes.

As a member of the Gendarmerie and a close ally of Jammeh, Sey was appointed ambassador to global powerhouses such as China, France, and the United States. This appointment came despite lacking a university degree or credentials befitting an ambassador. These ambassadorial roles, typically reserved for higher-ranking officials with proven expertise, highlight the prevalence of nepotism and loyalty over merit during Jammeh's regime. Sey’s diplomatic career not only exemplifies this system but also raises questions about the sincerity of his current critiques. In his public statements and social media posts, Sey frequently decries the detrimental effects of favoritism and inefficiency in civil service appointments. He has argued that these practices result in mismatched roles, leading to systemic dysfunction. However, the paradox of his critiques lies in his own history of benefiting from these very dynamics. His ambassadorial appointment under Jammeh—a product of personal connection rather than merit—exemplifies the system’s flaws.

This duality is emblematic of a broader phenomenon within governance: the control of narratives by former enablers of oppressive systems. Critics who rise through nepotism and later denounce the system often undermine the credibility of their arguments. Constructive criticism is essential for accountability and progress, but its integrity is compromised when it is wielded as a tool for personal gain or political leverage. In The Gambia, the dynamics of criticism and governance remain complex. Genuine accountability requires consistency and a commitment to principles over self-interest. The evolving narratives of individuals like Sergeant Essa Bokar Sey demonstrate the urgent need for systemic reform, rooted in merit-based recruitment and governance that prioritizes the common good over personal loyalty.

Editorial MCA's Vigilant Governance: A Milestone in Gambian Public Health

By Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: In a monumental victory for public health, the Ministry of Health and its Medicines Control Agency (MCA) have once again reaffirmed their unyielding dedication to the well-being of Gambians. Their bold decision to temporarily close Opticalia’s Senegambia branch following a routine inspection that uncovered unlicensed eye-drop bottles sends a powerful message: the health and safety of Gambians are of the utmost importance. This rapid response not only prioritizes consumer safety but also underscores a commitment to ensuring that the welfare of the Gambian population is absolutely non-negotiable. Dr. Essa Marena, the MCA’s Executive Director, confirmed that the inspection uncovered drugs imported without the necessary approval or licensing, in flagrant violation of our stringent regulations. In response, the MCA swiftly seized these unauthorized products and has signaled that sanctions—ranging from administrative fines to possible prosecution—will follow, depending on Opticalia’s response. This bold intervention is not merely an act of regulatory compliance; it is a safeguard against harm—a shining example of proactive vigilance that prevents potential disasters before they unfold. In a marketplace where unapproved drugs can often masquerade as safe, the MCA’s rigorous oversight ensures that only the highest standards of quality, safety, and efficacy prevail. Coupled with the broader “Unapproved Drugs Initiative,” which seeks to purge our market of substandard and dangerous medications, these actions reinforce the foundation of a secure healthcare system. They also serve as a poignant reminder that the risks of unregulated substances are too dire to ignore—a lesson that history has etched deeply in our collective memory. The memory of the tragic cough syrup crisis, which claimed the lives of an estimated 66 Gambian children due to toxic chemical contamination, looms large. All children affected suffered acute kidney damage and an inability to urinate, prompting intervention by the World Health Organization (WHO) when medical officials observed a surge in such cases among children under five in late July 2022. The crisis underscored the devastating consequences of negligence and inadequate oversight in drug importation and distribution. Through these efforts, pharmacists and healthcare professionals are reminded to exercise due diligence, ensuring that only verified and approved medicines reach the hands of the public. With informal markets sometimes circulating potentially perilous products, the MCA’s preemptive stance is not only timely but vital to safeguarding our communities. Fatoumatta: The MCA’s resolute initiative in acting against Opticalia epitomizes the kind of leadership that protects our citizens from negligence and greed. It is a call to action—a message that all Gambians can find solace in knowing that their health is defended by institutions ready to act decisively in the face of danger.The Ministry of Health and MCA’s recent action against Opticalia demonstrates their commitment to protecting Gambians from harm and preserving public trust. This level of accountability, combined with ongoing reforms and international support, can pave the way for safer healthcare systems in The Gambia. Gambians deserve nothing less than the utmost dedication to their well-being.

The Rise of The Fift Columnists A New Threat To The Gambia

By Alagi Yorro Jallow A Dire Threat to the Future of Gambian Democracy. The Gambia’s transition from dictatorship to democracy stands as an inspiring symbol of hope and resilience. The peaceful ousting of Yahya Jammeh’s oppressive regime showcased the power of citizens uniting to reclaim their voices and assert their democratic rights. However, democracy is not merely a destination; it demands continual engagement, vigilance, and unwavering commitment to its core principles. Today, The Gambia confronts a new and insidious threat to its hard-won progress—the rise of fifth columnists. Fifth columnists are individuals or groups who operate secretly within a nation, organization, or institution to sabotage and destabilize it, often serving the interests of external adversaries. They employ various subversive tactics, including espionage, sabotage, propaganda, and misinformation campaigns, with the ultimate goal of undermining the very foundation of their target. Their covert operations, both online and offline, are designed to incite public outrage, deepen societal divisions, foment ethnic or ideological tensions, and erode trust in democratic institutions. In The Gambia, the term “fifth columnist” has increasingly become a rallying cry, signaling a growing awareness of the internal threats facing the nation’s emerging democracy. These subversive actors exploit weaknesses within the system to advance their own agendas, often using strategies that incite toxic populism, disseminate falsehoods, and manipulate public sentiment. The consequences of their actions can be politically devastating, sowing discord and paving the way for regime instability and potential upheaval. Their methods are not just damaging; they are a harbinger of significant societal and political turmoil. Fatoumatta: The phrase "fifth column" has its roots in the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), when Nationalist General Emilio Mola infamously declared that, as his four columns of troops marched toward Madrid, a "fifth column" of insurgents and sympathizers within the city would rise to support them. Although the actual impact of these insurgents remains debated, the term has since become synonymous with internal betrayal and the peril of subversion from within. Throughout history, the concept of a fifth column has been applied to various political and social contexts. During World War II, fears of infiltration led to widespread paranoia and, tragically, unjust persecution, as seen in the internment of Japanese Americans in the U.S.

Today, the term has evolved to encompass a new reality, highlighting internal threats within politics, governance, and even the corporate sector. In the digital age, fifth columnists extend their reach beyond physical infiltration; they navigate the online realm, harnessing the power of social media and digital platforms to disseminate disinformation, sow discord, and undermine established institutions. In The Gambia, we witness this phenomenon manifesting through unverified reports and anonymous articles crafted to incite public fury and delegitimize credible institutions. The motivations behind these efforts are evident—destabilization and exploitation for political or ideological gain. Cloaked in the guise of activism or journalism, fifth columnists exploit the trust of the public and the freedoms safeguarded by democracy. Their true aim is not to promote the common good; rather, they seek to serve hidden agendas aligned with personal or political ambitions. By spreading false narratives and igniting division, they erode public confidence in the very institutions that uphold democracy. This calculated chaos creates a fertile ground for instability, undermining the democratic progress that Gambians have strived to achieve. It is imperative that the citizens of The Gambia remain vigilant and united against this new threat. The survival of democracy depends on our collective resolve to stand against those who seek to undermine it. Together, we must protect the hard-fought gains of our democratic journey and ensure that the spirit of resilience and hope continues to shine brightly in our nation. Fatoumatta: Figures like George Christensen and Swaebou Conateh, along with other dedicated independent journalists, stand as exemplars of integrity in the ongoing fight for democracy. Christensen’s fearless reporting during critical moments, such as the April 2000 student demonstrations, and Conateh’s steadfast commitment to the truth serve as powerful reminders of the essential role that genuine journalism plays in unifying society. Their legacies starkly contrast with those of fifth columnists—individuals who betray the foundational trust that journalism and activism are meant to uphold. In our digital age, the reach and impact of these fifth columnists have expanded exponentially. They adeptly harness social media and online platforms to disseminate disinformation on a staggering scale. Anonymous articles and unverified stories spread rapidly, igniting public outrage and deepening ethnic and political divisions. These are not mere side effects of political discourse; they are deliberate efforts to distort public perception and destabilize governance. Modern democracies are grappling with severe security threats—misinformation, political subversion, and social unrest—that often reflect the manipulative tactics of fifth column activities. These crises rarely occur by chance; they are orchestrated by unseen actors who exploit situations for their political advantage. In The Gambia, this alarming trend is increasingly clear, as the rampant spread of unverified information and incendiary rhetoric erodes national unity and undermines trust in our leaders. Fifth columnists systematically exploit the weaknesses of digital platforms, amplifying their divisive narratives and distorting public discourse. Their strategies not only undermine confidence in democratic institutions but also erode the very foundations of our society, making our institutions more vulnerable to collapse. Such actions pose a grave threat to the hard-won progress in democracy, press freedom, and social cohesion that we have strived to achieve. For Gambians, this presents a critical and urgent challenge: how do we safeguard our democracy from those who seek to exploit it? The answer lies in vigilance and accountability. We must question the motives of those who claim to champion our causes. True activists and journalists stand firm on the principles of truth, justice, and societal advancement, while fifth columnists forsake these ideals, using them merely as a disguise for their subversive agendas. The rise of the fifth columnist in The Gambia is a sobering reminder of how fragile our democratic progress can be. To protect our democracy and ensure social cohesion, we must remain resolute against these internal threats. Identifying their tactics and exposing their motives are crucial steps in diminishing their influence. As a nation, we must reaffirm our steadfast commitment to transparency and accountability, along with the values that sustain our democracy. Let us truly “beware the Ides of March.” This phrase serves not only as a historical cautionary reminder but as a clarion call to action—an urgent plea to defend the hard-won successes of our democratic journey. This is a defining moment for The Gambia. The freedoms and rights we have gained after enduring years of oppression must not be wasted; they must be fiercely protected. Fatoumatta: By uniting against fifth columnists and recommitting ourselves to the principles of democracy, we can secure a brighter future. Let this be a rallying cry for all Gambians—a powerful acknowledgment that the work of democracy is never complete and that its protection demands our collective responsibility.

POLICE RESPOND TO ARMED ROBBERY IN BALLANGHAR, CRR - SUSPECT IN CUSTODY

The Police in CRR responded swiftly to an alleged armed robbery involving two shops, Hadim Touray’s and at a Mauritanian shop in Ballanghar Kerr Nderry, CRR, on the evening of March 22, 2025. The timely response and coordination by the Police and regional sister forces, along with the support and cooperation from the people of Ballanghar, were instrumental in containing the incident and apprehending one of the suspects. The Gambia Police Force commends the solidarity demonstrated by the community of Ballanghar. During the confrontation, one suspect, identified as Yerro Sheikh Sowe (Senegalese, from Rosso, Senegal), sustained a gunshot wound and was stabilized at Kaur Health Centre before being transferred to Farafenni General Hospital, where he was later pronounced dead. Another suspect, Amadou Bah (Senegalese, from Sare Wurry), was apprehended by villagers during a hot pursuit. A bag containing D29,910 and 93,000 CFA was recovered from him. Amadou Bah admitted being part of the armed robbery along with three other fugitives, all of whom are Senegalese nationals. According to Amadou Bah, the rifle (hunting gun) used during the robbery, along with three live bullets, belonged to the deceased Yerro Sheikh Sowe. The rifle is yet to be recovered, and efforts are ongoing to locate the remaining suspects. A combined team of investigators from Police Headquarters has been dispatched to support the regional response team and assist with the ongoing investigation. The Gambia Police Force urges the public to remain vigilant and report any information that may be helpful to the investigation to the nearest police station or call 9968885. Further updates will be provided as the investigation progresses.

FIRST LADY FBB CALLS FOR REGIONAL COLLABORATION TO ENHANCE SERVICES FOR GBV SURVIVORS

The First Lady of The Gambia, Fatou Bah Barrow, has called on her fellow First Ladies in the region to collaborate in addressing the negative socio-cultural contexts that perpetuate Gender-Based Violence (GBV). “I wish to assure my continued commitment to the call for gender equality and the empowerment of women. I also pledge to work closely with the First Ladies of Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Senegal to jointly tackle the effects of negative social and cultural norms on GBV by enhancing services for survivors. Additionally, we will engage in community dialogue and raise awareness,” she remarked.

First Lady Barrow expressed gratitude to the UNFPA and the governments of The Gambia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Italy for organizing this important side event during the 69th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women. "We have learned and witnessed the sharing of experiences on best practices and lessons from the progress registered over the 30 years of implementing the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action in our region and beyond," she added. She emphasized the importance of building a regional movement focused on transformative change through strategic partnerships across the continent. The movement aims to eliminate barriers to gender equality and actively invest in adolescent girls over the next five years, ahead of Beijing+40, with the ultimate goal of meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. Furthermore, First Lady Barrow highlighted that her organization, FaBB, in collaboration with the Organization of African First Ladies for Development (OAFLAD), will forge partnerships with civil society and local communities to create a safer and more inclusive environment free of GBV. This new movement seeks to dismantle the stigma surrounding GBV, which often deters survivors from reporting incidents or seeking help due to fear of retaliation, social exclusion, or disbelief. First Lady Fatou Bah Barrow delivered her closing statement at an event organized by the Governments of The Gambia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Italy, and UNFPA. The event was moderated by Ms. Cecile Mazzacurati, Gender & Human Rights Advisor at UNFPA, and took place on Monday, March 17th, at the UN Headquarters in Conference Room E. The Gambian delegation was ably represented by the Secretary General and Secretary to Cabinet, Mr. Alieu Njie, Spouse of the Vice President, H.E Mariama Jallow, Permanent representative to the United Nations, Lamin B. Dibba, Ambasador Momodou Lamin Bah amongst other delegates.

Momodou Sabally Rubbishes UDP'S Lare Sisay

On the Conspiracy Theory and Outlandish claims of Lare Sisay My initial My initial reaction to Lare Sisay’s claim that President Barrow plans to rig the 2026 election was to ignore the outlandish allegations of a disgruntled retired conspiracy theorist. But knowing the gullibility of some people in a society whose literacy levels are still quite low, I thought of a measured rebuttal based on facts and figures. Indeed a fasting Sarahulleh or Kiangka man may be easily swayed by claims of an old man who once worked for the UN. With hunger and thirst at the throats of these my favorite ‘sanaws’ they may be misled by a man they would not imagine could stoop so low as to make claims that are false during this holy month of restraint and repentance. But men like Lare Sisay who seem not to be bothered by either moral or spiritual laws, can do anything in their unrestrained desire for worldly gain and fame. Therefore it is obligatory to set the record straight

Those who have been following Lare in the media already know that this man has no respect or appreciation for facts and #figures; and this is evidenced by outlandish claims he made in an interview on Coffee Time with Peter Gomez citing financial figures that fall way above what the recurrent and development budget numbers of NAWEC could ever come close to. This is one of the reasons why (with hindsight) I am comfortable that President Barrow won the 2021 election. Imagine a man like this being Secretary General and Head of the Civil Service in this country? I honestly wanted UDP to win the 2021 election. But when we lost, I eventually accepted the decree of Allah and moved on. And then gradually I later saw and heard things that further convinced me that (perhaps) the results obtained may be the in the best interest of our country as dictated by the Most High. A person like Lare calling the shots at State House could spell disaster. And perhaps that’s what former President Yahya Jammeh knew and fired him within 72 hours of his appointment as Secretary General in 1994, rendering him the shortest lived SG in the history of this country. In a recent political event where a top UDP member from Central Badibu defected to join the NPP, I stated unequivocally that, with my greater acquaintance with the political realities of this country since I switched sides to NPP, I owe the (now-retired) Chairman of the IEC an apology for my previous claims that the 2021 election was rigged. As for the scoffers who may want to rant about my reversal of position regarding the 2021 election result, I can assure them that I am very comfortable changing my position on a matter once I have better and more reliable correct information. I don’t want to have anything to do with a consistency based on wrong information once I come to know the truth about a matter. As a student of the sage of Concorde, I am not interested in “foolish consistency”. Indeed, the American Philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson is right: “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.” Having joined the NPP, and toured the length and breadth of this country, I am convinced that the NPP actually has more supporters among the eligible voter population than the opposition parties combined. This is the fact and I am not afraid of admitting my errors once evidence is presented and known. That is why I find Lare Sisay’s claims that President Barrow and the NPP cannot win the next election ridiculous. This man, who has never conducted, or spoken at, a proper political rally, cannot claim knowledge and expertise on turfs that are foreign to him. But a man with his ego can make any claims despite their baselessness. His further prognostication of Barrow losing the 2026 election based on the results of the statistically insignificant Massembeh Ward by-election makes his contingent ridiculous claims of Barrow declaring a state of emergency to extend his stay in power beyond 2026, ridiculous and malicious. Taking the 1213 total votes cast in the Massembeh Ward by-election as a percentage of the total of 859 thousand votes cast in the 2021 election yields 0.1 %. Who, in his right mind, would consider that a reliable sample size that would yield the desired confidence level, and margin of error to make any respectable prediction in this age of data science in a knowledge economy? Instead of engaging himself in making baseless ridiculous claims aimed at misleading the public, the old man Lare Sisay should perform ablution, pray two rakas and seek forgiveness from God for his false statements. This man who was the brain behind the UDP’s ill-fated 5-points Agenda should know that he does not possess the sagacity or tenacity to change the course of history in this country. It is people like Lare, who actually cost the UDP the 2021 election by bringing in plagiarized blueprints that are alien to the realities and emotions of the targeted voting population; and, hence, inadvertently laid a red carpet for President Barrow and the NPP to be blessed with a cakewalk into State House in 2021. This is the truth; and Lare Sisay’s vain imagination can never twist that fact into his imagined alternative reality in this blessed country called the Smiling Coast of Africa where the youths are very very very happy. Momodou Sabally Special Adviser to the President of the Republic of The Gambia; Former Secretary General, Presidential Affairs Minister, and former Campaign Manager of UDP.

Selective Justice and Its Implications: Biases Within Civil Society Selective

Alagi Yorro Jallow Fatoumatta: Selective justice is one of the most contentious issues facing Gambian society, particularly in the post-Jammeh era. Justice systems—both transitional and institutional—are meant to be bastions of fairness and accountability. Yet, when justice is perceived as selective, it undermines trust and deepens societal divides. In The Gambia, the outcomes of the Truth, Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission (TRRC) have sometimes been viewed as biased. While the TRRC has successfully uncovered stories of oppression and facilitated justice for many, critics argue that certain individuals have evaded accountability due to their political connections. This threatens the integrity of the justice system, creating a hierarchy where the politically influential escape consequences that ordinary citizens cannot. The situation becomes even more troubling when individuals with links to oppressive regimes or questionable dealings are embraced by political factions. Such actions send a clear and disturbing message: justice is not blind; it is selective. To rebuild trust, we must have a justice system that is transparent, impartial, and insulated from political interference. Justice must be equitable for all Gambians, ensuring that reconciliation is grounded in fairness rather than exclusion. The challenge of selective justice and bias in Gambian society not only erodes trust but also jeopardizes national unity, particularly in terms of international representation.

Fatoumatta: It is disheartening that Gambians are often treated unequally regarding nominations and support for prestigious global positions. Instead, personal biases, political allegiances, and hypocrisy frequently overshadow principles of fairness and merit. A glaring example of this troubling pattern is the recent endorsement by the United Democratic Party (UDP) of Abubacarr Tambadou for the honorable position of Judge at the International Court of Justice, a moment celebrated as a national triumph. In stark contrast, the same enthusiasm was conspicuously absent when Dr. Mamadou Tangara, the country’s Foreign Minister, was nominated for the role of Secretary-General of the Commonwealth. Rather than rallying support, a wave of significant opposition emerged from certain political quarters, including UDP supporters, despite Dr. Tangara’s commendable record in promoting Gambian diplomacy. This raises a pressing question: why the inconsistency?

Ideally, civil society should function as a neutral advocate for equity, justice, and progress. However, when biases infiltrate this sphere, the capacity to hold political actors accountable diminishes, further weakening the democratic framework of the nation. In The Gambia, civil society organizations (CSOs) have been pivotal in championing human rights and good governance. Yet, their autonomy is often called into question due to perceived allegiance with political parties or individuals. Such biases erode the moral authority of CSOs, hindering their effectiveness in advocacy and mediation. Selective advocacy—where some issues receive attention while others are sidelined based on political or personal motives—significantly undermines public trust. A robust and unbiased civil society is essential for nurturing national dialogue, advocating for marginalized voices, and ensuring that leaders are held to account. To achieve this, CSOs must firmly commit to neutrality, inclusivity, and transparency, prioritizing the collective good over individual or partisan interests. The failure to adopt a new constitution serves as a stark illustration of how political self-interest can stall national progress. Fatoumatta: A new constitution was envisioned as a fresh start for The Gambia, embodying the principles of democracy, equality, and justice. Its rejection, however, has left many Gambians disillusioned, sowing deeper divisions within society. The rejected draft constitution was crafted to address pivotal issues—such as term limits, enhanced checks and balances, and robust protections for human rights. The rejection of this crucial document, influenced primarily by partisan interests, not only reflects a disinterest in national priorities but also underscores the challenges of uniting a fractured political landscape on matters that should unify the nation. Moving forward, the adoption of a new constitution must be treated as a national imperative. This undertaking requires authentic dialogue among all stakeholders, free from political gamesmanship. Gambians deserve a constitution that resonates with their aspirations, champions fairness, and establishes a solid foundation for sustainable governance. A Path Forward: To confront these interconnected challenges, The Gambia must embark on a collective journey of introspection and action. Reforming Justice Systems: We must create robust mechanisms to safeguard the justice system from political interference. This includes a thorough review of TRRC recommendations to ensure accountability and fairness for everyone. Strengthening Civil Society: It is crucial that civil society organizations uphold strict neutrality, diligently holding all political actors accountable. The time has come for a united commitment to justice, equity, and genuine democratic progress for all Gambians. Fatoumatta: The Gambia stands on the brink of transformation. By confronting the critical issues of selective justice, inherent biases, and the urgent need for a new constitution, the nation can embark on a path toward unity and prosperity. To realize the vision of inclusivity and progress that its people deserve, The Gambia must embrace fairness, transparency, and a steadfast commitment to national interests. Selective justice poses a significant threat to social equity in The Gambia, eroding the foundational principles of fairness, equality, and trust that are vital for a just society. Consider its far-reaching impacts: Selective justice undermines public confidence in the legal and judicial systems. When people perceive that certain groups or individuals receive preferential treatment based on political affiliations, social status, or connections, it breeds a profound sense of injustice. This disillusionment discourages citizens from seeking justice through legal channels, fostering a culture of impunity and deepening societal resentment. The inequitable application of justice exacerbates existing societal disparities. Marginalized groups often bear the brunt of selective justice, lacking the political power and resources to influence outcomes in their favor. This deepening of social inequities fuels divisions along class, ethnicity, and political lines, further fracturing the social fabric. Fatoumatta: In a politically polarized environment like The Gambia, selective justice heightens tensions and divisions within society. When justice appears to favor one group over another, it fosters mistrust and animosity between communities. This polarization not only undermines national unity but also hampers collective efforts to tackle shared challenges. In the context of transitional justice—especially with the ongoing work of The Gambia's Truth, Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission (TRRC)—selective justice can derail attempts at reconciliation. If certain individuals or groups are perceived as immune to accountability due to political biases, it compromises the legitimacy of reconciliation processes and further exacerbates wounds from past injustices. When citizens lose faith in justice due to perceptions of bias, they often disengage from civic life. This apathy can lead to lower voter turnout, diminished community involvement, and a pervasive sense of hopelessness regarding the potential for positive change. The economic ramifications of social inequity driven by selective justice are equally concerning. A culture in which corruption and nepotism thrive stifles investment and innovation while restricting opportunities for upward mobility. Access to justice and resources should not depend on connections but rather on merit. Furthermore, selective justice undermines the rule of law, creating a system in which laws are applied inconsistently. This not only weakens the foundation of governance but also cultivates the perception that the system serves the privileged few rather than the populace at large. Fatoumatta: To address these pressing challenges, The Gambia must prioritize comprehensive reforms that promote transparency, accountability, and impartiality within the justice system. By strengthening institutions, fostering a culture of meritocracy, and ensuring the judiciary is free from political influence, The Gambia can achieve social equity and restore vital public trust. The time for action is now—together, the nation can forge a brighter and more equitable future.

UDP"s Favoritism And Unequal Treatment of Gambians Exposed

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

Discrimination, Bias, and the Unequal Treatment of Gambians in International Opportunities. The ongoing issue of selective justice and bias in Gambian society is a significant barrier to national unity, particularly in the critical domain of international representation. It is deeply troubling that Gambians are not treated as equals in nominations and support for esteemed global positions. Instead, political allegiances, personal biases, and hypocrisy overshadow the essential principles of fairness and meritocracy. A recent example starkly illustrates this troubling pattern: the United Democratic Party (UDP) fervently backed Abubacarr Tambadou for the prestigious role of Judge at the International Court of Justice, a decision that was widely heralded as a source of national pride. In stark contrast, this enthusiasm was conspicuously absent when Dr. Mamadou Tangara, the country's Foreign Minister, was nominated for the position of Secretary-General of the Commonwealth. Instead of rallying support, significant opposition emerged from certain factions, including UDP supporters and surrogates, despite Dr. Tangara’s outstanding contributions to Gambian diplomacy.

This inconsistency raises a crucial question: why this double standard? Is it merely a reflection of political affiliation or blatant favoritism? If Abubacarr Tambadou, despite his controversial exit from government service, can garner widespread support, why did Dr. Tangara face hostility for seeking a position that would elevate The Gambia’s global standing? This troubling disparity not only deepens divisions but also undermines the very essence of national unity. The repercussions of such bias extend well beyond individual candidates. A culture of exclusion not only inflicts harm on those directly involved but also tarnishes the nation’s reputation and deprives it of crucial opportunities for enhancing its global influence. By failing to support competent Gambians for international roles, we are limiting our collective ability to contribute meaningfully to global discourse and pursue our national interests. It is imperative to recognize that this selective approach to international nominations erodes the sense of shared purpose among Gambians. True progress can only be realized when political loyalties are set aside, and every citizen is afforded an equal opportunity to excel based on merit. A national commitment to prioritizing qualifications, achievements, and merit over political affiliations in the nomination and support of Gambians for global roles is vital.

This merit-based approach not only enhances the country’s credibility but also bolsters its standing on the international stage. It is essential to implement transparent and impartial processes for endorsing candidates for international positions. We must establish robust mechanisms to ensure that decisions are free from favoritism or political agendas and are rooted in fairness and national interest. Civil society, including media outlets and non-partisan organizations, must actively champion transparency in these processes while holding political actors accountable for their endorsements or objections. Creating an equitable and inclusive system for international nominations has the potential to heal divisions and cultivate a stronger national identity. This moment presents a unique opportunity for Gambians to unite, placing national interests above personal agendas. A nationwide dialogue could serve as a crucial platform for rebuilding trust and addressing these grievances, bringing together stakeholders from all sectors to discuss strategies for ensuring fairness, inclusivity, and unity in representing The Gambia on the global stage. Fatoumatta: If bias and exclusion persist unchecked, the long-term consequences could be dire: deeper societal divisions, a profound erosion of trust in our institutions, and a significant miss in positioning The Gambia as a leader in global affairs. It is imperative for Gambians to collectively strive for a future where every citizen, irrespective of political affiliation, is treated as an equal and valuable representative of our nation. When any Gambian rises on the global stage, the entire nation benefits. It is only by embracing fairness, merit, and inclusivity that The Gambia can truly emerge as a shining beacon of unity and progress in the international arena.